Sentences with phrase «between global warming deniers»

Sanders notes, «This isn't the usual debate between global warming deniers and people who want to tax big oil in order to save the planet.

Not exact matches

Consider the oddball doctors who took tobacco money to deny a link between cigarette smoking and cancer, or the handful of scientists who take oil and coal money to discredit global warming science, or the people who have done both.

For years, we at Greenpeace have been working to make public the secret paper trails that show what everyone already knows: climate science deniers - #Fakexperts - are few and far between, and most of them are paid by companies most responsible for global warming to downplay the problem.

Chris Dudley, a Dot Earth commenter, linked this RC article, and pointed out that Andy Revkin has long denied links between extreme weather and global warming.

The figures showing a strong correlation between low cloudiness and GCRs was also the high - point of a television climate - denier polemic shown last night on Channel 4 here in the UK, entitled The Great Global Warming Swindle.

I have no doubt that your blog entry will be followed by the usual responses: those who deny the existence of global warming, those who deny the link between greenhouse gases and global warming, those who insist there still isn't enough evidence, and those who can not see beyond the rising prices of gasoline and heating oil.

He's not just denying global warming, he's denying a link between carbon dioxide and the planet's increasing temperature.

That study refuted gospel by deniers that global warming slowed between 1998 and 2012.

In 1997 he declared that Dr. Bert Bolin, then chairman of the IPCC, had changed his position on climate change and denied a connection between global warming and extreme weather, accusations that Bolin called «inaccurate and misleading.»

Like the tobacco lobbyists who spent years denying the links between smoking and cancer, global warming denialists don't have to win the debate — they simply have to confuse the public indefinitely to successfully undermine any political action which might hit the interests of their backers in the fossil fuel industries

I am a global warming skeptic, not a denier, and part of the difference is that it's not an either / or between no effects from warming and the catastrophic vision of Al Gore.

Dr Schmidt also denied that there was any «pause» or «hiatus» in global warming between the 1998 and 2015 El Ninos.

There is an unholy alliance between government and industry to defer and delay action, to deny the true implications of global warming, and to hoodwink the public into sharing their view that protecting the old energy industries must come first.

The Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund, both based in Virginia, are donor - advised funds that have channeled money from the Kochs, owners of the sprawling conglomerate Koch Industries and outspoken supporters of conservative causes, to groups that deny the link between fossil fuels and global warming, the paper says.

In scientific contexts, the denialist can deny a cause (carbon dioxide does not cause global warming), an effect (the Earth is not warming), the association between the two (CO2 levels are rising and the Earth is warming, but not because of the carbon dioxide), the direction of the cause - and - effect relationship (carbon dioxide concentrations are increasing because the earth is warming) or the identification of the cause - and - effect relationship (other factors than greenhouse gases are causing the Earth to warm).