New York Chief Judge John Lippman echoed this connection
between access to civil justice and public safety when he stated: «If what happens inside this courthouse or any courthouse... is anything short, even by the smallest amount, of promoting equal justice... [t] he most vulnerable in our society, they're the ones who have suffered the most.»
Not exact matches
In her 2012 testimony before the Task Force
to Expand
Access to Civil Legal Services in New York, District Attorney Kathleen Rice described the link between the civil access to justice gap and public safety in this m
Access to Civil Legal Services in New York, District Attorney Kathleen Rice described the link between the civil access to justice gap and public safety in this ma
Civil Legal Services in New York, District Attorney Kathleen Rice described the link
between the
civil access to justice gap and public safety in this ma
civil access to justice gap and public safety in this m
access to justice gap and public safety in this manner:
The domestic question is the balancing exercise
between a
civil justice process that pays for itself (thus meeting the Osborne goal of an economy in surplus) and the level at which fees affect
access to justice, either broadly or upon the state's obligations under Art 6.
Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Chief
Justice of Canada, in order to develop consensus and priorities around improving access to civil and family justice in Canada, while also encouraging cooperation and collaboration between all stakeholders in the justice
Justice of Canada, in order
to develop consensus and priorities around improving
access to civil and family
justice in Canada, while also encouraging cooperation and collaboration between all stakeholders in the justice
justice in Canada, while also encouraging cooperation and collaboration
between all stakeholders in the
justice justice system.
Stating «There is a difference
between the improving the delivery of legal services and
access to justice» I believe the later seeks
to serve those most marginalized by our
civil justice system.
October 19, 2016 — «Judges from along the Eastern seaboard convene at Fordham University School of Law Wednesday night for a discussion on the intersection
between civil and criminal
access to justice and how
to better handle the overlapping deficiencies in both systems.
Between the hearing of the Petition and the hearing of the appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada made its recent pronouncement on «
access to justice» in Canada's
civil litigation system in the case of Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2104 SCC 7, cited by the
justices in this appeal decision.