By Lucas Rodgers Daily Local News (Chester County) Last year Pennsylvania had the highest public school funding gap in the country
between rich school districts and poor school districts, according to data from the United States Department of Education.
Not exact matches
Billy Easton of the Alliance for Quality Education said «the gap
between rich and poor
school districts is growing under Gov. Cuomo.»
He also joined Paladino is calling for education reform, declaring the disparity
between schools in
rich and poor
districts «the civil rights issue of our time.»
«The gap in per student funding
between the poorest 20 percent and
richest 20 percent of
school districts is $ 8,733 and has grown over the course of Cuomo's tenure.»
We want the gap
between rich and poor
school districts to close and all
school and educators be treated fairly.»
«Governor Cuomo's policies have caused the spending gap
between rich and poor
school districts to grow 24 percent to a record setting $ 9,923 per pupil,» said Jasmine Gripper, AQE's legislative director, in a statement after the budget passed.
Despite Cuomo's comments about the differences
between rich and poor
districts, his address brought a lukewarm response from the Alliance for Quality Education, which focuses on the wealth disparities among
schools.
While the court's 7 - to - 2 decision to invalidate the system was widely expected across Texas in recent weeks, the justices surprised observers by voting 5 to 4 to allow the legislature to wait until next year's regular session to come up with another solution to the problem of funding disparities
between rich and poor
school districts.
Taking a new tack toward resolving Michigan's long - running dispute over
school - finance equity, Gov. John M. Engler has announced a plan to help close the gap
between rich and poor
districts by making better - off systems bear more of the burden of
school - employee retirement costs.
Our current
school funding system often bolsters
school district boundaries
between rich and poor, holding resources in wealthy communities and keeping low - income students from accessing broader opportunities.
The gulf
between North Carolina's
richest and poorest
school districts is widening despite an effort by the legislature to close the gap, a recent study of local
school finance says.
But it wasn't until she was in college and read Savage Inequalities: Children in America's
Schools, the Jonathan Kozol book that exposed dramatic disparities in the quality of education
between rich and poor communities, that she realized her calling was to be a business administrator in a diverse
school district.
As noted above, SB 2145 makes strong, necessary improvement in bringing greater equity
between property - poor and property -
rich school districts.
Local
school districts rely heavily on the revenue that comes from local property taxes, creating funding disparities
between rich and poor
districts.
The Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System is being dropped by half of Massachusetts
school districts in favour of a new test (PARCC) which the Commissioner of the state's Department of Elementary and Secondary Education said would «help the state reduce the stubborn achievement gaps
between rich and poor, white and minority, by giving teachers better information about which kids need extra support».
There, facing a
school funding lawsuit, the legislature passed a sweeping act in 1993 that evened out
school funding
between rich and poor
districts, but also set high standards for achievement and created a high -
school graduation test requirement.
Lawmakers were working under a June 30 deadline set by the high court to enact a constitutional
school funding formula that addresses disparities
between rich and poor
districts.
While not every dollar a
school spends directly improves academic outcomes, a new report from Rutgers
school - finance expert Bruce Baker finds certain kinds of money very much do matter: extra funding for higher teacher salaries and more equitable distribution of resources
between rich and poor
districts, for example, are correlated with higher student achievement, especially for the neediest kids.
Heavy reliance on local revenues for
school funding exacerbated inequities in per pupil funding
between property -
rich and property - poor
districts.
Some education analysts argue that mixing the student bodies of these two
schools may be a vital factor in improving education, and a handful of
districts and private
schools have begun enacting so - called «economic integration» policies that seek to create income - diverse
schools, complete with
rich kids, poor kids and everyone in
between.
But the solutions to our
district's problems are not — and never have been — to privatize our precious community resources, to facilitate playdates
between rich and poor students, or to remake our neighborhood
schools as nexuses of gentrification and displacement in our rapidly changing city.
In fact, funding disparities
between North Carolina's
rich and poor
school districts have only grown since the late»90s.
In Massachusetts, the Legislature increased
school spending by $ 10 billion over time and sharply reduced the funding gaps
between rich and poor
districts.
That includes, according to Till and other critics, yawning pay gaps
between rich and poor counties and uncertainty for
school district leaders now tasked with negotiating scores of contracts with essential administration, critics say.
Some suggested that, with
districts presumably having to negotiate scores of contracts with
school personnel, it would exacerbate pay inequities
between rich and poor counties and spur more employment complaints or lawsuits.
They go to professional development for
school librarians, and to help provide equity
between poor and
rich districts» book budgets.