To overcome the achievement gap that still exists
between poor and minority children and their more affluent peers, we must stay true to the law's core tenet — that all students, regardless of income, race, ethnicity or disability should have access to a quality education that prepares them for success in college and a career,» he said.
Not exact matches
The proposed reforms, outside
and inside schools — to reduce the test - score gap
between whites
and poor minorities; to help
poor minority families increase their income through steady work at livable wages
and then their
children's test scores will improve; to establish research - proven reading programs for every single,
poor, or
minority child; to give each kid a laptop computer — are endless
and uncertain in their outcomes.
To Democrats
and the civil rights community, stripping the federal role out of education would signal a return to times before No
Child Left Behind, when many states didn't even collect data about the achievement gap
between poor and minority students
and their peers.
No
Child Left Behind, first passed in 2002, was an ambitious, bipartisan attempt to close achievement gaps
between poor and minority students
and their peers by setting a goal for all students to eventually become proficient in reading
and math.
Though his ruling was about Connecticut, he spoke to a larger nationwide truth: After the decades of lawsuits about equity
and adequacy in education financing, after federal efforts like No
Child Left Behind
and Race to the Top, after fights over the Common Core standards
and high - stakes testing
and the tug of war
between charter schools
and community schools, the stubborn achievement gaps
between rich
and poor,
minority and white students persist.
The hijacking continued when the second President Bush called another summit that created the «No
Child Left Behind,» law which was intended to close the learning gap
between whites
and poor minorities.