First, in the recognition stage of a native title determination, the court will only recognise claims where there has been an ongoing connection
between the claimants and the land.
After Mrs I's death in 2000, her 1996 will was found to leave her entire residuary estate, including her interest in the property, to be divided
between the claimants.
This required the arbitrator to make factual findings concerning the relationship
between the claimants and the insured, in accordance with the arbitrator's interpretation of the relevant insurance policy and statutory provisions.
Presently, costs in class action cases are only awarded against the defendant; this proposed provision further accentuates the difference in treatment
between claimants and defendants.
We look forward to featuring a broad spectrum of views from various international lawyers and scholars on this landmark arbitral award, as we track contemporaneous developments in the Asia - Pacific region, and invite further discussion especially on next steps ahead for the actual disputes
between the claimants on maritime boundary delimitation.
In both cases, the court argued that employers had been entitled to strike a balance
between claimants» rights to manifest their religious beliefs and the rights of others not to suffer discrimination.
Section 31 of the act creates a solicitor and client relationship
between claimant's counsel and the General Manager of OHIP which effectively obliges plaintiffs» counsel in personal injury matters to properly advance the subrogated interests of OHIP when prosecuting and resolving the claims of their injured clients.
This involves the difficult choice
between the claimant either reducing their expenditure, and consequently not applying the damages as anticipated to meet their needs, or taking a greater investment risk, which is quite obviously double - edged.
The subject matter of this personal injury lawsuit was a car accident
between the claimant and a bus which on Terminal Avenue in Vancouver.
Recently the rehabilitation code, which encourages greater collaboration
between claimant lawyers and insurers to address injured people's needs, and provide them with the right treatment as quickly as possible was updated and re-issued.
In the case of Inframatrix Investments Ltd v Dean Construction Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 64 the court held that a limitation period of 12 months on the bringing of any action or proceeding under the contract entered into
between the claimant and respondent was valid.
But once the issue had been decided as
between the claimant office and the estate agents, it was that decision that entitled the claimant to seek an injunction preventing continued use by the agents of that term in future contracts and in existing contracts.
A contract was eventually concluded
between the claimant and the first defendant for the hire of the claimant's tug to assist the first defendant's vessel.
The text on occasion made references to «Auschwitz» and «Nazi uniforms» and drew attention to the links
between the claimant's father and Nazi Germany.
The prevailing doctrine views the litigation funding agreement as a kind of partnership (Gesellschaft)
between claimant and funder.
[71] The respondent says that he was not a party to the arrangements made
between the claimant and her mother for either the townhouse down payment or Mrs. Gurmej Dheenshaw's subsequent contribution of $ 50,000 toward the purchase of 145A Street in April 2004.
There are two glaring reasons why these actions are not ones for which subsection 3 (1)(c) applies: (1) there is no contract
between each claimant and defendant, and (2) the Claimants are asking for $ 25,000 in damages and therefore the claims are ones for which the Claimants believe that damages is an adequate remedy.
The Court reasoned that «to find discrimination there must first be a distinction drawn
between the claimant and others....
The PD seeks to place some degree of regulation on funding arrangements in the jurisdiction without fettering the determination of the claim or the arrangement in place
between claimant, funder and lawyer.
There is no connection
between the claimant's employment and her trip and fall over the ordinary threshold.»
What is effect of contractual arangements
between Claimant's father and his insurer on the availability of SABS to the Claimant?
The defendant argued that there was a relevant exclusion clause in the contract
between the claimant and the defendant, which stipulated that «The maximum amount allowed for lost or damaged articles is twenty times the charge made for laundering.»
The test is whether there is a sufficient nexus
between the claimant and the target insurer.
This was because, over time, the transfer had ceased to be a genuine reason for the pay disparity
between the claimant and her comparator.
This caused some friction
between the claimant and her boss who suggested that the claimant should still ensure that her work was to the desired standard stating, «We will probably bump into each other in future, unless you are married off in India».
If benefits are denied, a claimant can enter in a Dispute
between the claimant and the insurance.
Successfully defended a Connecticut attorney in a court trial for damages on claims of improperly interfering with a business relationship
between the claimant and the attorney's client
The appeal was also based on the argument that the judge should have had regard to the fact that there was no evidence that «a hypothetical child» who did meet the manufacturer's criteria would have been safe on a booster seat, and that it was not established that the discrepancy
between the claimant's height and those dictated by the manual instruction made any material difference to her injuries.
