Sentences with phrase «better way of speaking»

Is there a better way of speaking of God's self - revelation than in the category of being?

Translator: He's just saying you have a very good way of speaking; you kind of brighten up the room, so it's making him feel a little less hungover this morning!

Not exact matches

There's no better way to learn the ins and outs of starting any small business than to speak with business owners who've done it — either successfully or not.

• Speaking of Time's Up... Attorney Tina Tchen, who Bloomberg describes as «arguably the most well - connected person working in women's rights today, thanks to her six years as an assistant to President Barack Obama and as first lady Michelle Obama's chief of staff,» talks about why it was so important that Time's Up include a legal defense fund: «The fastest way to make sure that someone isn't getting bullied by a lawyer for someone rich and powerful is to make sure that person has a lawyer, too.»

Speaking with them is the best way to gauge the strength of the relationship and understand where their business is headed.

We've found that planning promotional events is one of the best ways to meet our customers face - to - face and simultaneously control our brand messaging, thereby accomplishing something so important for a young company without an established brand: speaking for itself.

Speaking for free may have been what we've been taught but it's not the best way to start your paid speaking career or the paid speaking portion of your bSpeaking for free may have been what we've been taught but it's not the best way to start your paid speaking career or the paid speaking portion of your bspeaking career or the paid speaking portion of your bspeaking portion of your business.

Mastering this way of speaking, especially in high pressure situations or for longer periods of time, can't possibly be so easy, but still it's good to know that the basic principles of improving your voice are completely straightforward.

AI performance on 2018 - 2019 Android phones running on the Snapdragon 845 will be tripled, which will help voice assistants better understand more natural ways of speaking.

Broadly speaking, it describes the way unconscious generalizations about people («men are better leaders») lead people to ignore objective reality («these women are outscoring most of the men on the leadership test»).

Speaking of tech, Fortune is looking for a few good companies harnessing the power of technology in new and innovative ways to tackle pressing global problems.

Generally speaking, when Google makes an algorithm update, it does so because its engineers think there is a better way to present lists of information to Google users.

Nixon said the way Weston put Loblaw front and centre in the wake of the collapse and tried to become part of the solution «speaks very well of Galen as an individual, shows good leadership.»

Introduce any buyers personas speaking in the first person is the best way for make the team feel that the persona is in front of them.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

But until we come to the end of ourselves then we are going to do and say what we want, even as it was with me: It's one thing to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole other ball game to set our hearts on God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just give up, we know then who has given up by the one they advocate for, even has given place to: Paul said; with my heart I want to do what is right, but my flesh does what I hate: This is when God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right with God, but our flesh is not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out to do what we hate, our hearts are set on God and His ways which has been established in the Word of Truth, which then causes us to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending to happen within us, for Christ to be formed in us this needs to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars against our flesh, even as Christ wars against the man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the man of sin: Many who have come out of religion has done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (Religion) to the other mountain top «to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes to humble us: One extreme to the other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one with Him, even as Jesus is with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria

He spoke to me through one of my oldest best friends (who by the way is also completely non-religious; it was although God took over his body and voice to speak with me) and delivered so many messages over a period of about 2 hours that my mind feels like it will explode.

Good news: In the near future, John will see his brother — in - law alive again; also, his son Tony (that died in an accident on the way home from work) and, Lucas will walk on his feet not his knees and will be able to speak without the use of a computer.

The first verse of Hebrews strikes me as a good definition of creative incarnation: «In the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets at many times and in various ways» (TNIV).

This is a very well spoken article, i am le tell it truly comes from the heart as i read on, personally i think that all of these sceptics out there should read this article that way people can understand more about why the burial occured with such haste!

This gets into philosophy - of - law issues, of course, but even some imaginable judicially restrained economic - autonomy - is - Locke's - teaching scholars (i.e., really none of the libertarian con - law scholars I know of) would be advocating a way of life, and a pattern of regular legislation, that centered one's practice of liberty upon, well, business - man, or to speak Republic book VIII, oligarchic - man, accomplishments.

(New Testament) Whay did Christ die on the cross anyway, if the old way was good enough??? When Paul speaks of the law he means anything that we should must or ought be doing.

The better way to read it is that it speaks of things past, things present, and things future.

Most of the prophets felt this way when they did their best to speak the Word of God, and only got mocked, jeered, and imprisoned in return.

While speaking he would occasionally pause to hear a question from an imaginary interlocutor, say «Well,» and then clarify in that way he had of getting an idea perfectly balanced.

The Gospels have in their way met this problem, not only by placing the kerygma on Jesus» lips, but also by presenting individual units from the tradition in such a way that the whole gospel becomes visible: At the call of Levi, we hear (Mark 2.17): «I came not to call the righteous, but sinners»; at the healing of the deaf - mute, we hear (Mark 7.37): «He has done all things well; he even makes the deaf hear and the dumb speak.»

