People need to understand the differences
between phrases like «join for free» or «sign up for free» and «free to use».
Not exact matches
Such familiarity in no way gives an interpretive leg up, but reading this comparison
between Cioran and La Rochefoucauld» and the
phrase about the former being the latter's great forger is truly brilliant» I kept thinking about what Cioran was
like.
Like the soon - to - be-beatified John Henry Newman, who coined the
phrase and studied what it meant, there are Christians who want to steer safely
between the Scylla of fundamentalism and the Charybdis of modernism.
Federal programs for the poor, designed when the Kennedys discovered «the other America» through Michael Harrington, were seen as the work of distant planners who, in Alinsky's
phrase, failed to see «the difference
between the world as it is and the world as we would
like it to be.»
Overall it sounds
like they're trying to walk that fine line
between playing up the catch -
phrases people want to hear (and that will sell the magazine), and being true to the spirit of yoga.
Most of us use
phrases like «my luck ran out» and «I'm due for a win» when usually there is no ultimate relationship
between your odds of success in the current venture than in the prior.
Words and
phrases like «Constant Cravings,» «Bottomless Pit,» and «Promises, Promises» are distorted, stylized and sit in a precarious place
between abstraction and commercial design.
The quiet restraint of these works is
like a gentle exhale of breath
between bursts of painterly energy and reveals how the
phrase «Surface Work» can be mean very different things to different people.
And I think that beyond that, beyond the kind of scientific relationship
between mirror cells and mirror neurons, we even
liked the way the
phrase mirror cells somehow seemed to get the idea of these works being kind of individual microcosms that reflect the world or reflect the artist's own experiences.
By capturing the news anchor's facial expressions seconds after delivering the news and her occasional colloquial
phrases made during the report, and creating a set of ID -
like photos, produces complex images representing the tensions
between the official and the personal and the public and the intimate, respectively.
For instance, as long as articles on Smithson contain such cumbersome
phrases like - «anti-aesthetic dynamic relationships», «anti-formalist logic and a theoretical framework of the Picturesque», «the dialectic
between the physical landscape and its temporal context» - the subject is likely to remain the preserve of the hyper - educated elite.
Like the nearby
phrase «An Object Self - Defined» from the work «Self - Defined Object [green]», 1966, the artist forms the relationship
between words and art object, short - circuiting its separation, language and art, language in art, language as, or is art, the work professes to form a dialectic that results in a relationship to philosophical thought.
For Abstract composition, a black and white film projected here in 35 mm, Sietsema has taken
phrases from online auction sites («English hunting scene,» «painted waterfall,» «carved marble urn») and, using digital animation, punched the words into a cardboard sign that appears to rotate slowly,
like a coin flipping
between heads and tails.
I see no difference
between what is happening in the climate change debate courtesy of nutters
like Lew and Oreskes and what is happening in the wider community, where the unwitting use of politically incorrect words and
phrases is increasingly becoming the subject of ludicrous and lengthy official investigations which amount to little more than officially sanctioned witch hunts.
Perhaps I could have chosen my words more carefully to avoid the
phrase «dogmatically insist» and to avoid implying an equivalence
between those who are convinced by the core science (which, for all practical purposes, includes myself) and the
likes of Andrew Bolt, but to get one's knickers in a twist over that
phrase whilst ignoring my main argument is a serious misreading of my post — or, given Chris Warren's background, a symptomatic reading of ym post.
Why can't you people understand the difference
between «settled» and
phrases like weighted evidence and high confidence.
This is a big difference
between Bitbox and other hardware wallets
like Ledger and Trezor, which requires a process of having to write down a 24 - word seed
phrase.
It's not actually pronounced «Wow way,» making this an unusual tactic — for reference, it's more
like Hu - ah - way — which Dunagan said helps, «bridge the gap
between an easy - to - understand
phrase and the correct way to say the name.»
Use
phrases like «trained to...» to draw out the parallels
between your degree and employer needs.