Sentences with phrase «between human minds»

If human beings could communicate among themselves by direct sympathy, then they would be as mutually dependent upon each other as the body and mind are; and this condition would deny individual persons freedom and distinct individuality over against one another.26 Although the relationship between one's body and mind seems to be immediately social, Hartshorne holds that interchange between human minds is almost never by direct contact and generally through mediation of vibrating particles of air and other kinds of «matter.»

Descartes drew the line between human minds which are subjects and the rest of the world made of objects.

Still music psychologist David Greenberg, who led the study, insists the results are a reflection of the incredibly tight link between the human mind and the music it produces.

Not only is the mutable world separated from its divine principle — the One — by intervals of emanation that descend in ever greater alienation from their source, but because the highest truth is the secret identity between the human mind and the One, the labor of philosophy is one of escape: all multiplicity, change, particularity, every feature of the living world, is not only accidental to this formless identity, but a kind of falsehood, and to recover the truth that dwells within, one must detach oneself from what lies without, including the sundry incidentals of one's individual existence; truth is oblivion of the flesh, a pure nothingness, to attain which one must sacrifice the world.

In any case, it will be evident by now that the relationship between God and the created order is much more like that between the human mind and the human body, as we commonly conceive it, than it is like that between an earthly ruler and his subjects.

The rift between the human mind and a lifeless, inert cosmos is thus widened, contributing to the modern experience of meaninglessness.

Not exact matches

Why must a false dichotomy between mind and heart substitute for a fuller comprehension of the human soul and the poetry that expresses it?

They are found to be a very Rich & Powerful Groups and Mother of Groups that control lives of Millions... Now Finding Peace means that we should think on how to get those Master Keys or Super Master Keys of Super Powerful Groups that are to be gathered all in one Ring lock that works to getting them to work towards One Purpose only and that is on how to make Human Life better Globally and that by investing in them human populations worldwide not minding their Race or Faith or Political interests such will work towards Building Bridges between all Nations holding and calling one Message of Love and Sharing in some form of Brotherhood that works towards a Greener Planet EaHuman Life better Globally and that by investing in them human populations worldwide not minding their Race or Faith or Political interests such will work towards Building Bridges between all Nations holding and calling one Message of Love and Sharing in some form of Brotherhood that works towards a Greener Planet Eahuman populations worldwide not minding their Race or Faith or Political interests such will work towards Building Bridges between all Nations holding and calling one Message of Love and Sharing in some form of Brotherhood that works towards a Greener Planet Earth!?

The natural world is nothing less than a mediation between minds: the unlimited mind of the Creator and our limited human minds.

We can see there is a coherence between the idea that the religiosity of mankind is a function of our mental architecture, and the idea that the human mind with its spiritual soul is made for union with God in the first place.

For while we are thus speaking foolishly of human relationships, we may suppose a difference of mind between them such as to render an understanding impossible.

He sided with Gordon Clark and Carl Henry that the laws of logic were both in the mind of God and in human minds and thus there was a correspondence between both.

The great division in these scriptures is not between mind and matter or human beings and all other entities.

Here, for example, Novak reformulates his arguments about the necessary relationship between democracy and capitalism (and vice versa), as well as his location of the cause of the wealth of nations in the creative, inventive, and entrepreneurial spirit of the human mind.

This is because of the obvious differences between the two states and the assumed effects such differences had on the average human mind.

You charge me also with saying, again pleading the support of the scriptures, that though we humans have many kindly affections, love of children, love between men and women, love of country, all these too are corrupted and defiled; and that though we have very agile minds, able to penetrate into the mysteries of nature, we put this gift and attainment to ignoble uses.»

I simply offered a healthy debate between two open minded human beings, but I must have been mistaken.

The first is human dignity, which is characteristic of our status in between God and beasts: «Not simply body, but also not simply mind or spirit; rather, the place where body and spirit meet and are united (and reconciled?)

The only difference between each form is structure, but my feeble human mind believes there is more to me..

He provides the balanced picture again between knower and known, without an a priori, in going on to say: «The key to development is a mind capable of thinking in technological terms and grasping the fully human meaning of human activities, within the context of the holistic meaning of the individual's being.»

Here is the fundamental difference between the Word of God and the human word: God's Word is not just a sound which flies away and disappears, a meaning grasped one instant by the listener's mind only to fall into oblivion afterward.

Immediate Intuition in Caritasin Veritate For Edward Holloway every human observation inherently involves a complementary interaction and interdefinition between «me and my environment», a fundamental aspect of which is the relationship between the knowing spiritual mind and ordered matter.

The philosopher Leo Strauss said that the world — meaning cosmos or nature — is the home of the human mind, but even real guy philosophers (and in the classical world there was no difference between philosophers and scientists) are more than minds.

He made absolute by a decree that has lasted to our own day the divorce between study of the world outside of us and study of the human mind as an instrument.

