Only a healthy pluralism in philosophy and rhetorical forms can free theology to do the work of locating the correspondence
between human word and divine truth.
Not exact matches
To those impatient political enthusiasts who talk loudly on how futile and impractical religion must always be, and who are bent on legislating
human equality into existence, Kierkegaard offers a
word of counsel, «Only that which is religious can with the assistance of eternity press the equality of men through to its ultimate conclusions: the reverent, genuine, unworldly, true, the only possible equality
between men.
It is only because God utterly transcends history that his free decision to become a
human being in time is also a decision of grace: «Far from implying a distance
between the
Word and the world, the
Word's distinct manner of transcending the world implies a distinct manner of intimacy with the world.»
To fulfill this mission it was necessary that God the
word should become perfect
human being in possessing a rational soul capable of exercising a real choice
between good and evil and entering into conflict with the passions of the
human soul.
But the
word can be spoken and heard in the authentic experience of reconciliation, and it stands in the language of the Gospel as the Word of God clothing itself in human speech and opening the way for the language of redemption to be spoken between God and
word can be spoken and heard in the authentic experience of reconciliation, and it stands in the language of the Gospel as the
Word of God clothing itself in human speech and opening the way for the language of redemption to be spoken between God and
Word of God clothing itself in
human speech and opening the way for the language of redemption to be spoken
between God and man.
In other
words, the sacrifice that saves the world is first of all a kind of commerce
between the
human and the divine, something the Hindu understands as well as the Christian.
This is a result of
human speech's relationship with the
Word of God: of God's taking up this human word, so that there is continuity (as well as discontinuity) between them, and of human speech's finality in relationship with the Word of
Word of God: of God's taking up this
human word, so that there is continuity (as well as discontinuity) between them, and of human speech's finality in relationship with the Word of
word, so that there is continuity (as well as discontinuity)
between them, and of
human speech's finality in relationship with the
Word of
Word of God.
This relationship becomes luminous and unquestionable only when the
word is spoken by a witness — that is, by one who explicitly makes the connection
between the divine and the
human word.
Highly significant for Christology are these two quotations from Hartshorne's The Divine Relativity10 In the first he refuses to allow «paradox» to cover up illogicality: «A theological paradox, it appears, is what a contradiction becomes when it is about God rather than something else...» In the second he applies this to the relation
between God's power and our
human decisions: «For God to do what I do when I decide my own act, determine my own concrete being, is mere nonsense,
words without meaning.
Here is the fundamental difference
between the
Word of God and the human word: God's Word is not just a sound which flies away and disappears, a meaning grasped one instant by the listener's mind only to fall into oblivion afterw
Word of God and the
human word: God's Word is not just a sound which flies away and disappears, a meaning grasped one instant by the listener's mind only to fall into oblivion afterw
word: God's
Word is not just a sound which flies away and disappears, a meaning grasped one instant by the listener's mind only to fall into oblivion afterw
Word is not just a sound which flies away and disappears, a meaning grasped one instant by the listener's mind only to fall into oblivion afterward.
Male - marked
words, which slip back and forth
between designating only males and designating all
human beings; have never given an adequate reflection of social reality.
There are many discrepancies
between words and acts in Christianity (look at some of the fundamentalist Republicans for example) just as there are in other religions because in spite of having the Creator within us, we are all still
human.
48 The Arabic
word Sakhkhara is used in the Qur» an to define the relationship
between human and non -
human.49 Sakhkhara means to constrain or compel a servant or a beast to do what it does not desire.
But they also believed there was a huge gap — an «infinite qualitative distinction» in the
words of theologian Karl Barth —
between sinful
humans and the omniscient God.
Our proposal also entails a distinction
between the Christ, that
Word or creative possibility specifically addressed to the
human situation and actualizable by a man, and the Logos, which is the totality of creative possibilities inherent in the primordial or nontemporal nature of God, actualizable by the diverse creatures appropriate to them, including intelligent living beings on other worlds.
The supreme expression of this personal nature of God's communication is in the person, Jesus of Nazareth, the «
Word made flesh» (John 1:14), whose nature was to liberate
humans to their full humanity (Luke 4, etc) and to restore intimate relationship (communion)
between creation and God (II Cor 5:18 - 21).
That which we call the Incarnation is not a new event by which a new relationship is established
between the
Word of God and
human nature.
For it denies that there is any analogy
between divine and
human goodness themselves; it asserts only that divine goodness is to God's nature as
human goodness is to man's nature — in other
words, that each is good in away appropriate to its own nature.
Well, there's a huge difference
between a «puppet» and a «fan», you can always look up the definition of both
words; one isn't
human (inanimate) and is animated or controlled by someone else, the other is
human — a living being with a will.
much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship
between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a
word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships
between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just
human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..
Humans appear to identify voices by making comparisons
between talkers» pronunciations of
words and listeners» stored abstract representations of the sounds in those
words.
