Who owns the history of video art —
between epistemology and the movies, art and science?
This of course will be clarified when you look into the distinction
between epistemology and ontology.
Not exact matches
Just a word about the relation
between Luther's theology of the cross and the contemporary proposal that lam calling an «
epistemology of the cross.»
The framework for knowing that I will propose — what I call an «
epistemology of the cross» — emerges from a conversation
between secular feminist philosophers of knowing and Luther's theology of the cross.
In so doing he fails to see the integral relation
between Buber's anthropology and his I - Thou
epistemology.
Already in The Idea of Nature, he made a distinction
between Whitehead's realism and that of the analytic philosophy.23 In An Autobiography, he radicalizes that distinction, interpreting Whitehead's realism as contradictory to the realistic
epistemology of the neo - positivists.24 Hence, he concludes that Whitehead's cosmology is in fact constructed on an anti-realistic principle (EM 176).
The Church Fathers relied heavily on the Gospel of John in their «
epistemology,» and especially on John's conjunction
between «seeing» and «knowing.»
The investigation of the relationship
between fat and perception is not a matter, I suppose, that formal
epistemology concerns itself with; but in its words about the knowledge of God the biblical account is steeped in it.
According to the intention of its founder, genetic
epistemology should examine how scientific thinking, as it pertains to the established sciences, becomes possible in the development of the individual from child to adult; genetic
epistemology should further ask about the relationships
between this ontogenetic process and the phylogenetic process of the history of humankind as the history of science.
«The forms of a living being are not but rather come to be,» says Ludwig von Bertalanffy (BW 120), and his «organismic» biology and later general system - theory for overcoming the opposition
between mechanism and vitalism has given central insights of Whitehead a new formulation on the basis of science, 8 Something similar holds for all the directions of research which Jean Piaget has brought to the [264] concept of genetic structuralism.9 The genetic
epistemology founded by Piaget has proved through empirical research on the problem of knowledge the fruitfulness both of genetic analysis and of Whitehead's principle of process.
Hence one of literature's cultural obligations is to encourage an ongoing effort to distinguish
between valid and bogus nonlinear
epistemologies.
To this end, the editors have included essays dealing with the historical connections
between Wesleyan and process theology, the God - human relationship, the doctrine of the Trinity, concepts of divine power,
epistemology, aesthetics, and the appropriate human responses to divine grace.
The following quotation from his writings shows that he rejected this latter form of
epistemology that had resurfaced in the twentieth century under the guise of Transcendental Thomism, because he was acutely aware that this path led at least to a blurring of the distinction
between nature and grace if not to pantheism: «What we must not do -LSB-...] is to relate God as «ground of being» to the very inner substance and core of the soul as in some way... a part or aspect of the creature's being.»
Critical scholars can not ignore such voices for they underline the necessity of moving beyond interpretations that view the politics of building peace as driven by a Manichean split
between liberal and illiberal political
epistemologies.
In the early eighties Donald A. Schon, in his book The Reflective Practitioner, brought attention to the gap «
between the kinds of knowledge honoured in academia and the kinds of competence valued in professional practice» and proposed an
epistemology of practice he called reflection - in - action.
When it becomes applied
epistemology, it creates subtle psychological relationships
between people and objects that evolve over time as experience.
She questions the distinction in scientific disciplines
between the theory of knowledge (
epistemology) and the study of the nature of being (ontology).
He continues to blur the boundaries
between art and science through his investigation into ontology,
epistemology and entropy; creating a cross-disciplinary and multi-dimensional dialogue to engage, question, meditate and explore.By juxtaposing humanity's various pools of knowledge and culture, Joo addresses the fluid nature of identity itself.
Greene's canvases unite those disparate and sometimes deliberately kitschy interests — and the weighty themes of gender, sexuality and
epistemology that accompany them — in his distinctly serious and polished practice, creating a compelling tension
between the two aesthetics.
The linkages
between philosophy of science and psychology in context of
epistemology is articulated in this statement by Quine:
epistemology itself «falls into place as a chapter of psychology and hence of natural science»: the point is not that
epistemology should simply be abandoned in favor of psychology, but instead that there is ultimately no way to draw a meaningful distinction
between the two.
Between real discussions of
epistemology and logics and «elegant statements,» there's a gap that Mr. T can't hide.
«
Epistemology is here applied to problems of statistical inference during testing, the relationship
between the underlying physics and the models, the epistemic meaning of ensemble statistics, problems of spatial and temporal scale, the existence or not of an unforced null for climate fluctuations, the meaning of existing uncertainty estimates, and other issues.