It's an emotive subject and referral fees have been a dividing factor
between the claimant and defendant sides of the profession since the ban on referral fees was lifted in March 2004.
There were three aspects to such agreements: (i) a CFA
between the claimant and a solicitor; (ii) the availability of a loan from a funder to cover the claimant's disbursements and other costs; and (iii) insurance to cover the claimant for his own disbursements, the defendant's costs, the insurance premium and the loan interest should the claim fail.
In the Keynote Speech at the Law Society Litigation Conferences in June 2003, Lord Phillips, then Master of the Rolls, referred to «warfare
between claimant and defence interests» as a result of costs - only proceedings, which led to the courts «not only being clogged with this completely unproductive and expensive satellite litigation but the conciliatory approach to dispute resolution, which the Woolf reforms sought to engender, was being poisoned».
Essentially, this release is a contract
between the claimant and the insurance company in which the insurance company provides payment of medical bills and pain and suffering in exchange for the agreement of the claimant to discharge forever any kind of lawsuit against you, the insured.
There may be communication
between the claimant and the company during the process for the sake of clarification.
Understanding reasons for and approaches to reconciling the inconsistencies
between claimant and provider perspectives is a complex task.
Not exact matches
Other measures include: • remove rule limiting Child Tax Credit (CTC) to one
claimant per household (to allow two or more families sharing a house to claim the CTC); • repeal $ 10,000 cap on medical expense tax credit claims made on medical costs incurred for an eligible dependent; • easier access to funds in Registered Disability Savings Plans for beneficiaries with shortened life spans; • improved Employment Insurance benefits to parents of gravely ill, murdered, or missing children; and • enhanced ability to make transfers
between individual RESPs, and better access to RESP funds for post-secondary students studying outside Canada.
For example, a job offering a salary of $ 13 / hour could be rejected by a
claimant if the hourly wage normally paid for the same type of job in its region was
between $ 16 - 18.
While this may look great in terms of headline statistics, simply cycling vulnerable
claimants between different benefits or short spells of work before returning to benefits is completely ineffective, both for the
claimant and the taxpayer.
There is also a worrying failure to recognise that some error leads to underpayments of benefits and tax credits, and this issue needs to be tackled too, to ensure balance
between HMRC and
claimants.
So, the unearned wealth of an individual who is fortunate enough to receive a large inheritance, or to have profitable investments etc, is rather different from the unearned wealth of the - for example - benefits
claimant that has done
between little and nothing to find a job (I am not saying all benefits
claimants fall into this category, or even the majority; but to note that the system is occasionally abused is hardly a controversial statement).
«Although the
claimant has a legal obligation to report changes to their circumstances, we often encounter
claimants who quite reasonably assume that this kind of information is shared within and
between Government departments.
This is certainly happening more frequently and means there is a confusing landscape for
claimants and a mismatch
between the legal framework and the operational practice.
Between April and July 2009, 1,200 Jobseeker's Allowance
claimants reaching six months of unemployment took up volunteering placements through a new national brokerage service.
Introducing cards for benefit
claimants would have precisely the same effect, deepening the division
between «shirkers» and «strivers».
The analysis No one disputed today that the number of people on the dole — the
claimant count — fell
between April and May.
A group of claims handlers found that, over a 12 - month period
between mid-2013 and mid-2014, up to 30 % of PPI offers made by some providers included comparative redress, with
claimants affected being about # 730 worse off on average.
It is interesting that, in finding no such reasonable doubt in this case, the court relied heavily on an affidavit submitted by Mr. Haigh describing his relationship with the firm, and the ongoing conflict checks he conducted which did not disclose the relationship
between the firm's client and the
claimant in the arbitration.
``... the species of constructive trust based on «common intention» is established by what Lord Bridge in Lloyds Bank v Rosset [1991] 1 AC 107 at 132, called an «agreement, arrangement or understanding» actually reached
between the parties, and relied on and acted on by the
claimant.
So even if the defence of necessity to trespass had been established the high - handed approach of the
claimant meant that he had not struck the right balance
between the different facets of public interest in the case.
In Elkamet Kunststofftechnik GmbH v Saint - Gobain Glass France S.A. [2016] EWHC 3421 (Pat)-- involving a successful German
claimant — the court was asked to make an additional costs order due to the decline in the exchange rate
between the pound and the euro since the proceedings were launched and, in particular, since the referendum.
Given the close relationship
between Shell and the Nigerian government, the
claimants argued that they would never get justice in a Nigerian court if they sued SPDC.