Sentences with phrase «between fidelity of implementation»

An outgrowth of the AES's evaluation work with UCLA's National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing is a CRESST study highlighting the relationship between fidelity of implementation and student test scores in magnet schools in five school districts evaluated by the AES - CRESST team for the 2010 MSAP grant cycle.

Not exact matches

Identifying core components of interventions found to be effective and understanding what it takes to implement those components with fidelity to the program model is critical to successful replication and scale - up of effective programs and practices in different community contexts and populations.7 There is growing recognition in the early childhood field of the importance of effective implementation and the need for implementation research that can guide adoption, initial implementation, and ongoing improvement of early childhood interventions.8, 9,10 The promise of implementation research and using data to drive program management is compelling because it offers a potential solution to the problem of persistent gaps in outcomes between at - risk children and their more well - off peers.

Previous research has suggested a relationship between teachers» self - efficacy and fidelity of implementation (Keys & Bryan, 2000).

Although fidelity of implementation monitoring has shown Science IDEAS classrooms to be affectively positive, this advanced component student motivation strategy is designed to make the linkage between conceptual learning in science (or increasing proficiency in reading comprehension) and student recognition of achievement progress more explicit on a continuing basis.

These results are supported by fidelity findings from the structured observations (N = 27) carried out in a sample of classes over the course of the study (observations: mean number of observed activities full implementation = 90.9 %; partial implementation = 2.3 %; activities not implemented = 6.8 %) Given that there was no significant difference in the level of programme adherence between the intervention groups, the impact results were analysed by comparing the intervention group's results (i.e. intervention Type I combined with intervention Type II) with the control group's results.

Results: Three overarching themes were identified from Stage One, including: (1) «Experiences of learned helplessness» (e.g. the association between child conduct problems and family conflict and social isolation); (2) «Perceived benefits and mechanisms of change» (e.g. the links between positive outcomes and a number of factors, including key parenting skills, social support, longer - term resilience and commitment, and facilitative organisational practices); and (3) «Challenges in programme implementation» (e.g. cultural discomfort with praise and positive attention, conflict with partners; and organisational difficulties with fidelity, attrition and sustainability).

The findings indicate that the key drivers of successful implementation include: (1) compatibility between intervention and agency goals; (2) intra - and inter-agency supports to enhance fidelity, retention of parents, and leverage of funding; and (3) careful attention paid to group composition and screening for parental readiness to attend the program.