Furthermore, the relationship
between disruptive child behaviors and negative mood was moderated by daily parenting stress; on more stressful days, higher levels of disruptive behaviors predicted higher levels of daily negative mood.
Not exact matches
Witnessing conflict
between the parents is very
disruptive to
children's adjustment.
Sometimes it's simply too
disruptive for the
child to regularly move back and forth
between parents» homes to allow for a 50/50 split physical custody arrangement.
While the concepts are simple and logical, the outcomes are extraordinary: improved relationship
between child and caregiver, reduction of
disruptive behaviors, improved speech and communication skills, reduction of parental stress and enhanced self - esteem.
This is reassuring, in that it justifies the decision of many parents to keep their
children in charter schools once they are there; the
disruptive effects of moving
between schools would make the return to a traditional public school counterproductive.
This included: attendance levels (studies show a positive relationship
between participation in sports and school attendance); behaviour (research concludes that even a little organised physical activity, either inside or outside the classroom, has a positive effect on classroom behaviour, especially amongst the most
disruptive pupils); cognitive function (several studies report a positive relationship
between physical activity and cognition, concentration, attention span and perceptual skills); mental health (studies indicate positive impacts of physical activity on mood, well - being, anxiety and depression, as well as on
children's self - esteem and confidence); and attainment (a number of well - controlled studies conclude that academic achievement is maintained or enhanced by increased physical activity).
Differences
between conditions at follow - up displayed precisely the same pattern of results noted here, with the following exceptions: (1) change in ECBI Intensity Scale score from baseline to the 6 - month follow - up was statistically significant
between WL and PTG, but the ECBI Problem Scale score was not, and (2) change in the DPICS - CII
child disruptive behavior at posttreament was significant in the NR - PTG condition.
No differences were found
between baseline and posttreatment in the WL condition, but both
child disruptive behavior and negative parenting were lower at the 12 - month follow - up.
A total of 273 parents of
children between 2 and 4 years old who acknowledged
disruptive behaviors on a 20 - item checklist were included.
Distilling Heterogeneity among
Children with
Disruptive Behavior: Associations
between Symptom Patterns and Social Functioning.
Preschool teachers in low - income neighborhoods report that
between 15 and 20 percent of the young
children in their classrooms exhibit clinically high levels of
disruptive and challenging behaviors.
Target Population: Parents and caregivers of
children with
disruptive behavior
between 18 months and 18 years of age; can be used with parents and caregivers of
children without
disruptive behavior
between 18 months and 18 years of age as a preventive or early intervention
Results showed that there was a significant group difference on reported
child disruptive behaviors
between the TP group compared with the WL group.
Results indicate significant interactions
between treatment conditions (NFPP vs. HNC) and
child ODD diagnosis (presence vs. absence) indicated that based on some parent and teacher reports, HNC was more effective with
disruptive behaviors than NFPP but only when
children had a comorbid diagnosis.
Poor regulatory abilities often place the
child at risk of developing pathologies such as
disruptive behaviour problems or ADHD.9 In relation to behaviour problems, it is important to distinguish
between reactive aggression (emotionally - driven conduct problems) and proactive aggression (unprovoked, unemotional aggression that is used for personal gain or to influence and coerce others).
Peer nominations of aggressive -
disruptive behavior and one parent measure (the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for
Children) yielded no significant differences
between the two groups.
The relations
between emotional understanding, intellectual functioning, and
disruptive behavior problems in elementary - school - aged
children
In the current study, statistical analyses evaluated the main and moderating effects of variables measured repeatedly at the within - person level (stress, social support, and unsupportive interactions) and variables measured at the
between - person level (
disruptive child behaviors, and support services) on daily positive and negative mood.
Moderating predictions were more tentative; it was predicted that instrumental social support and support services would buffer the relationship
between daily parenting stress and daily negative mood, whereas unsupportive interactions and
disruptive child behaviors would intensify the effect of daily parenting stress on daily negative mood.
Higher levels of
disruptive child behaviors predicted more daily negative mood (β = 0.05, p <.01), but the association
between disruptive behaviors and daily positive mood was not significant.
Parents should take care to remember their
child is also dealing with their parent's separation, and making a
child yo - yo back and forth
between parents too many times a week, may take an emotional toll on the
child, and may be
disruptive to the
child's routine school schedule.