Sentences with phrase «better value for the money spent»

When you purchase a product that has the best value for the money spent on the product, this toddler bed has exactly what you need.

You must find such equipment that will help you perform all exercises in an effective manner that can get you the best value for the money you spend.

But the problems that led an infuriated Congress to insist that the country get good value for the money spent on vulnerable children are still with us.

Find out if it's a good value for the money spent in this detailed review.

Facilities and spectacular vistas are best value for the money spent as Umalas Residence provides complete facilities such as: fitness center to keep the guests in shape, laundry, 24 hour security, serviced apartment, restaurant, room service, lounge and bar, free Wi - Fi, spa «so nice Jacuzzi», swimming pool located in the center of building, and sauna.

At the same time, we must ensure that we receive good value for the money we spend on law firms.

As money is tighter these days, the drive behind this is nothing more than getting better value for the money spent on legal fees.

Even so, it is still most appropriate to look at this like any other purchase and to try to do what you can to get the best value for the money you spend.

When you have a seller prospect that is only fixated on paying the least amount possible instead of finding the best value for money spent you can smile and walk away knowing you are a true professional (and have lots of other opportunities to work with people that value your services).

Not exact matches

I do not advocate spending money like Manchester city and PSG, but there were decent players available for good value.

Lacazette is one of our few options out there so I will be happy if this happens If I were Wenger I would also get Mahrez Lacazette and Mahrez would be # 70 - 80 million well spent and better value for money than # 80 mil for Higuain Both are 25 years old with time to get even better, Mahrez has PL experience.

its frustrating being a gunner every single period of the season including the transfer window... we want to b d best but our transfer situations begs to differ... how many tyms do we need to shout spend, spend, spend b4 dat happens???? wat is d point of being in d «top 10 financially rich clubs» list every year but don't spend like 1????? sure, we'll buy d odd 30m player but is it enough... dat stingy prof will always look for «value» for money spent but he has dat worked out for d past 12 years walcott - waste tbh chamberlain - waste chambers - so far, waste spending 15m five times is 75m which could have been used to buy 2 top 30m signings....

United have plenty of money to spend, but will surely now turn their attention towards the likes of Alexis Sanchez, who should be available for as little as # 35million due to his contract situation, or Paulo Dybala, who would be better value at # 75m - plus than someone like Vardy.

arsenal as a big and rich club they didn't spent so much money to buy best players in the past years like the other big clubs so this time it is a must that arsenal buys best defender, midfielder and striker and as well keep Sanchez valuing the service that he will be giving next season mote than # 50 m which will also protect him not to play against arsenal at least for the coming season, and who knows after wards..

Im not sure your comment is correct... everyone starts somewhere at a reasonable price Cesc was free and turned into a valuable player Bellerin — similar and valued at # 50mn now apparently Kante — bought for nothing and won 2 premier leagues in a row Vardy from non-league to England and prem league title Mahrez — 400k Holding — looks good and only # 2mn Mbappe — last year was # 230k now # 100mn Teams like Man City, Chelsea and Man Utd plus eg Monaco and others just pay silly money which inflates the price and then «fans» feel their clubs have to spend the same....

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Words are very cheap and although it is unfair to suggest that the board have not invested they have not spent money wisely; always looking for a great deal rather than the best value.

This is good since it will offer service to parent for a long period of time giving value to the money spent.

Most importantly, it is better if you can spend time reading the labels considerately to become a smart shopper purchasing best value - for - money products to your baby.

This is not negligible because it is better to have the value for your money last because you want to spend more money on other things your baby needs.

7) Governments may decide that «smart» spending on intelligence, strategic deterrents and high quality rapid deployment forces is better value for money than vast legions of mediocre mechanised infantry for a hypothetical war which nobody wants.

In his latest statement on getting better value for money from taxpayers» spending on politics David Cameron has written for the Belfast Telegraph about politicians sitting in two legislatures:

There is a delicate balance to be struck in government between encouraging as many people as possible to create wealth and ensuring the bit that is taken in tax is spent well, so that people feel they are getting value for their money.

Labour also said today they would pledge better value for public money while making no big spending commitments in a bid to reduce a record budget deficit.