Humans seem to distinguish
between having sex and creating a pair - bond, although for each we use the
word mate
In other
words, if the dog is well - behaved and likes to socialize with
humans, then the bond
between the dog and its owner is greater.
«
Humans organize their knowledge of social relationships into a hierarchical structure, and they also make use of hierarchical structures when deducing relationships
between words in language,» notes study co-author Robert Seyfarth.
Crosswords can reflect the nature of intuition, hint at the way we retrieve
words from our memory, and reveal a surprising connection
between puzzle solving and our ability to recognise a
human face.
It is often said that dogs can «smell fear,» but the majority of research into communication
between dogs and
humans has focused on gestures,
words, and facial expressions.
In other
words, lack of a common biology would impede the deepest of relationships
between humans and machines.
Witness the mass production of content farms — purveying tips on the best way to wear sweater vests along with reviews of deodorant containers — a flood of inanely irrelevant
human - penned
word dumps that blur the indistinct borderline
between spam and actual content.
There's more action this time around, as Bella gets involved in an eternal
human - vampire - werewolf romantic triangle, but many of the heart - to - hearts
between Bella and her beaux seem to go on for ever, all trembling lips and frowny foreheads and barely articulate groping for
words.
The Download (comprising 4 files, within one zip file) includes: - A PPT Containing a Full Lesson - A complete lesson plan covering: objectives, key -
words, differentiation, and lesson timeline - Double - sided A4 worksheet - A3 Silent Debate group worksheets - A Homework Task The topic of the lesson focusses on the following part of the specification:
Human Concerns [Duties / Virtues / Yamas] • Hindu understanding of the concepts of free will, suffering and virtue, including their relationship to karma and samsara • The meaning and importance of Hindu virtues / moral duties (yamas), including harmlessness / non-violence (Ahimsa), compassion (daya), selfcontrol / restraint (dama) and giving (dana) • The relationship between virtues and particular elements of dharma • Common and divergent emphases placed on human concerns by different Hindu groups, including which virtues are identified as of core importance • Different interpretations and emphases given to sources of wisdom and authority by different Hindu groups Sources: Mahabharata V 39 Bhagavad Gita XVI, 1 — 3 Bhagavad Gita VIII 8 — 12 This is part of a series of lessons, if you like it: save countless hours by downloading the complete co
Human Concerns [Duties / Virtues / Yamas] • Hindu understanding of the concepts of free will, suffering and virtue, including their relationship to karma and samsara • The meaning and importance of Hindu virtues / moral duties (yamas), including harmlessness / non-violence (Ahimsa), compassion (daya), selfcontrol / restraint (dama) and giving (dana) • The relationship
between virtues and particular elements of dharma • Common and divergent emphases placed on
human concerns by different Hindu groups, including which virtues are identified as of core importance • Different interpretations and emphases given to sources of wisdom and authority by different Hindu groups Sources: Mahabharata V 39 Bhagavad Gita XVI, 1 — 3 Bhagavad Gita VIII 8 — 12 This is part of a series of lessons, if you like it: save countless hours by downloading the complete co
human concerns by different Hindu groups, including which virtues are identified as of core importance • Different interpretations and emphases given to sources of wisdom and authority by different Hindu groups Sources: Mahabharata V 39 Bhagavad Gita XVI, 1 — 3 Bhagavad Gita VIII 8 — 12 This is part of a series of lessons, if you like it: save countless hours by downloading the complete course!
The consensus appears to be that these higher levels of performance have less to do with policy than with everything else: the «ecosystem» of reform in a given place (usually a city) and its network of «
human - capital providers,» expert charter - management organizations, leadership - development programs, school - incubator efforts, local funders and civic leaders, etc. — in other
words, what conservatives like to call «civil society»: the space
between the government and the individual (in this case,
between government and individual schools).
For 35 years teachers, students and parents have been stuck in the middle of the war of
words between psychologists regarding the nature of
human intelligence.
The geographical area that today is Iraq is regarded by historians as the site of some of the earliest
human civilizations, including the Sumerians (who lived
between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in Mesopotamia, a Greek
word meaning land
between the two rivers).
Bark & Co. has finally tapped the
humans at BarkPost to put into
words and photographs, the first official BarkBook, capturing the depth, spirit, and power of the extraordinary bond
between humans and their pups.
Scientists believe that the ability to use our brain to differentiate
between words and intonation was a huge step in the
human evolution and development of speech.
Overall, the results of this study suggest that naturalistic DDS, comprising of both dog - directed prosody and dog - relevant content
words, improves dogs» attention and may strengthen the affiliative bond
between humans and their pets.
In the artist's own
words, «their relation to the natural world suggests a link
between man and nature, implying the sculptures are found objects in a
human forest.»
What is a
word for collaboration
between material will and
human intention that implies generation rather than decay?
As the gallery notes, «These are the
words of the artist whose artistic process seems to reflect the ever fluid identity of the contemporary
human being that constantly oscillates
between the virtual and the real.»
Monkeys» vocal equipment can produce the sounds of
human speech, research shows, but they lack the connections
between the auditory and motor parts of the brain that
humans rely on to imitate
words.
