Sentences with phrase «between knowledge of the truth»

Not exact matches

• the capacity to reach objective and universal truth as well as valid metaphysical knowledge; • the unity of body and soul in man; • the dignity of the human person; • relations between nature and freedom; • the importance of natural law and of the «sources of morality,»... • and the necessary conformity of civil law to moral law.

We are certain that there can be no conflict between true science and true theology since God is the source of all truth; conflicts only arise from discrepancies in human knowledge, understanding, and interpretation.»

After a sketch of the standoff between views of theology as something «objective» and views of it as something «subjective,» Wood concurs with Farley's reasons for rejecting the picture of theology as universally valid «objective» truths and factual knowledge.2 He also rejects another type of «objective» view of theology, represented by Hough and Cobb, which defines theology by reference to the purposes of professional church leadership (93).

The distinction between symbolic and literal truth and knowledge is a main theme of Santayana's; he holds that most of our knowledge is of the former kind but that, in recognizing this, we should never forget that there must be a literal truth thus symbolized.

The Catholic writer understands the necessary relationship between truth and beauty, which is not mere social convention or cultural accident but an essential form of human knowledge — intuitive, holistic, and experiential.

«The function of the findings of sociology of knowledge lies somewhere in a fashion hitherto not clearly understood, between irrelevance to the establishment of truth on the one hand, and entire adequacy for determining truth on the other.

I keep hoping religious opposers would gain the common sense to distinguish between truth and lies instead of contributing to the spread of lies by publicizing their ignorance and lack of real bible knowledge all over the place, but I'll always be disappointed.

The knowledge or truth claims that have been constituted are valid for that moment in time (42) but will eventually be superseded by the generation of a new subjectivity produced by another interaction between the text and the interpreter.

The first lecture calls for a balance between liberal critiques of received tradition and neo-orthodox recoveries, as well as a balance between the pragmatic tendency to locate the truth of theology in its consequences and the objectivist insistence that theology simply conveys knowledge of God.

There are, in the history of philosophy, continually renewed controversies between those who, where the theory of knowledge is concerned, are commonly called realists, and those who are sometimes called idealists, but also constructivists, between those for whom truth resides in the end in correspondence between proposition and fact, and those for whom it is something brought into being by more or less autonomous understanding.

You guys really have a hard time with the difference between belief and knowledge, and what the definition of truth is.

Newbigin is absolutely right that Christianity, or at any rate Christian mission and apologetics, is always involved in a pluralist tension — the tension between confidence in God and uncertainty about living out that truth in the world, between faith as God's gift and understanding as a form of growing discovery, between knowing who God is and seeking to bring that knowledge into situations of despair or resistance, not to say anything about the diversity and conflict of views among self - avowed Christians.

Consequently, every study that aims to deepen the knowledge of the truths discovered by reason is vitally important, in the certainty that there is no «competition of any kind between reason and faith» («Fides et Ratio,» No. 17).

Give it a rest, because even a bully in a school yard would know that out of nothing nothing happens, but of course it would take the nerd to conceive what the bully would not get even perhaps at a ripe old age, that what was always before the something which lead to the «thing» on the bully's hand was the Infinite and that what's on the bully's hand can be infinitely divided, or that between the bully's pinky and thumb exists an infinity in itself, as is between the number 1 and another number 1 (one unit and another unit), which make 2, or that the bully's hand will at one infinitely minute point in time disolve into the INFINITE, give it a rest Tom, Tom with the spelling, since you can not comprehend what lays between the fine letters, let alone conceive the truth, and distill knowledge from the ore your inadequate imagination fails to mine.

Until someone with proper expertise in myriad areas of sports science, football coaching, business, finance, law, PR, media, marketing, human resources etc etc has unfettered access to all board meeting minutes, records of all discussions with players, full player medical records, details of all contacts with agents, other clubs, other players, seen copies of player contracts and negotiations, understands the financial imperatives, interprets the business accounting, has reviewed the business plan, has knowledge of the employer / employee contractual relationship between Wenger and the club, has intimate insight in to the goals and objectives of the business and the club — then everyone is filling in the gaps with their own version of events and will necessarily always be a long, long way from anything close to any «truth».

This truth is intimated throughout The Wind Rises in the tension between the desire of several of the characters to simply build graceful, well - designed aircraft and the knowledge that their beautiful creations will be used to perpetrate the hideous horrors of war.»

Meeting through extraordinary circumstances, Noone develops a remarkable friendship with Pete, a connection that evolves into a profound mystery that will blur the lines between truth and illusion, and lead Noone to confront all of his relationships — familial, romantic, and erotic — knowledge that will alter his perception of himself and his life forever.

In this regard, the exhibition tries to show how «truth» can be constructed, often between various forms of knowledge... Cartography of Control, thus, addresses notions such as conflict, man made structures, control, rationality / irrationality... This is shown in work such as Cartography of Control, where the manipulation of powerful electric charge embodies itself as a note on trying to control the uncontrollable.

Interviews, documents, or historical events are points of departure for experimental narratives and documentaries that play with fraught truth, as she investigates the space between presence and absence, memory and erasure in personal knowledge of historical narrative.

So high in fact that by bringing in the Aristotlean distinction between actuality and potentiality it is possible to define truth, justification and belief — the elements in terms of which Plato defined knowledge.