Sentences with phrase «between observation results»

This research has proven for the first time that the deepest part of the lunar mantle is soft, based upon the agreement between observation results and the theoretical calculations.

Not exact matches

Since the causal concept above explicated says nothing about the extent of the time difference between condition and its most immediate results, it is not clear how such observations or any others could show the invalidity of the concept.

Then, they measured the distance between the footprints and used an equation based on observations of living, walking bipeds to estimate the dinosaur's walking speed, yielding a result between 4.5 and 8 kilometers per hour (2.8 to 5 miles per hour), they report online this month and in a forthcoming print issue of Cretaceous Research.

Although it was unknown what is responsible for the maser source in this object, the observation results this time suggests that the maser source is excited by the shock influence between a high - velocity outflow and the ambient gas.

The results could help close a big gap between theory and observation.

Observations and results Could you see the spaces between the rocks in the cups?

The result of a binational collaboration between the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Mexico's National Institute of Astrophysics, Optics, and Electronics (INAOE), the LMT saw first light in 2011 and is about to begin its first scientific observation season.

The results may help to explain discrepancies between observations and theories about how volatile organic compounds produced by vegetation are converted into atmospheric aerosol — especially over forested regions.

Therefore, this result provides converging evidence to support the previous observation of the association between the belief in free will measured by the FAD - Plus and SWB (Stillman et al., 2010; Bergner and Ramon, 2013; Crescioni et al., 2016).

«However, even in very high resolution models, there can be large differences between model results and observations,» said Ma.

It does in fact explain the contradictory results between laboratory and field observations that have been published in the past.»

Depending on the time of the observation correction approach chosen, the resulting temperature trends between 1979 and 2016 ranged from as low as 0.13 C per decade to as high as 0.22 C per decade.

Professor of Economics and Research Chair in Energy, Ecology and Prosperity at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy Dr. Ross McKitrick discusses the wide disparities between the expected results of climate models and real - life observations, during an in - depth interview for The New Criterion by Ben Weingarten

«The level of agreement between the observations and the computational chemistry results was remarkably high,» said Raugei.

One of the early results of this study was the observation of a correlation between high cholesterol and heart disease.

Similar results have been observed in other muscle groups, which have confirmed the association between acute observations of signal intensity (Mendiguchia et al. 2013b) with long - term hypertrophic effects (Wakahara et al. 2013; Bloomquist et al. 2014).

Try this thought experiment with another observed practice to illustrate my point about how the results are being mis - reported... The correlation between student observations that «My teacher seems to know if something is bothering me» and value added was.153, which was less than the.195 correlation for «We spend a lot of time in this class practicing for [the state test].»

As a result, we tested the relationship between classroom observations and a teacher's average student - achievement gains.

Cincinnati provided us with records of each classroom observation conducted between the 2000 — 01 and 2008 — 09 school years, including the scores that evaluators assigned for each specific practice element as a result of that observation.

Average Year 9 reading results for schools in three ICSEA groups (2009 to 2013) Of particular concern is the observation that, since 2000, between - school differences in student performance in PISA have been increasing.

In a regression to predict student test score gains using out of sample test score gains for the same teacher, student survey results, and classroom observations, there is virtually no relationship between test score gains and either classroom observations or student survey results.

The authors add that] to ensure that evaluation ratings better reflect teacher performance, states should [more specifically] track the results of each evaluation measure to pinpoint where misalignment between components, such as between student learning and observation measures, exists.

Schulte cited research that found alignment between the results of those who pass the PACT and the observations of educators supervising those candidates in the field.

Our results thus provided suggestive evidence that the strength of the relationship between teachers» classroom observation scores and their students» test performance may in part be attributable to the sensitivity of the skills assessed during observation to those assessed on the test.

Furthermore, the results suggested a one - to - one correspondence in trends between simulations and observations, but the analysis also gave a regression coefficient of 2 - 4 for natural forcings.

Systematic differences between results from RCMs and observations may not necessarily be less than those for GCMs, however.

However, we have addressed the criticisms and have shown that the results remain — especially the profound disconnect between models and observations.

In January 2008, I discussed here and here how Hansen's projections compared against the most recent RSS and MSU data, noting a downtick which resulted in a spread not merely between observations and Scenario A, but between observations and Scenario B, sometimes said to have been vindicated.

It is important to note the difference in results between the first phase of this analysis and the updated version using observations.

