Not exact matches
You
understand the difference
between historical science and observational science, right?
I
understand the «reformed subjectivist principle» as both naturalizing the human /
historical and humanizing the natural — or perhaps better, as seeking an ontological system midway
between them and able to account for both.
As presented here, the hierarchical scheme shows why «scientific» models of explanation, based on invariant relationships
between abstract properties, have failed to satisfy the
historical understanding.
This is not to say that Bornkamm has moved to the position of «realized eschatology» (91); rather he sees (with Bultmann) the tension
between future and present as inherent in the involvement of the imperative in the indicative, i.e. inherent in the
historical understanding of the self.
On the other hand the scribe who fears the Pharisee does not teach the differences
between heresy and sound Bible doctrine; nor does he teach the
historical views to
understanding the Bible.
The very arrangement of the biblical books in the Hebrew canon of scripture presupposes this definition of prophetism.1
Between the first division of the Law and the third division of the Writings, the central category of the Prophets embraces not only the books of the prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve prophets from Hosea to Malachi (all together termed «Latter Prophets») but also the
historical writings of Joshua, Judges, and the books of Samuel and Kings («Former Prophets») In this way the Hebrew Bible formally and appropriately acknowledges that prophetism is more than the prophet and his work, that it is also a way of looking at,
understanding, and interpreting history.
This means that every preacher has the job of building bridges of
understanding between the
historical meaning of traditional words and the contemporary situation or symbol in which the same meaning is imbedded.
Reumann outlines the
historical hardening of theological categories
between Lutherans and Catholics arising out of the Reformation doctrine of justification by faith, and the convergence toward a common
understanding on justification and related doctrines through Lutheran - Catholic dialogues over the past thirty years.
The distinction
between historical process thinkers and empirical process thinkers is delicate but clear One way to
understand it is to emphasize the similarity
between the empiricism of the empirical process thinkers and the empiricism of most natural scientists.
Rescue workers took comfort in this remnant of the building structure and they prayed to it as a religious object.But there is a difference
between displaying an artifact of
historical significance and saying we want you [the public] to bless it — museum goers
understand that distinction»...
Beyond this simple reinterpretation of the old Covenant and the typological correlation
between the two Testaments, medieval hermeneutics pursued the coincidence
between the
understanding of the faith in the lectio divina and the
understanding of reality as a whole, divine and human,
historical and physical.
These people
understood the importance of Church history as the portion of the
historical - redemptive narrative located
between Redemption and Consummation, not just blank pages
between the end of Revelation and the return of Christ in space and time.
Wright believes a critical realist reading of the text is something of a third way
between two extremes, one that can «take the postmodern critique fully on board and still come back with a strong case for a genuinely
historical understanding.»
Western writing on Eastern religion has had, in the course of the last hundred years, because of its substance, an influence on the development of those religions themselves that certainly deserves careful
historical investigation; on the whole, because of the form in which it has mostly been cast, it has in addition been causing resentment and is beginning to elicit protest.22 Certainly anyone for whom comparative religion studies are something that might or should serve to promote mutual
understanding and good relations
between religious communities can not but be concerned at this contrary effect.
The David - Bathsheba episode provides
historical commentary on the Old Testament
understanding of adultery as disruptive of community
between God and man (II Sam.
Thus, we come to the unbridgeable gap
between the New Testament theologian and the theistic existentialist, and we find that it is an old issue returning in a new form: is the
historical Jesus necessarily anything more than an example we seek to imitate in his worship of the Father (Harnack) or in his breakthrough to true existential self -
understanding (Jaspers)?
The impression one receives is of apot - pourri of contemporaneous and non-contemporaneous sources brought together to support or embellish the point being made, but without the
historical filter necessary to distinguish
between their various degrees of usefulness in
understanding the period on its own terms.
To
understand the «new hermeneutic» it helps to recognize that it grew out of the exploration of the continuity
between the
historical Jesus and the kerygmatic Christ, which, of course, in view of form criticism, is necessarily a question of the continuity
between the message of Jesus, to the limited extent that we know it, and the kerygma proclaiming the Christ.
In other words, they can either compare a
historical case with a present situation by endeavouring to find common features
between the two or learn a
historical process that has led to the present situation so as to
understand it better.
«We're interested in
understanding the
historical relationships
between many different human populations, and the migration patterns that have led to the peopling of the world,» he says.