Ipsos MORI polling backs this up with the Conservatives holding a considerable lead over Labour throughout 2009 and 2010 in terms of being seen as the party that would be most effective in getting good value for the public money it spends.

The Conservatives and Labour are virtually tied in terms of being seen as the party that would be most effective in getting good value for the public money it would spend in government: 38 % choose the Conservatives and 36 % Labour.

Noting that just 1.6 p of every # 1 spent by the UK government goes to development, Sir Tony insists that aid is good value for money.

Day also introduced a proposal for a local law to ensure a «Best Value Procurement» whereby local vendors will be the preferred suppliers of these services, helping to keep the money we spend supporting the County in the County.

M: Overall, there are major differences in performance in relation to money spent, and the correlation tends to be that the best performers are countries which, in effect, make sure that young people are set free to pursue their own agenda and express their creativity, and that systems that entrench the young too long in training or in hierarchical structures of apprenticeship and deference to their elders don't get the same value for their money.

I am not sure that the products represent good value for money, however as they were the only company that I could find who have a specialist range of maternity wedding dresses I felt happy to spend my money with them.

RIBA says that whilst money is scarce, spending on school buildings can help deliver better value for money.

This will ensure that the money is spent in a way that is fair, open and good value for money.

Understanding your spend Schools have autonomy over the use of their budgets and so it is for heads and governors to determine at school level how to secure better value for money.

Today's committee report states: «Unjustifiably high salaries use public money that could be better spent on improving children's education and supporting frontline teaching staff, and do not represent value for money.

The ESA model also encourages parents to obtain the best value for their child's education dollars, as unspent money in one year can be rolled over to the next and even be spent on college costs.

• The Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) Select Committee in the House of Commons should monitor and report on higher education funding and provision each year, assessing the impact of changes on disadvantaged students, as well as mature and part - timers; • Better co-ordination between higher education ministers from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to rationalise student funding policies across the UK; • An investigation by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) into the impact of the latest changes to grants and loans, to ensure value for money for students and taxpayers; • Stronger evaluation of university spending of # 750m a year on outreach and access programmes to maximise their impact.

We will try to keep you as best informed as possible so that your campaigns run smoothly, delivering maximum value for the money you spend.

But the PAC said: «Unjustifiably high salaries use public money that could be better spent on improving children's education and supporting front - line teaching staff and do not represent value for money.»

«In tackling the challenges we face on school building, I have been determined to use the capital funding at my disposal to best effect, seeking value for money and efficiency from every pound spent,» his statement said.

As a professional research analyst, I have spent 100's of hours in search of the best value for money in publishing my own literary works.

Kindle 3 is also pretty good value for money, especially with the free 3G Internet, and leaves the Sony 650 far behind in terms of value per dollar spent.

In fact, given that indy authors tend to pay editors and proof readers, and want value for money, whereas editors in traditional houses are involved in a large number of projects, and are well - known to spend the bulk of their time in meetings rather than editing, and proofing is contracted out - often to the same proof - readers as many indies use (and some editors care how good it is, and some don't) the standards may well be higher in indy bestsellers.

I feel like I'm getting good value for my money, so I'm willing to spend a little more.

Customers spending $ 120 per year may be more inclined to get the best possible value for their money.

However, for values - based investors in particular, the extra money may be well worth spending.

But it is a sure bet that those owners who spend money on their dogs will value their dogs and will be more likely to care for them better than some owners who buy a dog for pocket change.

And a budget - relieving donation valued at more than $ 4 million dollars allows Best Friends to spend more money on the various programs across the country that we deploy to save lives, and the highly nutritious food will ensure every pet that comes through our centers will be at their best for their adoptiBest Friends to spend more money on the various programs across the country that we deploy to save lives, and the highly nutritious food will ensure every pet that comes through our centers will be at their best for their adoptibest for their adoptions.

If you wish to spend a relaxing holiday in Spain's Mediterranean coast, and you are looking for a good value for money hotel in Torremolinos, Hotel Carmen Teresa is the perfect accommodation choice.

This value for money accommodation option may be a good choice for your Sydney stay if one needs to watch the dollars spent on their Sydney holiday lodging.

As it's mainly Portuguese people who spend time here, the area is relatively quiet, untouched and offers good value for money, one of a hidden gem in Portugal.