Possible explanations for these results include the neglect of negative forcings in many of the CMIP - 3 simulations of forced climate change), omission of recent temporal changes in solar and volcanic forcing [Wigley, 2010; Kaufmann et al., 2011; Vernier et al., 2011; Solomon et al., 2011], forcing discontinuities at the «splice points» between CMIP - 3 simulations of 20th and 21st century climate change [Arblaster et al., 2011], model response errors, residual observational errors [Mears et al., 2011b], and an unusual manifestation of natural internal variability in the observations (see Figure 7A).

The IPCC report acknowledges the scientific debate that continues over the issue of climate sensitivity and the different results between models and analysis based on observations.

In fact, the gap between model results based on increasing CO2 and the atmospheric observations is continuing to grow.

We posit that these characteristics are the result of demonstrable differences between corresponding topographical datasets used in the gridded observations and CRCM, the resulting errors propagated to physical variables tied to elevation and the beneficial effect of subsequent spatial averaging.

The GCM results successfully produced a pattern of SLAT increase comparable to observations (Fig. 5b), imply - ing a causal relationship between the observed cloud - SLAT changes.

This inconsistency between model results and observations could arise either becaise «real world» amplification effects on short and long term time scales are controlled by different physical mechanisms, and models fail to capture such behavior, or because non-climatic influences remaining in some or all of the observed tropospheric datasets lead to biased long - term trends, or a combination of these factors.

By throttling the exchange between the compartments you can get any result you wish; the above mentioned paper by Levy et al. 2013 show that the deep oceanic up - and down - welling may have been underestimated in so - called «models» by a factor four or five versus observations.

Spencer & Braswell (2008) found: «we obtain positive cloud feedback biases in the range -0.3 to -0.8 Wm ^ -2 K ^ -1... our results suggest the possibility of an even larger discrepancy between models and observations than is currently realized» See Spencer's discussion on Foster's comments «As can be seen, most models exhibit large biases — as much as 50 deg.

Nor do you mention the substantial disagreement between the raters, or the fact that the disagreed upon observations were still included in the results.

The close match between observation and simulation lead the paper's authors to conclude «Our results provide direct experimental evidence for a significant increase in the Earth's greenhouse effect that is consistent with concerns over radiative forcing of climate».

Overall, these results suggest that the «models are statistically indistinguishable from the truth» paradigm, which was used in the main text, is more appropriate to ensure consistency between models and observations, and avoids over emphasizing the climate models outputs.

Between 1960 and today, the majority of stations switched from a late afternoon to an early morning observation time, resulting a systemic change (and resulting bias) in temperature observations.

A secondary result is that caution is required when trying to draw conclusions about any differences between the models and the observations, whether it be to identify internal cycles of the climate system or problems in the models, because the differences that we do see are mostly within the range of uncertainty of the observations.

The mismatch between model results and observations is a topic of research, and a basis for investigations to find the processes that must be added to the models to align them with what is observed.

The statistical problem of continually fine tuning parameters based on observations — which results in a picture of the world but not a model that actually captures the forces and relationships between forces that are involved — there is this supporting observation by Christy:

These authors conclude «While satellite MSU / AMSU observations generally support GCM results with tropical deep ‐ layer tropospheric warming faster than surface, it is evident that the AR4 GCMs exaggerate the increase in static stability between tropical middle and upper troposphere during the last three decades.»

The divergence between tree rings and observations after 1960 demonstrates that tree rings are not reliable air temperature proxies, and this should have stopped publication of the MBH results.

The current cooperation pursuant to the Council Framework Decision 13th June 2002, following my observations as a practitioner in both jurisdictions, drew my attention to the necessity for a mutual cooperation, not only between the Member States» authorities, but inter alia, the lawyers from both countries as the ways of defending the requested persons are completely different; this will see the result meeting at one point, namely the successful defence.

Though I'm surely just flogging a dead horse with this trite observation that social media is everywhere, «Twitter» as a keyword occurred 70 times between June 2007 and January 2014 in Quicklaw results, but in the last 13 months alone it occurred in 40 cases.

Results: Mothers with depressive symptoms were poorer, were less educated and rated lower infant bonding than mothers without depressive symptoms (p = 0.03), yet objective observation revealed no difference between the two groups regarding maternal interactive behavior (p = 0.57).

In addition, a number of studies have shown adequate correlation between the results from parent reports and independent observations.16