The aim of the teaching unit was to improve students» insight into epistemological principles regarding history and their
understanding of the difference
between primary sources and
historical accounts.
There's a fine line any performer must tip - toe
between characterization and impersonation when bringing a
historical figure to the screen and Portman
understands the delicate balance better than most.
I found myself smiling throughout, with full
understanding that this satirical look at a meeting
between two famous men with little common ground has no real
historical importance... other than resulting in the all - time most requested photograph from the National Archives.
Over the course of this journey, they become able to: - Recall the main events that occurred
between 1912 and 1945, through an interactive group activity; - Remember some key information about J.B Priestley and his beliefs; - Read and
understand the opening of the play; - Make links
between the opening of the play and the
historical context - both in term of when the play was set, and when it was written; - Analyse how Priestley links
historical context to his characters, in order to get his messages across to the audience; - Peer / self - assess learning attempts.
gain
historical perspective by placing their growing knowledge into different contexts,
understanding the connections
between local, regional, national and international history;
between cultural, economic, military, political, religious and social history; and
between short - and long - term timescales.
It can be enlightening for students to
understand the relationships
between historical and contemporary examples of discrimination.
Great
historical fiction gives the reader deeper
understanding of the times and people depicted; Vanora Bennett allows me to finally comprehend the deep differences
between the French and English explored in both Shakespeare's Henry V and the tragic tale of Saint Joan.
Those wanting a good
historical understanding of the financial facts
between the First and Second World Wars will get it here.
A main feature of the MAM program is to explore the interplay
between historical and contemporary art to enrich our
understanding of the larger
historical context in which art is created, presenting work that is both challenging and accessible.
Apparatus 2.0 expands on its predecessor by initiating long - distance working relationships
between the same artists, asking them to consider their experiences — in different cities, under respective
historical and sociopolitical conditions — and see how these aspects shape their
understanding of images as a form of cultural critique.
This presentation of
historical work — a first at the CAG — is intended to challenge the viewer's
understanding of what a contemporary art space should show, building a bridge
between image making techniques and endeavors of different eras.
New York... Beginning October 23, 2017, Luxembourg & Dayan will celebrate the semi-centennial of the Arte Povera movement with Contingencies: Arte Povera and After, an exhibition placing select works by contemporary artists in dialogue with significant Arte Povera works from the 1960s and 1970s, crossing these
historical moments in order to better
understand the echoes
between them.
Creating a bridge
between Marcel Duchamp's ready - mades and the Pop Art of Andy Warhol, Armleder's work shuffles the cards and brings both
historical precedents to a new level of
understanding.
Reading his PDFs will give you a comprehensive
understanding of the argument for GW, explanation of forcings (particularly CO2, which you asked about) and of the difference
between historical evidence vs computer models.
Assess Climate - Driven Economic Changes: We analyze millions of
historical observations culled from a surge in recent academic research to
understand and quantify the relationship
between a changing climate and social welfare across six principle categories, including: mortality, labor productivity, agriculture, conflict, infrastructure, and energy demand.
Given that «causes of the earlier warming are less clear ``, our
understanding of Earth's climate system is rudimentary at best, and our
historical record is laughably brief, it is confounding how the IPCC can be so «extremely» sure «that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century», which is «not statistically significantly different» from the natural warming that occurred
between 1910 — 1940.
«This is a difference
between understanding that we have a crisis of
historical consequence here,» he said.
Think Progress:
Understanding The
Historical Conflicts Behind Violence In Assam, And How Climate Change Could Make It Worse.Recent violence
between the Bodo tribe and immigrant minorities in the northeastern Indian state of Assam has cost the lives of at least 96 people and caused more than 300,000 residents to flee their homes for refugee camps.
Detecting trends in Atlantic and eastern North Pacific hurricane activity is challenged by a lack of consistent
historical data and limited
understanding of all of the complex interactions
between the atmosphere and ocean that influence hurricanes.4, 5,6
Process - based studies have focused on
understanding the role of the land surface on climate, with research looking into the regional impact of
historical or hypothetical (future scenario) land - use change on climate, as well as
understanding diurnal - scale relationships
between surface fluxes of heat and moisture and subsequent atmospheric processes such as convection and the generation of precipitation.
If you want hiring managers to notice your Healthcare Analyst resume template, then you need to show that you
understand the relationship
between historical data and future trends.
Demonstrate an
understanding of the relationship
between the intergenerational transmission of
historical trauma and sobriety maintenance among urban American Indians / Alaska Natives.