Intuitively I consider that the dichotomy
between classical physics (for macro events) and quantum phsics (for sub-atomic particle events) is false.
In 1964, physicist John Bell took on this seeming disparity
between classical physics and quantum mechanics, stating that if the universe is based on classical physics, the measurement of one entangled particle should not affect the measurement of the other — a theory, known as locality, in which there is a limit to how correlated two particles can be.
Not exact matches
Thus the Inconsistency
between Bohr's quantum theory and the assumptions of
classical physics worried some physicists very much when it was first proposed, whereas others thought this inconsistency of little importance compared to the accuracy of the predictions which it yielded.
There will usually be enough overlap
between the assumptions of the two parties that a common core of observations - statements can be accepted by both — even, I would argue, in a change as far - reaching as that from
classical physics to relativity.
Historians of philosophy can easily demonstrate how this Kantian distinction of an unavailable noumenal world from a vivid, but frothy, phenomenal one, is erected upon the distinction in
classical physics between primary and secondary qualities.
It applies in vastly diverse contexts; it even helps bridge the divide
between classical and quantum
physics.
While the strong sigma or covalent bonds were explained by the new theories of quantum mechanics, hydrogen bonds were seen as nothing more than an electrostatic attraction
between charged particles and were explained according the principles of
classical physics.
This explanation is reminiscent of the quantum explanation of why — in
classical physics — light always takes the shortest path
between any two points.
«Physicists blur the line
between classical and quantum
physics by connecting chaos and entanglement.»
Physicists have since struggled to establish a clear boundary
between our everyday world — which is governed by
classical physics — and this strangeness of the quantum world.
The real value of the experiment may be in probing the boundary
between quantum mechanics and
classical physics.
Somewhere
between molecules and pears lies a boundary where the strangeness of quantum behavior ends and the familiarity of
classical physics begins.
«Principles of Mechanics: Fundamental University
Physics» has been designed to provide students with an invaluable go - to resource on
classical mechanics that bridges the gaps
between basic and more advanced learning.
Thus the concept of substance in
classical physics combined the Scholastic concept of substance with the distinction
between primary and secondary qualities.
If I may use an analogy from your expertise, it's as if, in an engineering issue governed by
classical physics — say the construction of a bridge
between Vancouver and Victoria — you claimed, during a lecture on eng» g principles, that it could be readily and cheaply done because of some principle that you've recently discovered, through your own investigations, which happens to be contrary to one of Newton's law's.