Sentences with phrase «better value for money if»

I can get much better value for my money if I eventually buy property in Quebec.»

You can buy a 2 pack to get better value for money if you wish.

We definitely believe that if you are doing the Inca Trail trek and also want to climb Huaynapicchu mountain then your best value for money if you have 5 Days is this option.

It ends up beating GAME's recent deal as well, and for the price it's some seriously good value for money if you're after an RPG to dive into over Christmas.

The phrase «value for money» appears more frequently: «Very good value for money if you know the right individuals»; «Better value than magic circle»; «They add exceptional value at every stage in the process»; and from one very happy client about his advisers: «They are the best firm in the City: they are extremely good technical lawyers, they know my business and are extremely good value for money.»

It may be a little outside of the best crypto laptop price range, starting at $ 900 USD +, but it's definitely good value for money if you do.

Not exact matches

For example, if you're owed money by a large, well - known company, the asset will have a much stronger value than if you are owed money by the local bakery down the street.

If you don't try to negotiate for a higher salary, you could be leaving money on the table — so during your next interview (or annual review), try some of these tricks to increase your perceived value as well as your take - home pay:

This idea revolutionized the world because it was fresh and very smart, if you own a stock below its intrinsic value and the company goes bankrupt, then you will get in return more than what you paid for, so, if the company goes bankrupt, you make money and if the company does well, then you keep making money.

Stocks of companies that have good free cash flow are another option to consider if you don't mind doing the research on individual stocks.2 When a company's free cash flow — the money available after a company makes payments to sustain its business — is increasing, it can be a good sign for the company's future value and its stock's future value.

1Ki 21:2 And after this Ahab said to Naboth, «Give me your vineyard, that I may have it for a vegetable garden, because it is near my house; and I will give you a better vineyard for it; or, if it seems good to you, I will give you its value in money.»

A phantom brand product may be good quality and value for money, but if customers discover they're buying a supermarket - owned product when they thought they were purchasing and supporting an independent brand, they might just end up feeling duped.

If you do buy the Kiss Me Organics matcha, you will get good value for you money.

Our bid to bring in a striker this summer has so far stuttered, and if Arsene Wenger can not find a better value - for - money option, maybe he could still end up raising his offer for Morata, with # 57 Million believed to be needed to tempt the Spanish giants into selling.

But if we're reportedly offering less than his # 25m release clause, then that would make him a lot better value for money, so who knows, might be a good deal after all.

If fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest leveIf fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest leveif Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest level.

To name a few additional struggles: we have to compete with the richest league in the world where every team has money and isn't begging for transfers of their best players to fund themselves (8/20 of the highest valued teams), we have a poor injury record that is being addressed, we have far fewer homegrown talents in our league, the overall league quality is higher even if the highest teams are not of the quality of other top teams, selling of our best players during the past decade has lead to a lack of momentum and yes, there has been times where our manager got it wrong.

In the case of Aaron Ramsey, if Barca can give Arsenal a good money for value, Arsenal can sell him to them because both Arsenal and Barcelona have been partners in the transfer market for long.

Arsenal are odds - on at 1/3 to win this game, which looks like a license to print money as far as I am concerned if you are a big time gambler, but being greedy I am going to look for a much better value bet and will probably increase my stakes by getting some bonuses from the best betting sites listed on bettingsiteoffers.co.uk.

Lacazette is one of our few options out there so I will be happy if this happens If I were Wenger I would also get Mahrez Lacazette and Mahrez would be # 70 - 80 million well spent and better value for money than # 80 mil for Higuain Both are 25 years old with time to get even better, Mahrez has PL experiencif this happens If I were Wenger I would also get Mahrez Lacazette and Mahrez would be # 70 - 80 million well spent and better value for money than # 80 mil for Higuain Both are 25 years old with time to get even better, Mahrez has PL experiencIf I were Wenger I would also get Mahrez Lacazette and Mahrez would be # 70 - 80 million well spent and better value for money than # 80 mil for Higuain Both are 25 years old with time to get even better, Mahrez has PL experience.

2nd you will loose on his much needed value if you let him off for free next season instead of making good use of this money to obtain a decent replacement someone like Mahrez or whom ever else would be a much better asset in that scenario plus Sanzhez being South American and all shall be very vocal about it and will throw tantrums and negative images through out the season for keeping him against his will and will simply will act childish which we all saw is very capable of and this would seriously affect team spirit for no good reason if you can actually avoid all that and offload him for a decent price now

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Gini Wijnaldum for anything over # 20 million may seem excessive and you may be able to reel off a list of better value for money players but if Klopp's happy with the player that should be enough.

If you are siding towards them to come good in the face of adversity, then grab the big value odds of 3/1 on them to do it at Paddy Power, who are also running a Money Back Special for the round of sixteen at Brazil 2014.

The G - Luxe is an excellent stroller, but if you got four years out of your Italian job, I'd say that's good value for the money!

I would say the Hotel Grifo is good value for money; especially if the highlight of your trip is to discover the Roman Ruins.

But when it comes down to it there are many aspects to an organizer which all determine its quality, and if it's a good value for money product you want its best to be aware of what makes the best stroller organizer.

In «Jané Trider Extreme Stroller reviews» when we talk about compatibility then obviously stroller is very much luxuries with attractive look & good features, & if you want value for money then you can go for it if you can compromise with the heavy weight.

If you think of value for money so Inglesina Trilogy Stroller Review is the best stroller you can have to make your baby ride happy & safe.

This is probably the best value for money choice if you want to buy a tandem stroller.

Aspects such as storage space and durability come into the overall quality of the product; which when it boils down to it, determines if you are getting good value for your money.

Most importantly, it is better if you can spend time reading the labels considerately to become a smart shopper purchasing best value - for - money products to your baby.

If you use the car quite often for long journeys, then this is a good value for money.

Looking back now If I had to go back and choose again, I would probably go for Huggies Gold for both my children simply because I believe that it is better value for money.

70 % of parents say a Degree Apprenticeship is better value for money, and two thirds of parents would still prefer their child took this route even if money were no object.

Given that breakfasts are cheaper than lunches, the IFS concluded that they were likely to give better value for money.

«If you are a contractor and you don't work well and you don't give the people of this country value for money it will not be tolerated.

If you're looking for the best 6.5» component speakers for the money, the three - year warranty on this set from BOSS Audio is the icing on the cake and a great value.

A great choice if you're looking for the best touch screen car radio, this touch screen by BOSS really brings the value for money.

Give industry a break: If you want companies to carry out more research, tax incentives give good value for money, according to new studies.

Are probiotic supplements worth the money and if so is there a way of selecting the products that offer the best value for money?

If you wish to find the best dating sites online, the site for you is Comparethedatingmarketplace.com a top online dating search directory and dating price comparison site that allows you to compare the market place to find the best dating sites that offer the best value for money.

Comparing to the membership charge and the service they provide this is the best value for money dating site if you are desperate in need of a good interracial dating site.

If you want the best value for money, choose a 6 month subscription.

Chance of getting a date Protect privacy Features Customer service Value for money If you're a beautiful woman seeking the companionship of a millionaire, then EstablishedMen.com is one of the best dating sites you should explore.

For example, you'll receive a better exchange rate if you change large values of money.

There is also a buffet options available if you are looking to get the best value for money in the local area.

If value for money is your most important consideration, Sugar Daddy Today is your best choice

Nevertheless, there are good and great dating sites for over 50 that you can join and get maximum value for your time and money if it is paid one.

If you feel like the subscription rates are a bit high for your budget, you can go for the top notch 6 - month subscription package that offers the best value for your money.