Perls rejected the split in much philosophy, psychology, and psychotherapy between the mind and the body, the human organism and the wider interpersonal environment.

The link between justice and ecological issues becomes especially evident in light of the dualistic, hierarchical mode of Western thought in which a superior and an inferior are correlated: male - female, white people — people of color, heterosexual - homosexual, able - bodied — physically challenged, culture - nature, mind - body, human - nonhuman.

How else explain the affinity between the cognitive qualities of the human mind and the laws by which the universe moves?

At the core of the environmental crisis is a great divide between mind and body, between head and heart, between human and nature.

The constitution of a society prescribes the forms of justice only when it provides for that kind of interaction among individuals, and between individuals and the physical environment, which creates the human mind, and which sustains that scope of understanding, power of action and richness of appreciation which is distinctively human in contrast to the lower animals.

This means that all phenomena are identical in their constituent self - identity; all are in a state of constant transformation; and there are no absolute differences between human nature and the natural order, body and mind, male and female, enlightenment and ignorance.

Yet, given God's love of creation, there is an analogy between human knowing and God's knowing: despite all differences between infinite and finite, men can approximate God's mind and know something of God and creatures.

Likewise, he can talk about causal interaction between the central series of experiences in the human being (the mind, or psyche) and the bodily cells.

In the loose interface between physical data and vivid personal experience — that «space» identified as mind (Gordon Rattrey Taylor, The Natural History of the Mind [Dutton, 19791)-- we find clues to the human meaning of human presemind (Gordon Rattrey Taylor, The Natural History of the Mind [Dutton, 19791)-- we find clues to the human meaning of human preseMind [Dutton, 19791)-- we find clues to the human meaning of human presence.

For the latter a fundamental dualism of human and divine mind with mutual interaction but not inclusion characterizes the unity between them.

That human, beings can not thrive as happy animals, but are both plagued and blessed with a self - reflexive mind, points to God's existence: Someone has set us on this perilous tightwire stretched between finitude and infinity.

He also grants the common - sense view that a human corpse is a dead thing as a human body, but he still makes his panpsychistic point by insisting that even a corpse is composed of many living things and, as far as our knowledge runs, nothing else.29 In addition, he claims that his belief that there is only a relative and not an absolute distinction between mind and matter is given support by recent developments in physics that have shown that the differences between matter and various kinds of radiation are differences of degree and not of kind.

This basic duality is intimate and basic to human self - consciousness: that is the distinction between matter and mind, between deterministic things with limited life cycles and goals, and my ability to manipulate these things beyond these limitations for my own goals.

So there is a gap between human choice and divine foreknowledge, a gap that transcends understanding and that helps define God in my mind.

It's often earlier for women and later for men, but somewhere between the ages of 20 and 32, the human animal loses its mind.

It is an opportunity to address some of the false assumptions in the minds of many of our people and to bring out the profound harmony between Catholic truth and true human compassion, which is the purpose of this column.This is really an opportunity to take our people deeper into the life and work of the crucified Christ.

(p. 27 and cf. p67) It is not clear whether, in the dialectic between subject and «community with ecclesial character», when say papal teaching does not «speak to me», there is a place for Vatican II's call for the human subject to offer a «religious assent... of mind and will... according to (the Pope's) manifest mind and will» (Lumen Gentium, 25).

What is your favourite book?It's hard to choose just one - and it depends on my state of mind at the time of asking - but it may be a choice between Toni Morrison's Paradise, a book which digs deep into the human condition, and Birdsong by Sebastian Faulks.

The same could also be said for the performance of the human mind, using the reasonable assumption that our brains are more or less constant between individuals and that it is our innovation and experience that count.

Mnemonics rely not only on repetition to remember facts, but also on associations between easy - to - remember information and to be remembered lists of data, based on the principle that the human mind much more easily remembers data attached to spatial, personal, or otherwise meaningful information than that occurring in meaningless sequences.

But he has also said he has an open mind and sees «some connectivity» between human activity and and global warming.

Harvard's Steven Pinker, the celebrated author of The Blank Slate and an expert on the evolution of language and the mind, addressed that point in an interview in New Scientist magazine: «People, including me, would rather believe that significant human biological evolution stopped between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago, before the races diverged, which would ensure that racial and ethnic groups are biologically equivalent.»

Still, fully understanding the genetic differences between humans and chimps will require actually getting inside the chimpanzee's mind.

Whereas ejaculation is a somatic phenomenon, orgasm (as Shakespeare implies) is a phenomenon of the spirit, and even in human males a strict correlation between mind and matter hasn't been established.

If brain size had anything to do with innovation and creativity, some scientists expected to see a link between the so - called Mind's Big Bang (the emergence of bone tools and cave paintings that occurred between 50,000 and 70,000 years ago) and the emergence of modern - size human brains.

Before you get alarmed, keep in mind that this was a small study, and it's the first to suggest an association between PFRs and infertility in humans.