Currently I am about to complete a book on this question of the encounter
between the biblical faith and African religion.
In the evangelical world, for example, it seemed important several decades ago to insist that there is indeed a positive relationship
between biblical faith and active involvement in political life.
Not exact matches
Today theology is faced with the overwhelming task of establishing a dialectical synthesis
between a radically profane «subjectivity» (Existenz) and an authentically
biblical mode of
faith.
But I am allowing for an honest dialog within myself
between my
faith and my deep appreciation of science and the evolution of human culture since
Biblical times.
We have already noted the conflict which runs through most of Christian thought
between the
biblical vision of God as the creative and redemptive actor in the history of his creation, and the metaphysical doctrine inherited from the synthesis of the Christian
faith with neo-platonic philosophy which conceives God as the impassible, non-temporal absolute.
The projection of an opposition
between reason and
faith» wherein the former claims objectivity and the latter demands assent to a set of propositions that can not be proven» into the
biblical context anachronistically imposes Enlightenment categories where they would not have been intelligible.
This attitude toward the relation
between history and myth is developed by Buber in his books of
biblical commentary, Königtum Gottes, Moses, and The Prophetic
Faith, and it is this which constitutes one of the most significant contributions of these remarkable works.
Ladaria recognizes that «insofar as Gnosticism and Pelagianism represent perennial dangers for misunderstanding
Biblical faith, it is possible to find similarities
between the ancient heresies and the modern tendencies.»
As the old models of
biblical study break down, Gary - along with his former colleague at Harvard, Jon Levenson - has been at the forefront of efforts to rethink the relations
between the historical - critical project and the living realities of contemporary Christian and Jewish
faith.
Benedict tried to overcome the rift in
biblical interpretation
between faith and history.
If our concern is peacemaking — particularly the special urgency given that task by the nuclear threat — then we shall have to come to grips with those portions of the
biblical witness in which the community of
faith has been forced to deal with the violence and pain of conflict
between peoples.
Historical arguments
between their
faiths have rarely if ever been over what to call Abraham's God or who was invoked by that call, and Islamic salvation history is rooted in the conviction that there is a lasting continuity
between the dispensations of Muhammad, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and the
biblical and extrabiblical prophets.
I will say that the very concept of a god who would deny love
between any two people, especally in this world and day of age, is absurd, and if you're religous principles guide you in that direction, perhaps the time you spend fighting for «
biblical marrage» should be spent questiong your own
faith.
But Tillich's acknowledgment of the fundamental difference
between what he calls «God» and his understanding of the
biblical God implicitly, at least, gives support to my assertion that this use of philosophy is in severe tension with
biblical faith.
From another, we might rather say that dialectical theology refuses to be truly dialectical, it refuses both radical transcendence (
biblical or eschatological
faith) and radical immanence (contemporary Existenz), and thus is forced to reach a non-dialectical synthesis
between a partial transcendence (Tillich's Unconditioned and Bultmann's Word of
faith) and a partial immanence (an Existenz whose Angst can only be answered by «
faith»).
There would be questions of
biblical theology about the nature of Christian freedom, the relation
between law and Gospel, the meaning of the law for those justified by
faith.
Furthermore, modern
biblical scholarship has fully demonstrated the chasm which exists
between the
faith of the historic Church and its
biblical ground, a chasm created by the entrance of the Church into history.
We have to review carefully the
biblical faith about human needs for much in the contemporary search for a new Christian style of life and much of the estrangement
between Christian
faith and secular man lies just here.
While the debates rage on about whether Noah is
biblical enough, Heaven is For Real true enough, and God is Not Dead profitable enough, Philomena delivers a quiet, understated, and powerful portrayal of the actual human experience, where clear - cut lines
between good and evil, heroes and villains, right and wrong might be good «story-wise» but don't reflect the reality most people of
faith actually live in.
Using symbolism exploring
Biblical text, diagrams from scientific hypothesis, and visual psychedelia produced by an influx of cultural influence seemingly aimed at searching for the «unknown» the work serves as a catalyst to further reflect upon topics of belief and wonder as intellectual and spiritual intersections
between fact and
faith.
A
Biblical thread runs through this album, weaving
faith and emotive frankness into this tapestry of senses, addressing the relationship
between past and future.
About Blog BioLogos invites the church and the world to see harmony
between science and
biblical faith as we present an evolutionary understanding of God's creation.
Our ministry shares
biblical truths about the link
between faith and health.
Based on secular research, his own experience as a counselor, surveys, and personal interviews, he provides
biblical perspectives on the differences
between men and women, rekindling love in difficult times, sexual intimacy, habits of unhealthy marriages, fidelity, and the role of
faith in marriage.