Inszenierung / Mise en scene», Museum im Kulturspeicher, Würzburg 2008 «Bending the
Word / MATRIX 226», BAM / PFA — UC Berkeley Art Museum, Berkeley 2008 «Time Crevasse», Yokohama Triennial 2008, Yokohama 2008 «ICA: 60 Past, Present and Future», performance at ICA — Institute of Contemporary Arts, London 2008 «Fia Backstrom: That social space
between speaking and meaning», White Columns, New York (performance) 2008 «The Store», Tulips & Roses, Vilnius 2008 «Experiment Marathon Reykjavik», Reykjavik Art Museum, Reykjavik 2008 «Oral Culture», performance at Jan Mot, Brussels (performance) 2008 «Tate Triennial 2009 Prologue 1», Tate Britain, London (performance) 2008 «Self - Storage», CCA — California College of the Arts, Metro Self Storage, San Francisco 2008 «Of this Tale, I can not Guarantee A Single
Word», Royal College of Art, London 2008 «5th Berlin Biennial», KW Institute for Contemporary Art, Berlin 2007 «Monumental Detours / Insignificant Fixtures», performance at KW Institute for Contemporary Art, Berlin (performance) 2007 «Performa 07», The second Visual Art Performance Biennial, New York (performance) 2007 «Playground», Stuk Performance Festival, Leuven 2007 «The Year of the
Human Sciences», performance at Hebbel am Ufer (HAU), Berlin (performance) 2007 «Experiment Marathon», Serpentine Gallery, London (performance) 2007 «Floating Territories», Evens Foundation, Transbiennial Project, Istanbul and Athens (performance) 2007 «The Present Order», Museum de Hallen, Haarlem 2007 «The Moment You Realise You Are Lost», Johann Konig, Berlin 2007 «Köln Show2», European Kunsthalle, Cologne
Titled «Alloy Alloy» — here doubled, the
word means a mixture of metals, or a metal made by bonding metal with another element, in the scientific jargon — the exhibition creates similarly unexpected fusions
between humans, materials and architecture.
The symbolic battle
between word and image is a metaphoric representation of the contained malleability of
human expression.
Inszenierung / Mise en scene», Museum im Kulturspeicher, Würzburg 2008 «Bending the
Word / MATRIX 226», BAM / PFA — UC Berkeley Art Museum, Berkeley 2008 «Time Crevasse», Yokohama Triennial 2008, Yokohama 2008 «ICA: 60 Past, Present and Future», performance at ICA — Institute of Contemporary Arts, Londra 2008 «Fia Backstrom: That social space
between speaking and meaning», White Columns, New York (performance) 2008 «The Store», Tulips & Roses, Vilnius 2008 «Experiment Marathon Reykjavik», Reykjavik Art Museum, Reykjavik 2008 «Oral Culture», performance at Jan Mot, Brussels (performance) 2008 «Tate Triennial 2009 Prologue 1», Tate Britain, Londra (performance) 2008 «Self - Storage», CCA — California College of the Arts, Metro Self Storage, San Francisco 2008 «Of this Tale, I can not Guarantee A Single
Word», Royal College of Art, Londra 2008 «5th Berlin Biennial», KW Institute for Contemporary Art, Berlino 2007 «Monumental Detours / Insignificant Fixtures», performance at KW Institute for Contemporary Art, Berlino (performance) 2007 «Performa 07», The second Visual Art Performance Biennial, New York (performance) 2007 «Playground», Stuk Performance Festival, Leuven 2007 «The Year of the
Human Sciences», performance at Hebbel am Ufer (HAU), Berlino (performance) 2007 «Experiment Marathon», Serpentine Gallery, Londra (performance) 2007 «Floating Territories», Evens Foundation, Transbiennial Project, Istanbul ed Atene (performance) 2007 «The Present Order», Museum de Hallen, Haarlem 2007 «The Moment You Realise You Are Lost», Johann Konig, Berlino 2007 «Köln Show2», European Kunsthalle, Colonia
(BARCELONA)(Brief article) Artforum International; January 1, 2011; Demos, T. J.; 310
words... theorists Kodwo Eshun and Anjalika Sagar, the Otolith Group (a 2010 Turner Prize nominee) examines the nature of
human memory and perception...
between contemporary political practice and aesthetic form.
For «Projects 104», he explores the distinction
between the
human characteristics of anger and bitterness, probing this topic through songwriting, theater, and spoken
word poetry.
There's something a bit ironic about the fact that the most fundamental common ground
between every
human being on the planet is, well, the planet we share — yet every language has a different
word for it.
I don't think that
humans are very capable of distinguishing
between accurately expressing their views in 50
words and trying to make the world a better place.
Last year, a war of
words broke out
between Musk and Zuckerberg over whether robots will become smart enough to kill their
human creators.
In their
words, «Our results support the
human - centred view of the firm as we find a significant positive relationship
between employee satisfaction and firm profitability.»