Develop protocols for managing identification, culling, review, and transfer of relevant data
between foreign jurisdictions and the United States
Not exact matches
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases of admiralty and maritime
Jurisdiction; — to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; — to Controversies
between two or more States; —
between a State and Citizens of another State; —
between Citizens of different States; —
between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and
between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and
foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
Under the minimum tax, the United States would collect a tax on
foreign earnings equal to the difference
between a 19 percent rate and 85 percent of the effective rate paid by the company in the
foreign jurisdiction, not to go below zero.
The savvy Chinese
Foreign Family Judgment Enforcement Lawyers at MacLean Family Law also handle multi-million dollar cases where BC courts need to determine whether BC should take
jurisdiction or let some other country's legal system decide family disputes
between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and countries.
[57] The
foreign court will be found to have had
jurisdiction if there is a «real and substantial connection»
between the cause of action and the
foreign court.
There is ``... no condition of exceptionality for the purposes of section 16... mere disparity
between [a
foreign] award and what would be awarded on an English divorce will certainly be insufficient to trigger the application of Part III... nor is hardship and injustice (much less serious injustice) a condition of the exercise of the
jurisdiction, but if either factor is present, it may make it appropriate, in the light of all the circumstances, for an order to be made, and may affect the nature of the provision ordered.
The Court of Cassation is also as - signed the task of establishing
jurisdiction (indicates, when you create a conflict
between the or - dinary courts and the special, Ital - ian or
foreign ones, which has the power to treat the cause) and the competence (to resolve a conflict
between two lower courts).
Conversely, the Court gave a cross-border application to article 14.7 of the Covenant, on the grounds that a separate provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure did not distinguish
between national and
foreign jurisdiction in enforcing double jeopardy.
However, the court would review the following four issues if challenged by the respondent: (1) whether the
foreign court lacks
jurisdiction pursuant to Taiwanese laws; (2) whether a default judgment is rendered against the losing defendant, but the notice or summons of the initiation of action had been legally served in a reasonable time in the
foreign country or had been served through judicial assistance provided under the Taiwanese laws; (3) whether the performance ordered by such judgment or its litigation procedure is against Taiwanese public policy or morals; and (4) whether there exists no mutual recognition
between the
foreign country and Taiwan.
The plaintiff here alleged that the Northern District had original
jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a)(2)-- the diversity of citizenship statute that vests Federal courts with
jurisdiction over claims
between «citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a
foreign state.»
In an action to recognize and enforce a
foreign judgment where the
foreign court validly assumed
jurisdiction, there is no need to prove a real and substantial connection exists
between the enforcing forum and either the judgment debtor or the dispute.
(The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime
Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies
between two or more States;
between a State and Citizens of another State;
between Citizens of different States;
between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and
between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and
foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.)
Written by local experts in key
jurisdictions, topics covered include: regulations governing direct distribution; potential restrictions, financial and tax considerations on
foreign businesses» operations; distribution structures available to suppliers; regulation of relationships
between suppliers and distributors; restrictions on the distribution of competing products; relevant consumer protection laws; restrictions on contractual choice of law, courts or arbitration tribunals; and dispute resolution, mediation and arbitration procedures and processes.
The gray area
between in rem orders that affect title to land and in personam orders that enforce rights with regards to land is often too murky to discern, as outlined above, which brings us to the next option a court has with regards to matrimonial assets located in a
foreign jurisdiction: to defer to the
foreign jurisdiction.
Once in force, such legislation would provide for more cooperation
between tribunals of different
jurisdictions involved in the same insolvency files, by creating concepts such as the center of main interest of a company, and by allowing for the recognition of
foreign proceedings and of a
foreign representative.
The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority; — to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls; — to all cases of admiralty and maritime
jurisdiction; — to controversies to which the United States shall be a party; — to controversies
between two or more states; —
between a state and citizens of another state; —
between citizens of different states; —
between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and
between a state, or the citizens thereof, and
foreign states, citizens or subjects.
In his reasons, Gascon J. maintains a clear distinction
between jurisdiction over hearing a dispute at first instance and
jurisdiction over enforcement of a
foreign judgment.
To enforce a
foreign judgment, all a plaintiff must demonstrate is a real and substantial connection
between the dispute and the
foreign court, such that it could be said that the
foreign court properly assumed
jurisdiction, and that the defendant was served in accordance with the applicable rules (see eg para 27).
«The judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity arising udner... treaties made, or which shall be made... to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and counsels; to admiralty and maritime
jurisdiction,... to controversies
between... a state or citizens thereof and
foreign states, citizens, or subjects.»