During the search, I would find that most churches had the same problem: a practical disconnect
between church practices and the need to love my direct neighbor.
Not exact matches
In her book, Melanie Ross has provided us with an affectionate framing of evangelical liturgical
practices that will surely bring a greater and much - needed clarity to the conversation
between evangelicals and high -
church Christians, if not a greater sympathy.
``... [the] gulf
between the
Church and the scientific mind... widens with each generation, and modern means of diffusing knowledge by the press, radio, and film, have brought us now to such a pass that the Christian, and especially the Catholic, whose beliefs are enriched in their religious manifestation by the ceremonies and
practices of a most ancient past, finds himself considered the initiate of a recondite cult whose
practices are not only unintelligible to men around him, but savour to them of superstition and magic.»
Therefore, they seek to drive a wedge
between the
Church's pastoral
practice and her doctrine.
An alliance
between the Catholic and Orthodox
Churches, which share much more in terms of
practice and spirituality, would make more sense.
The 1938 report Doctrine in the
Church of England says that «every individual ought to test his or her belief in
practice and, so far as his or her ability and training allow, to think out his or her own belief and to distinguish
between what has been accepted on authority only and what has been appropriated in thought or experience».23 Such an emphasis has to allow for variety of belief and view within the community.
The signers pledged to offer one another a network of mutual support» as they celebrate instances of faithfulness in their various
churches and challenge
church practices that «presume a smooth fit
between killing and discipleship.»
While the radical Christian tends to identify «religion» with the established beliefs and
practices of the Christian
Church, it is nonetheless true that a new form of Christianity appears in the radical Christian which establishes a new and deeper gulf
between Christianity itself and the world of non-Christian religion.
For given not only the sinfulness but also the limitations of human beings, there will always be a difference
between the official morality proclaimed by the
Church and that which is
practiced by the average Christian.
If in relatively normal circumstances there is too great a gap
between the theoretical morality of the
Church and what is actually
practiced even by good Catholics, the
Church will have to ask herself whether she has really done all that was necessary as far as the working out of her doctrine in pastoral
practice is concerned.
As an Evangelical Presbyterian
Church, Warehouse 242 is by doctrine and
practice somewhere
between the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.), which is considered theologically liberal, and the Presbyterian
Church in America, which broke off in the early 1970s to maintain a more traditionalist approach.
It would be nice to go back and sit in on the conversations
between Constantine and
church leaders about why they did what they did to adopt certain
practices and customs.
What I find so maddening in my efforts to negotiate the barriers
between my Protestantism and my seminarians» Catholicism is that while we are united in so many of our convictions and
practices, we are divided by differences real enough to make the Omega Point almost as remote as in the bad old days of open hostility
between our
churches.
Though many married couples who use artificial contraception, along with divorced and remarried Catholics and gays, continue to participate in the life of the
church, the great discrepancy
between Catholic teaching and Catholic
practice has called into question the credibility of the hierarchical teaching office.
In Europe, a sharp dividing line has been drawn
between religious belief and religious
practice, so that Christians are frequently reminded that they can believe whatever they like and do what they like inside their
churches — they simply can not speak about or act on those beliefs in public.
What these men have in mind was expressed by one of them who said in effect: The seminary prepared me for preaching and taught me the difference
between preaching and public speaking; it helped me to become a pastoral counselor and not simply a counselor; it prepared me for the work of Christian education; but it gave me no preparation to administer a
church as Church; what I learned about church administration was a nontheological smattering of successful business prac
church as
Church; what I learned about church administration was a nontheological smattering of successful business prac
Church; what I learned about
church administration was a nontheological smattering of successful business prac
church administration was a nontheological smattering of successful business
practices.
Is the ongoing secularization of Western peoples due to the gap
between the teaching of Jesus and the
practice of the Christian
churches?
I see a danger that the
churches will divide
between those that rigidly maintain the doctrines and
practices of the past and those that enter a decadent mainstream.
In this, her second book on marriage during a career in Adult Religious Education in the Diocese of East Anglia, Anita Dowsing seeks to bite a very big bullet indeed: the gap
between the
Church's teaching on key aspects of marriage and the actual beliefs and
practice of many lay Catholics today.
