Sentences with phrase «between creationists»

I too watched the Dover doco, and the similarity between Creationists and Denialists is uncanny.

Texas remains a battleground state in the clash between creationists and scientists over science education standards.

I'd prefer not to frame the issue the way that suits you, and just stick to my original points, namely, that a certain parallel possibly exists between creationists and climate skeptics.

We are interested in those trends, those phenomena — for example, the struggle between creationists and evolutionists.

It is only the Protestant dogma of Sola Scriptura (scripture alone) that has led to the rancorous debate between creationists and science.

This whole argument between creationists and evolutionists is equivilant to a group of ignorant children / teenagers arguing with fully grown, educated adults.

One of the issues between Creationists vs. Darwin has been the perfection of evolution or the designs of living things, the perfection was created by God vs. the perfection was created through evolution.

Between the creationists» claims concerning human origins and those of neo-Darwinists, truth is more evenly divided than our nation realizes.

Not exact matches

Don't confuse the creationist... They refuse to understand the difference between science and religion... how can you expect them to understand the difference between a century and a millennium?

Dalahast, are you a creationist or an evolutionist, or somewhere in between?

Creationists want to claim evolution can only work by gradulism and thus should have many half transformed species in between each current species.

Mutation and natural selection is such a powerful and creative «designer» that ID / creationists still have no viable means to distinguish between «actual design» from «apparent design.»

First a Noah's Ark discovery raised a flood of questions, then there was the much - hyped debate over life's origins between Bill Nye the Science Guy and creationist Ken Ham.

Rather than carefully distinguishing between evolution and evolutionism, and between science and scientism, the creationists concede everything from the start.

Old - Earth Creationists: Somewhere between 10,000 and 20 billion years It's hard to pin these folks down, but they generally accept some form of day - age interpretation for the creation days of Genesis 1.

You might not accept this as logical and maybe a few Creationist would also reject this view of seeing the parallels between Creationism and Evolutionism.

It does not help things, either, that most members of Group 2 do not distinguish clearly between Groups 3 and 4, generally taking them both to be just as misguided as creationists are.

Unfortunately, efforts to push forward a careful alliance of theology with evolutionary biology are often obscured by the more sensational spats going on between IDT defenders and creationists on the one side, and evolutionary materialists on the other.

She also labels Michael Behe of the Intelligent Design school a Creationist, given his apparent affirmation of the distinction between «direct» creation of some phenomena and the «autopilot» mode of others.

Young Earth Creationists say the weeklong account of God creating the earth and everything in it represents six 24 - hour periods (plus one day of rest) and date the age of the earth between 6,000 and 10,000 years.

But the difference between a scientist and a creationist is that the scientist allows the conclusions to come from the evidence.

CNN's Tom Foreman moderated the «creation debate» Tuesday night in Petersburg, Kentucky, between Bill «the Science Guy» Nye and creationist Ken Ham.

There were of course theologians who were outspoken Creationists, but plenty of theologians who I had come to deeply respect saw absolutely no contradiction between biblical faithfulness and the science of evolution.

Altogether, Inherit the Wind supplies the view most Americans have of the Scopes Trial, and it often surfaces in response to some development in the never - ending quarrels between evolutionists and creationists.

I read an exchange in The Creation Research Society Quarterly between two young - earth creationists, Henry Morris and Robert Kofahl, in which the latter argued that the Second Law of Thermodynamics must have existed in Eden before the Fall because the animals and Adam had to break down the molecules in the food they ate, and the necessary biochemical reactions would not occur without the Second Law of Thermodynamics being in effect.

Webb's conservative position on gun laws is well - known, but here he is on evolution: «This confrontation between religious and scientific theories is still unsettled even today, as creationists rationally argue that the living world could not have been fashioned without an «intelligent designer,» and that the theory of evolution as presented by the Darwinists still rests on scientific speculation that has yet to be proven.»

The fossils form such a neatly graded series, getting less and less ape - like and more and more human as they get closer in time to the present, that the most earnest creationist can do little more than muddy the waters by inflating and distorting the existence of points of disagreement between specialists, or trying to revive long since discredited Homo sapiens specimens once claimed to have been from extremely ancient deposits.

Because of the obvious humanness of the Turkana Boy fossil, and the fact that H. erectus brain sizes overlap the extreme lower range of modern human brain sizes, creationists have nowadays almost entirely abandoned the old line (popularized by Duane Gish) that Peking Man and Java Man are apes, and now generally claim that Homo erectus fossils are a variant form of modern humans (ignoring the inconvenient fact that there are many obvious differences between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens).

Wally says: «Now you want draw up more BS parallels between climate skeptics (oh yes, this special brand of skeptics) and creationists regarding blogs or media.»

About a decade or more ago I was active on the evolution - creationists forums and encountered a cross-relationship between those rejecting evolution and the common ancestry of man / apes and those rejecting the findings of climate science.

Now you want draw up more BS parallels between climate skeptics (oh yes, this special brand of skeptics) and creationists regarding blogs or media.

This reminds me of creationists and transitional fossils — fossils that are transitional in form between two groups of animal.