Compared the psychological functioning of mothers
between diagnostic groups on measures of parenting sense of competence, coping, marital adjustment, family functioning, mother - child relationship, and social support.
Not exact matches
They also found many metabolites had statistically significant differences in pair-wise comparisons
between the three
diagnostic groups.
«Although there appears to be a generally high level of agreement
between the two
diagnostic classification systems in that nearly all individuals with a severe AUD per the DSM - 5 received an ICD - 10 dependence diagnosis,» added Proctor, «there are likely some very important individual differences
between the two
groups in terms of their clinical presentation.
Heebner leads the Ultrafast Optical and Electronics Systems
Group, whose members support multiple Lab programs and are pioneering
diagnostic techniques bridging the gap
between ultrafast optics (subpicosecond) and high - bandwidth electronics (> 10 GHz).
This definition creates a
group of children with considerable language needs who fall
between diagnostic categories; it leaves children with both verbal and non-verbal difficulties at a double disadvantage, with limited specialist support.
As was the case with the internalizing / externalizing scales, many of these broad - band measures have successfully discriminated
between different
diagnostic groups (concurrent / predictive validity) and they tend to be significantly associated with other measures purported to be measuring the same constructs (i.e., convergent validity; range =.03 — .92; median =.42).
Furthermore, although some studies have revealed significant
group differences, the degree of within
group variance and overlap
between groups make imaging of little use for individual
diagnostic purposes.
Peer nominations of aggressive - disruptive behavior and one parent measure (the
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children) yielded no significant differences
between the two
groups.
The results revealed that (1) for females and males, higher levels of depressive symptoms correlated with a more depressive attributional style; (2) females and males who met
diagnostic criteria for a current depressive disorder evidenced more depres - sogenic attributions than psychiatric controls, and never and past depressed adolescents; (3) although no sex differences in terms of attributional patterns for positive events, negative events, or for positive and negative events combined emerged, sex differences were revealed on a number of dimensional scores; (4) across the Children's Attributional Style Questionnaire (CASQ) subscale and dimensional scores, the relation between attributions and current self - reported depressive symptoms was stronger for females than males; and (5) no Sex × Diagnostic Group Status interaction effects emerged for CASQ subscale or dimension
diagnostic criteria for a current depressive disorder evidenced more depres - sogenic attributions than psychiatric controls, and never and past depressed adolescents; (3) although no sex differences in terms of attributional patterns for positive events, negative events, or for positive and negative events combined emerged, sex differences were revealed on a number of dimensional scores; (4) across the Children's Attributional Style Questionnaire (CASQ) subscale and dimensional scores, the relation
between attributions and current self - reported depressive symptoms was stronger for females than males; and (5) no Sex ×
Diagnostic Group Status interaction effects emerged for CASQ subscale or dimension
Diagnostic Group Status interaction effects emerged for CASQ subscale or dimensional scores.
There was no significant difference in anxiety and depression
between the two
groups, or in PTSD measured by the clinician administered PTSD
diagnostic scale (adjusted mean difference for anxiety subscale HADS: CBT v usual care 0.3, 95 % CI − 1.0 to 1.6; adjusted mean difference for depression subscale HADS: CBT v usual care 0.5, 95 % CI − 0.8 to 1.9; adjusted mean difference for clinician administered PTSD
diagnostic scale: CBT v usual care − 6.6, 95 % CI − 13.6 to 0.4).
Path analysis was conducted to examine the relation
between strategy use and symptom severity across
diagnostic groups.