Our numbed and bewildered society lacks ways of thinking and speaking that can help us find remedies — that can enable us to go deep into the crisis and so avoid denial, and to imagine a better future and so avoid despair.

Jesus says it this way, «Woe to you, when all people speak well of you» (Luke 6:26).

Together with the opening line of the Letter to the Hebrews («In ancient times God spoke to man through prophets and in varied ways, but now he speaks through Christ, His Son...»), as well as many other biblical texts, this passage reveals to us a startling truth.

These chapters have a naïve, symbolic way of speaking, well suited to the understanding of primitive people.

To speak of sexual undertakings in the way implied by the traditional marriage rites of the churches is to deny people access to a basic human good from the start and for reasons that are difficult if not impossible for modern people to grasp.

Rorty uses the term «edification» to stand for «this project of finding new, better, more interesting, more fruitful ways of speaking» (PMR 360).

only reason y i say this is because of Santification, once we give our life to the Lord, we streight way (so to speak) begin the process of Santification, this is Christ making us like him, and this Is SUFFERING It does nt happen over night, but for the duration of our time here, as you have said, its sort of like sin being done unto us, and we are handleing it just like Christ did, (with Love) of coarse with the help of the Holy Spirit, This Does NOT feel Good At ALL since our soulful flesh is Corrupt, (but our spirit is saved) This is were your trails and tribulation, your own desire, and All play apart, Now Moment by Moment we choose by our own will, And Jesus helps in these times, as he was tempeted, but without sin, The devil can do nothing but try and decieve the Christian into thinking that he has to work for his salvation as you have said, this thing here is about your Inheritance In Christ, Its gonna be some show nought broke christian in Heaven, because their trying to set of for themseleve trasure on earth, and their is going to be weeping and gnat of teeth, but it wont be, because of their going to Hell, It will be cause they miss out on what they could have had, and it is Devistation, cause they waste so much time, and they wont be able to attend the wedding, supper of the lamb, they wont be, getting the position over city, galacy, ectt... just check it out some of the points i have made, God Bless you!

We must find ways in the public forum to close ranks with Jews — and indeed with all other persons of good will — to speak unitedly about our common concerns.

At best this is a symbolic way of speaking, and to understand it we must look at the whole God - world relationship.

And what they all say in different words is fundamentally the same thing, just as seven sons of a good mother speaks each in his own way of her.

Speaking to the Telegraph, Rev M'Caw said: We have been asked to reduce the frequency of bellringing, and are looking for a way to be good neighbours to everybody and to arrive at an acceptable compromise.»

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

The Old as well as the New Testament has the astonishing power to speak of the divine in such a way that the I - thou character of the relation never darkens the transpersonal power and mystery of the divine, and vice versa.29

When presented with an explanation of the text that challenges our own explanation, our immediate defensive position is to say, «Well, that's wrong because they are importing their own human interpretation into the text rather than letting the text speak for itself the way I do.»

Dalahäst If not true, then it only speaks to us the same way that the Greek myths of Prometheus and Pandora do, or the way any bit of good fiction does, right?

Citing South African Anglican Bishop Desmond Tutu's book Hope and Suffering, the pastor speaks of the endurance needed to participate in the marathon walk for justice and peace, a walk possible only through a mobilizing yet sober hope that anticipates a Good Friday on the way to Easter.

Third, since God is not the great exception, metaphysically speaking, but is himself «the supreme exemplification» of the principles which actually and concretely operate in the world, a study of how the world goes will be the best way in which we can come to understand the nature of the divine activity itself.

When I speak of faith, I speak of faith in a better way of being human and relating, etc..

Such manuals as that of Garrigou - Lagrange typically cite Hebrews 1:1 as a scriptural basis for this understanding: «In many and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets; but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son...» The notion of God's locutio is easily assimilable to that of propositional truth which in turn best suits the interests of apologetics.

Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz

This can be well seen in Peter's way of speaking of faith and of salvation.

He would, at times, preach about the «pastor roast», warning us that we had better not speak badly of him or we will be punished by God the way Aaron and Mariam were struck with leprosy and put outside the camp.

Speaking during Premier's News Hour, she said: «We have whole issues with purity culture and modesty culture which says, «well, women, if you dress a certain way it's your fault if a man behaves in that way» and so actually for a lot of women they have been conditioned to blame themselves and say «if he's done that to me it must be my fault».

One way of acknowledging its revisability is to say that it can survive the critique laid for it by Wayne Proudfoot in his 1985 Religious Experience and, more importantly, by the postmodern culture for which Proudfoot speaks.13 If it ignores that kind of postmodern critique, I am suggesting, it will not deliver on the promise it has shown recently in the growth of The American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, in the founding of The Highlands Institute for American Religious Thought, in the resurgence of Columbia and Yale forms of neonaturalism and pragmatism in the work of Robert Corrington and William Shea, 14 and in the American Academy of Religion Group on Empiricism in American Religious Thought — as well as in the growing independent scholarship of those working out of the empirical side of process theology and the Chicago school.