Look, many in the country see and understand the connection
between conservative organizations like ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) and Republican privatization policies.
Not exact matches
I'd like to share a few thoughts about the conversation, or lack thereof,
between traditional /
conservative Christian institutions (e.g., churches, Christian universities, Christian
organizations) and the gay community.
One of the consistent differences
between the two is that the Boy Scouts have always been a much more
conservative organization; even on moves that have widespread support, the Boy Scouts will often lag anywhere from ten to thirty years behind the Girl Scouts.
The National Press Club event will mark the latest in the complicated dance of distance and embrace
between the nation's premier
conservative legal
organization and a man who professionally benefited from his association with the group but then used his considerable cachet to further a cause opposed by many of its members.
The World Council had more success in bridging the gap
between the Churches of a more
conservative theological orientation and those of a more liberal orientation than had any previous pan-Protestant
organization.
Further, strong
conservative position wants to know why the government is involved in the recognition of «marriages» to begin with; leave marriages to the individual and their chosen
organization, and only focus on an orderly protection of the contracting / association rights
between those individuals.
The consensus appears to be that these higher levels of performance have less to do with policy than with everything else: the «ecosystem» of reform in a given place (usually a city) and its network of «human - capital providers,» expert charter - management
organizations, leadership - development programs, school - incubator efforts, local funders and civic leaders, etc. — in other words, what
conservatives like to call «civil society»: the space
between the government and the individual (in this case,
between government and individual schools).
In October, InsideClimate News reported that a group of Democratic senators wrote a letter to Exxon «questioning Exxon's contributions to Donors Trust and the Donors Capital Fund, which provide a conduit
between well - heeled contributors and various
conservative public policy
organizations, including many at the forefront of climate science denial.»
Mr. Soros, who heads the Open Society Foundations, contributed over $ 36 million
between 2000 and 2014 to 18 of the 55
organizations on the march's steering committee, according to an analysis released Friday by the
conservative Media Research Center.
This coalition of U.S
organizations is working to change the politics of clean energy in that country by highlighting the alignment
between renewable power production and
conservative values.