Not exact matches
In 2010 children in more deprived areas engaged in more physical activity out of
school than those in more
affluent areas, but
between 2006 and 2010 there was an overall reduction in physical activity out of
school.
I realize, of course, that there have always been sharp disparities
between schools in
affluent areas and poor areas — reflected in the quality of teachers, the availability of materials, the curricula, facilities and more.
Doing so, it seems to me, would result in terrible disparities
between affluent and poor
schools, or
schools where the administration /
school board choses to make nutrition a priority and those where it takes a back seat.
Affluent students who receive a top - notch education may acquire this skill as a matter of course, but this capacity is often lacking among low - income students who attend struggling
schools — holding out the hopeful possibility that retrieval practice could actually begin to close achievement gaps
between the advantaged and the underprivileged.
The critical - thinking gap
between field trip students from rural and high - poverty
schools and similar students who didn't go on the trip was significantly larger than the gap
between affluent students who went and
affluent students who didn't go.
The difference
between affluent and poor students is around three years of
schooling, it equates to about three years of
schooling in each maths, science and reading literacy — that is really, very concerning.
What they saw was sobering but not surprising: Despite attempts to close achievement gaps
between students of color, immigrant students, and low - income students and their more
affluent white peers, wide disparities persisted in student performance on state tests, graduation rates,
school attendance, and college - going rates.
Children on free
school meals achieve almost half a GCSE grade less in Attainment 8 core subjects than more
affluent pupils, according to the report, and 88 per cent of this gap is believed to be due to differences
between pupils at the same
school.
After interviewing more than 50 of these gentrifiers about their
school - choice process, I concluded that it is the substantive differences in parenting styles
between the white, upper - middle - class parents and the nonwhite, less -
affluent parents that are hindering
school integration, as these parenting styles directly affect
school culture and expectations.
«We are plenty in technological resources to enhance our education, yet the lack of equity and amount of resources that kids have in America is amazing,» he said, citing the vast difference
between technology use in poor and
affluent schools.
Most of these families, I suspect, will be relatively
affluent and well - educated — either capable of paying the difference
between private
school tuition and the value of the ESA or able to afford for one parent to stay home with the kids and play teacher.
Meanwhile, the gap
between advantaged and disadvantaged students is remarkably similar
between schools with comparatively
affluent student bodies and those with comparatively disadvantaged student bodies.
He suggests that
schools can have only a limited influence on closing the achievement gap
between students who live in poverty and their more
affluent peers unless
school improvement is combined with broader social and economic reforms.
Some 84 percent of teachers worry that technology is contributing to greater disparities
between affluent and disadvantaged
schools and
school districts, according to the Pew Research Center.
New research by the Social Mobility Commission has uncovered a progression gap
between choices made by children on free
school meals and their more
affluent peers which can not be explained by their results at
school or where they live.
Both counties are criticised for an «unacceptably wide» gap
between the achievements of young people who are eligible for free
school meals (FSM) and those from more
affluent families.
Four - in - ten children not «
school ready» by time they start primary in some areas Some of biggest gaps between poorer and wealthier pupils in affluent areas School readiness gap explains 4
school ready» by time they start primary in some areas Some of biggest gaps
between poorer and wealthier pupils in
affluent areas
School readiness gap explains 4
School readiness gap explains 40 % of
Considerable research shows that the primary reason the achievement gap
between poor children and their more
affluent peers widens over the course of their
school careers is the long break in learning over the summer.
The plans of both candidates offer a smorgasbord of remedies to close the achievement gap
between poor and
affluent school districts, including approaches to help
schools close the digital divide.
Such an approach is likely to discourage good teachers from working in high - need
schools and to widen the gap
between poor and
affluent students.
Educrats all over the country have begun to persuade federal education officials to grant waivers from NCLB, adopting the position that it is unfair to label
schools as failing when the performance gaps
between ethnic groups are so wide and when minority children lag so far behind their White, more
affluent peers.
It's time we set the record straight: Charter
schools are doing important work to raise the level of performance for children who need it the most and to close the achievement gap
between our inner - city students and those in our more
affluent communities.
Montgomery County's policy ensures that parent dollars do not exacerbate these inequities, but it does not address deeper staffing disparities that frequently occur
between the most
affluent and the least
affluent schools.
Other white and
affluent parents choose private
schools, either because their children are not accepted to their first choice of public
schools, or because they are bothered by the racial separation within and
between New York public
schools.
Beyond dollars and cents, promoting partnerships
between affluent and higher - poverty
schools would improve offerings on both campuses.71 Several
school systems already take a similar approach — focused on performance rather than demographics — that could be transferred to high - and low - resource
schools.
