Not exact matches
Brunner's total position could be made much clearer and more consistent if he
abandoned his strictures on philosophy as such and limited himself to distinguishing sharply
between all thinking that is informed by
faith and all thinking that is not informed by
faith.
He distinguishes
between early and late apostasy;
between «shallow» apostasy that rejects a particular religion but retains a form of spirituality, and «deep» apostasy that concludes there is no deity at all; and
between the «mild» apostasy of those who were only nominally religious in the first place and the «transforming» apostasy of those who had been seriously committed to the
faith they later
abandoned.
This false dichotomy can wreak havoc on young Christians raised to believe they have to choose
between God and evolution, and who after encountering evidence in support of the theory,
abandon faith altogether.