Sentences with phrase «between same sex»

Lastly, findings from the present study indicate adolescent sex may moderate associations among parental encouragement for PA, adolescent PA, and body satisfaction; thus, future work should also consider examining the moderating effects of sex between same sex and opposite sex parents.

This week, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires states to recognize and grant marriages between same sex couples in Obergerfell, et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et.

Since the Brenner v. Scott decision on January 6, 2015, marriage became legal between same sex and LGBTQ individuals in Florida.

Just because Florida state does not recognize marriage between same sex marriages (form), that does not mean that the couple lack personal capacity to marry.

The LSUC voted not to accredit TWU due to its community covenant that effectively bans sexual intimacy between same sex couples.

That's because, as of 2014, not all states recognize marriages between same sex couples.

When the bible was written, marriages weren't based on love, so the love between same sex people wasn't explored and was only spoken of between David and Jonathan.

The overwhelming majority reject and ignore Humanae Vitae, and most Catholics in the UK and the rest of Europe, and the US are also known (from research evidence) to disagree that sexual relations before marriage, [by] masturbation, after divorce, or between same sex couples are morally wrong».

Thus, in the same way would it not be possible to say that ALL sexual acts between same sex partners are joined under the general heading of homosexuality.

Not exact matches

So, fishon, why exactly do you think that a loving, monogamous relationship between two people of the same sex is sin?

Romans 1:26 - 27 is the ONLY verse in the entire Bible that references same sex behavior between women so this is the passage most used to oppress the gay community.

Sex without live is primal and feels dirty (my experience) but where love is it is perfect even when it is between two of the same gender.

Still, it may be worth pondering that in this brave new world, those who uphold the old and much derided «gender binary» — or, to speak more properly, the ancient understanding that there is a real and normative difference between the sexes — will be the ones who can actually see some sort of meaning, however misguided, in things like same - sex desire and gender dysphoria.

When a Christian organization appears to endorse same - sex unions, even in ways that avoid formal cooperation, the world views it as proclaiming, at least tacitly, that it does not believe that marriage is between man and woman or that sex is reserved for marriage.

Reacting to the result on Wednesday, Archbishop of Sydney Dr Glenn Davies said in a video posted online: «Although this won't prevent me from continuing to teach that marriage, in God's good design, is between a men and a woman... the reality will be, in a very short period of time, our Parliament will legislate for same - sex marriage.»

Support for the legalisation of same - sex marriage varied between states, ranging from 57.8 per cent in New South Wales to 74 per cent in the Australian Capital Territory.

The kind of relationships between two consenting adults of the same sex demonstrably abounding among us — relationships that are responsible and mutual, affirming and fulfilling — are not dealt with in the Scriptures.

The state essentially allowed any sort of sex — anal sex, adultery, one - night stands — between men and women, but forbade almost any intimate acts between same - sex couples.

Others believe that there can also be responsible use between committed and faithful members of the same sex.

Biola then issued a «statement on human sexuality» saying, «God's design for marriage and sexuality is the foundational reason for viewing acts of sexual intimacy between a man and a woman outside of marriage, and any act of sexual intimacy between two person of the same sex, as illegitimate moral options for the confessing Christian.»

I think the conversation between traditional Christian groups and the gay community is much wider than the narrow debate about the biblical view of same - sex relations.

Islam, in placing the responsibility on each individual, makes no distinction between human beings; each is given the same rights and responsibilities regardless of his sex, race, color, or other differences.

It will stagger your mind to see how radical the Gospel message was between the Partial Keepers of the Law of Moses and the Gentiles / Slaves / Women of Paul's day... and now, how radical the message of Christ is now, between the Partial Keepers of the Law of Moses versus the Remarried / Same Sex Married / Women of our day.

But somehow, not officiating ceremonies between same - sex couples is deemed different, by a fair number of people.»

But if there is no meaningful difference between a male — female couple conceiving a child naturally and same - sex couples conceiving children through surrogates and various technological means, then it follows that nothing of ontological significance attaches to natural motherhood and fatherhood or to having a father and a mother.