However, there's plenty of evidence that shopping for
schools is complicated by information asymmetries
between schools and parents and extensive stratification in access to information
between low - income and more
affluent parents.
Last year the gap
between richer and poorer students reached a record high, with pupils eligible for free
school meals — a long term indicator of poverty — said to be less than half as likely to go on to higher education than their most
affluent peers.
Students in low - income
schools are more likely to be given an «A» for work that would receive a «C» in a more affluent school, according to «Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Groups: Lessons from Schools and Districts on the Performance Frontier,» an Education Trust study released last No
schools are more likely to be given an «A» for work that would receive a «C» in a more
affluent school, according to «Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps
Between Groups: Lessons from
Schools and Districts on the Performance Frontier,» an Education Trust study released last No
Schools and Districts on the Performance Frontier,» an Education Trust study released last November.
We know there is a positive correlation
between property value and
school quality, a correlation that penalizes families without the means to live in an
affluent area.
A recent study of urban, suburban, and rural
schools in four states found that smaller
schools helped close the achievement gap — as measured by test scores —
between students from poor communities and students from more
affluent ones.
She also dragged out the tired argument that the gap
between rich and poor will be exacerbated by «giving a public subsidy to
affluent families that choose elite private
schools, which are unlikely to admit students who struggle academically or can not afford tuition even with a voucher.»
But Mills challenged that assumption, as well, stating that building strong relationships
between school administrators and teachers can minimize the disparity in quality teachers
between lower - income and more
affluent schools.
While there always have been inequalities among the nation's public
schools, the gap in spending
between public
schools in the poorest and most -
affluent communities has grown during the past decade.
Only 54 percent of middle
school and high
school teachers surveyed thought their students «have sufficient access to digital tools at
school,» according to a 2013 Pew Research Center survey, and 84 percent said that «today's digital technologies are leading to greater disparities
between affluent and disadvantaged
schools and
school districts.»
The case also spotlighted the financial gulf
between working - class, minority districts like Edgewood and predominantly white,
affluent ones such as the Alamo Heights Independent
School District, just five miles away.
We also recognize the inequality of facilities, supplies and «extras»
between what a public
school in City Heights can offer when compared to what public
schools offer in our more
affluent communities.
That said, the vast majority of the district's oldest
schools are located south of Interstate 8 — a line that's often used as shorthand for the division
between affluent and poor San Diego neighborhoods.
In fact, according to the Annie E. Casey Foundation, half of the
school achievement gap
between economically - disadvantaged young children and their more
affluent peers starts before kindergarten.
There have been a set of studies done out of John Hopkins University that track student gains in learning over time, and they find that in general the slope of learning gains for low - income kids and more
affluent kids in this country is pretty equivalent
between September and June of every
school year.
More than 80 % of AP teachers agree that today's digital technologies are leading to greater disparities
between affluent and disadvantaged
schools and
school districts (Pew Research Center 2013).
80 % of AP teachers agree that today's digital technologies are leading to greater disparities
between affluent and disadvantaged
schools and
school districts.
Digital technologies are leading to greater disparities
between affluent and disadvantaged families and
schools.
Although the observations that follow are based mainly on UK experience, similar trends appear to be emerging across global education systems: increased public accountability in tandem with greater autonomy for
schools; an urgent imperative to close the opportunity gap
between affluent and poorer communities; national, public or state authority over
schools being replaced by stakeholder communities or not - for - profit mission - driven organisations impatient with endemic failures of the status quo.
«There is a big disconnect
between perceptions of high
school quality and the reality of college preparation, and that stems even to those who come from middle - class and
affluent backgrounds.»
Many Bay Area
schools show a large gap in performance not only
between low - income students and more
affluent peers, but
between different racial / ethnic groups within the same economic status.
In other words, the consequence of being out of
school is to increase the already unacceptably large achievement gap
between low - income students and their
affluent peers.»
Unfortunately, low - income students are less likely than more
affluent peers to be immersed in secondary
school environments that encourage open interaction
between them and their peers and teachers, both inside and outside of class.
This
school resides at the border
between the
affluent southwestern census tracts and the less
affluent central census tracts.
A recent study published in the Journal of Primary Prevention confirms that PAT measurably improves
school readiness, virtually eliminating the achievement gap normally observed
between poor children and their more
affluent peers at the point of kindergarten entry, and that gap continued to be narrowed in the third grade.
When children enter kindergarten, half of the achievement gap
between low - income students and their more
affluent peers that exists in high
school is already present.22 The federal government can address the developmental needs of young children through child care reform by implementing policies that improve quality starting at birth and continuing up to age 13.