«The sooner policymakers better understand these associations
between calorie labeling and weight loss, the closer we will all be to making better food choices.»
Not exact matches
The results showed no interaction
between the use of
calorie recommendations and the pre-existing menu
labels, suggesting that incorporating
calorie recommendations did not help customers make better use of the information provided on
calorie -
labeled menus.
«This is the first field - based study of mandatory menu
labeling laws that found a large overall adjusted difference in
calories between customers who dined at
labeled restaurants when compared to unlabeled restaurants — about 155 fewer
calories purchased,» said Amy Auchincloss, PhD, an assistant professor in the Drexel University School of Public Health and lead author of the study.
The goal is to shrink the gap
between food and exercise and to help people understand how
calories fit into their everyday life, and Cramer is betting that the
labels have staying power.
And if you read the
labels, there's not a big difference in
calories between reduced and full - fat peanut butter.
Check out the difference
between the
calorie content of the light blue puka puka chicken
label (now being outmoded) and the «new and improved» (HA!)