We also wish warmly to affirm those sisters and brothers, already in membership with orthodox churches, who — while experiencing same - sex desires and feelings — nevertheless battle with the rest of us, in repentance and faith, for a lifestyle that affirms marriage [between a man and woman] and celibacy as the two given norms for sexual expression.

In a 2015 poll, LifeWay Research found that 70 percent of evangelicals without gay or lesbian friends believe that «sex between people of the same gender is sinful, regardless of its legality,» while 62 percent of evangelicals with such friends say likewise.

And so the case for companionate marriage has been supplemented again and again by the argument that we must endorse reproductive technologies that eliminate any relevant difference between a male — female couple and a same - sex couple.

Your comparison of love between two people of the same sex to someone borrowing their father's car and puking in it, then driving it backwards into a tree is beyond offensive.

It had nothing to do with a loving relationship between two people of the same sex, and homosexuality was NOT the sin of Sodom in whatever form.

Research demonstrates that the psychological and social aspects of committed relationships between same - sex partners closely resemble those of heterosexual partnerships.

After all, if marriage requires actions or relations unique to male — female unions, then to say that marriage is between a man and a woman is akin to a tautology, and we could perhaps regard the question of how we approach same - sex relationships as an altogether different issue.

@YeahRight: Research demonstrates that the psychological and social aspects of committed relationships between same - sex partners closely resemble those of heterosexual partnerships.

Many of the responses to the Marriage Pledge from both sides of the divide on same - sex marriage have reflected substantial confusion over the distinction between Christian and civil marriage and what the role of the clergy is in the marriage ceremony.

Sexual acts between members of the same sex were condemned.

Same - sex marriage erodes the very purpose of marriage as a social institution and trivializes the intellectual, psychological, and biological distinctions between men and women.

This second point is important because the two issues are usually treated separately» as if what one argued about relations between members of the same sex was quite different from what one might argue about relations between people of different sexes.

The fold - out brochure, which landed in Iowa mailboxes last week and was provided to CNN by a Des Moines - area voter, draws a series of contrasts between Obama and Mitt Romney on the issues of abortion, same - sex marriage and insurance coverage for contraception.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

When noting the relationship between household members, same - sex couples who are married could mark their spouses as being «Husband or wife», the same response given by opposite - sex married couples.

Even same sex couples with children should enshrine the life giving relationship between a man and a woman because they remain dependent on this relationship for their children.

«Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex... Tradition has always declared that «homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.»

Calling both relationships the same thing renders the differences between the two types of relationships meaningless including an opposite sex couple's ability to create new life.

The kind of relationships between two consenting adults of the same sex demonstrably abounding among us - relationships that are responsible and mutual, affirming and fulfilling - are not dealt with in the Scriptures.

It's also important to remember that the most common forms of same - sex behavior in the ancient world were pederasty and sex between masters and slaves.

Churches would be in a stronger legal position if they were to stop conducting weddings altogether: «Churches might indeed better protect themselves against the possibility of any such litigation by deciding not to provide marriage services at all, since there could be no complaint then of discrimination in their provision of services as between same - sex and opposite - sex couples.»

By excising the requirement that Christian marriage be a «a lifelong union between a man and a woman,» along with the Augustinian tradition's second good of marriage, offspring, from the list of «purposes for which it was instituted by God,» marriage would be defined as open to same - sex couples whose sexual unions are not biologically fruitful.

(New numbering system) 1) The confusion between homosexuality and same - sex relationships - Earlier you said «Homosexual acts can't be condemned because they didn't exist.

In American culture today, we speak of the dichotomy between same - sex relations and opposite - sex relations, as opposed to sex ordered for the purpose of procreation and sex not ordered for the purpose of procreation.

Their story made me see that things aren't that simple, and that the «war» between Christianity and homosexuality represents a false dichotomy that is incredibly painful and destructive to Christians with same - sex attractions.