Of course, we read Scripture together in our
churches and work to understand it, but similar
practices of reading and discussing other books in our
churches and neighborhoods can form and strengthen bonds
between us and transform our community and how we live and work together (and interact with other communities, locally and around the globe).
As to discouragement, the great blockade
between theology and the
practice of the
churches is still in place
It is believed to have been written by a collection of unknown authors some time
between the first and second century and contains straightforward guidance on early
church practices and ethics.
This distinction
between essential or perfect, and unessential or imperfect, features in the
church mitigated somewhat the bad effect of the division of Christianity and of its radical separation into two bodies which, by
practicing an irreconcilable hostility, might endanger the cultivation of the Christian religion as such.
Though there was a separation of
church and mission in nineteenth century missionary thinking and
practice, they moved steadily closer in the twentieth century, and by the Willingen Conference in 1952, the missionary movement had come to realize the inseparable relationship
between church and mission.
There is a distinction, of course,
between ecclesiology - the aspect of theology that examines the nature and mission of the
Church - and what the
Church is in
practice.
Chew, a co-defendant in the
church's case, noted that his decision came after months of deliberation and only as a result of the breach
between teaching and
practice he saw at the
church.
The gap
between precept and
practice is often attributed to man's sinfulness and somehow or the other explained away by
Church people.
Among the various longer - range challenges facing
church music in the «90s, four seem to be occupying center stage: the challenge of providing
church musicians in sufficient numbers to meet the needs of parishes throughout the land in almost every denomination; the continued search for musical roots in many denominations; the ongoing debate
between those advocating the worship and musical tradition of the
church catholic and those advocating a variety of trendy fads; and the impact of pragmatism and consumerism in determining worship
practice and musical style and substance.
The ecumenical conversations
between the World Alliance of Reformed
Churches and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity distinguished three contemporary Reformed attitudes toward the Roman Catholic
Church: of those who remain unconvinced that the Catholic
Church has actually dealt with the fundamental issues that divided Rome and the Reformation, those who «have not been challenged or encouraged to reconsider their traditional stance» and remain «largely untouched by the ecumenical exchanges of recent times,» and those who have engaged «in a fresh constructive and critical evaluation both of the contemporary teaching and
practice of the Roman Catholic
Church and of the classical controverted issues.»
It is possible, for example, that the fundamental Catholic theoretical doctrine of the primacy may continue to exist as ground for division
between Christian denominations but that at the same time the historical situation will impose on the Catholic
Church, with the quiet inevitability of an inescapable environment, an actual
practice of the primacy to which non-Catholics themselves will scarcely be able to raise objection.
Charles E. Curran reflected on how the discrepancy
between official Catholic teaching and Catholic sexual
practice has raised deep questions about the credibility of the
church's teaching office.
The uncertainty surrounding reporting laws may not only reflect complex relations
between church and state; they may also signal uncertainty about the
practice of confidentiality in the
church.
In the end, any theology worthy of the name would need to work out some accommodation
between the structures of the
Church, on the one hand, with its monarchical papal authority, its traditions and
practice, and, on the other, Scripture, the written record of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, together with the records of the life and teachings of the group of His first followers.
The real problem is that much «Wall of Separation» rhetoric implies there is a clear, impregnable line
between church and state activity when in
practice over the twentieth century the principle of
church - state separation has become one of lively democratic contestation and a degree of flexibility, allowing Catholics and other religious organizations to enter the public sphere and participate on the same terms as any other group.
The job title perhaps obscures the immediate relevance of the appointment: as a curator with a reputation for working with cross-disciplinary artists such as performance artist Carolee Schneemann and visionary architectural
practice Archigram, as well as curating substantial survey shows, Bayley is being asked to enable an encounter to take place
between artists,
church and the public.
The instrumental role of the
churches in carrying assimilation policies into effect on behalf of governments creates an interesting point of comparison
between church and some government attitudes towards acknowledging institutional responsibility for past
practices.