(1) In my section of that book I say that film studies has opened up a huge gap
between film criticism and academic, theoretical writing on film.
There's a difference
between film criticism and film reviews anyway, and it is film reviews that the Tomatometer tends to capture: those first - blush, yay - or - nay, thumbs - up - or - down judgments on whether or not a film is worth an audience's time and money.
Not exact matches
For Muslim terrorists, there is no difference
between any reasonable, based on facts,
criticism of their religion, on the one hand, and hateful and provocative statements such as those included in the above mentioned
film.
On the other hand, the pause
between the two
films» release would have given Tarantino ample time to address some of the
criticisms that were made of Volume 1 - its episodic story, lack of three - dimensional characters, needless editing gimmicks and so on.
It is interesting that visual artists have drawn on the richness of
film titles, exploring the relationship
between text and image in this context, but this is not a subject that has generated much interest in the area of
film criticism.
Of all the things to pin the decline of professional
film criticism as a career choice on, from changing audience - tastes to the globalization of the theatrical marketplace to the collapse of traditional media outlets overall, the Great Threat is actually... a college - age kid in a funny hat cracking wise (in
between actual critical insights, mind you) about Antonioni?
Of course there's a thin line everywhere
between most
film criticism and publicity, but Hong Kong hype and jive is unusually intense.
Yet the
criticism that Sayles» stand off
between union and company is too black and white is confounded by close examination of the
film.
The metaphysical, stylistic, musical, and directorial steps Rivette takes have everything to do with his legacy as a
film critic, despite the fact that he wrote and published
criticism only
between 1950 and 1969.
Fan sites were born in worship of these
films and slowly but surely those fan sites took over the dialogue about
film and pretty soon there wasn't a lot of difference
between fandom and
film criticism.
Adapting the novel for the big screen, director Taylor - Johnson has had to navigate a high wire
between its hard - core pornographic elements, its global popularity,
criticism of its sexual violence and
film as a profitable commercial venture.
The parallels
between the two are strong enough for claims that this was as much a remake as a sequel to emerge as one of the biggest of the few
criticisms leveled against the
film.
Technically, there is a difference
between film reviewing and
film criticism.
With fairly cursory critical discussions, perpetual plot synopses, and adjective - driven lauding («an acidulous commentary on class» or «a masterclass in
film acting,» to name a couple) in place of detail - driven social
criticism, Forshaw has placed himself
between a Brighton Rock (1947) and a Kill List (2011), casting his historical net too wide for anything more than introductory textual assessment.
A burly figure with a clipboard known as
FILM CRITICISM WORLD BOUNCER stands
between Nathan and the movie theater.
But the most thought - provoking part — by which I mean the part I most vehemently reacted to — is the book's centerpiece titled «Building a large conversation» in which Girish examines the reasons for the large gap
between film studies and
film criticism and reflects on the possibility of bridging it.
We see a documentary about the professional rivalry and growing friendship
between Ebert and his late sparring partner Gene Siskel, whose nationally syndicated television show brought
film criticism into many homes and inspired a few generations of
film lovers — myself included — to watch movies with a critical but appreciating eye.
Davis praises this recent book, and its rethinking of the relation
between film and
film criticism.
Cinephilia, like
film studies and
film criticism, has tended to be torn
between two opposing goals: breaking down the barriers
between disciplines and traditional conceptions of art, and shoring up its own legitimacy by appealing to those very categories it sought to undermine.
Among his most significant themes are: the relationship
between art and language (as in the
film La Pluie, in which water runs down pages erasing the text written by the artist); the status of the work of art and of
criticism in the museum (il Musée d'art moderne — Département des Aigles of 1968 is a museum in which some of the works exhibited are accompanied by the warning «This is not a work of art»); and the play
between reality and fiction.