There is a difference
between calorie dense and nutrient dense food.
Not exact matches
In my recent «Count colors, not
calories» post, I probably should have clarified a few things... like cauliflower and how there's a difference
between foods that are white like ranch dressing or sour cream, as opposed to nutrient -
dense cauliflower.
For overall development of muscle (that
dense matter that rips through
calories like a hurricane) and fat loss, most of your reps should be
between six and 12.
At least I know I feel way better (and my temperature has risen since doing this) by letting at least 12h
between the end of my dinner and the beginning my breakfast, while of course eating lots of
calorie / nutrient
dense foods during the day.
Minimally we would need a consistent distinction
between the sense of palatability / gratification / satisfaction on one side and food reward in the sense of making you want more (of the same food / of
calorie dense food...)-- often cooccuring but very different concepts.
Most regular maintenance diets are very
calorie -
dense and contain
between 400 and 500
calories per cup or can — making it very easy to overfeed your dog and therefore, fail at weight loss attempts.
Keep in mind though that you will need to feed far less of a
calorie dense food with high digestibility such as Orijen, so the price difference
between a super premium food and a mainstream brand isn't actually as big as it would seem.
Factors that can contribute to a dog eating too many
calories include being fed table scraps, snacks and other treats
between meals, being fed energy -
dense, high - fat, highly palatable commercial diets, or simply being fed too much of a well - balanced diet.