He makes the preliminary point very robustly, that there is no room in Catholic theology for any hiatus at
all between our scientific understanding of the world, and our faith.
In contrast, this is a work of theology in which a unity of purpose
between scientific understanding and religious truth is assumed.
Not exact matches
I don't think you
understand the difference
between a
scientific theory versus it's common usage in the English language.
Science writers Carl Sagan and Fritjof Capra have pointed out similarities
between the latest
scientific understanding of the age of the universe, and the Hindu concept of a «day and night of Brahma», which is much closer to the current known age of the universe than other creation myths.
Some don't
understand the difference
between a hypothesis and a
scientific theory.
As presented here, the hierarchical scheme shows why «
scientific» models of explanation, based on invariant relationships
between abstract properties, have failed to satisfy the historical
understanding.
The relation
between Christian faith and the
scientific way of
understanding nature involves many complex and unresolved issues, but the plain fact is that
scientific understanding had to grow largely under secular auspices, with too little encouragement and
understanding from the religious tradition.
He sees Whitehead as a
scientific realist striving after some sort of correspondence
between the world as
understood by modern physics and the world of direct experience (PW 214/236) Whitehead represents the opposite of Bertrand Russell in his phenomenalist period.
* sighs *... Yet another one who doesn't
understand the difference
between a theory,
scientific theory, faith, etc...
While Biblical hermeneutics provided the key to an
understanding of the role of women in the church and family, dialogue
between those whose traditions have heard the Word of God differently in other times and places held the key for the discussion of social ethics, and engagement with the full range of cultural activity (from psychotherapy to radical protest, from personal testimony to
scientific statement) was the locus for theological evaluation concerning homosexuality.
Darwin's theory of evolution, as
understood by most of the modern
scientific community, has nothing to say about the «gap»
between humans and «lower» animals, because no such gap is recognized.
The doctrine (widely held until recently) that «matter» itself is fully real (rather than an abstraction, derived from intellectual analysis of concrete really - existing things, as Aristotle held), and that such self - subsistent «matter» is intrinsically inert (as opposed to self - organizing), arguably reached its full flower in the late Renaissance.18 Part of contemporary divergence
between theistic and naturalistic approaches may be
understood to arise from overly complete internalization (by both naturalists and theists) of the cosmology that emerged from the
scientific revolution of the seventeenth century — the cosmology in which «matter» was full real, but intrinsically inert.
This paper reviews a novel approach to the
scientific understanding of the origin of life — and to development of biological order and diversity in general — and explores, in a preliminary way, possible relationship
between this new approach and some contemporary philosophical theologies of creation.
Charles Davis has made a useful attempt to mediate
between the unwillingness of political theologies to accept a role for philosophy and the human drive to
understand what is at work in any cultural phenomenon, among which theologies must be counted.3 Davis distinguishes
between «original» and «
scientific» theology.
The preceding investigation into the Newtonian and Whiteheadian theories of space and time structure suggests that there is a clear and definite parallel
between the two theories and argues that the parallel is significant because Newton and Whitehead share a common
understanding of the status and function of a uniform and independent space and time structure in
scientific inquiry.
The application of these categories gives an
understanding to
scientific methodology not only in the sense that these categories show an interconnection
between the fundamental issues and a consistent logic of their solutions, but also in the sense that this methodology has itself been set within the framework of a metaphysical system.
The difference
between education
understood only as training in technical skills within the ideology of the economic growth and education for promoting a technical society within the framework of a culture of «
scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform», is indeed great.
«
Scientific» bakers hold that sourdough bread can't be made without a thorough
understanding of the symbiotic chemical relationship
between yeast and lactobacilli.
At 9 a.m., Approximately 900 specialists from a variety of
scientific, psychological, social service and educational communities will gather at The Egg, Center for the Performing Arts Hart Theatre to consider promising research on how, through
understanding the emerging connections
between trauma and the science of brain development, children can overcome the long - term consequences of extreme trauma and adversity.
These Terms of Use constitute the entire agreement and
understanding between you and
Scientific American with respect to use of the website and the contents thereof, superseding all prior or contemporaneous communications.
Many graduate students and postdocs are unaware of the transferable skills they pick up during their
scientific training: identifying relevant problems, synthesizing information,
understanding the difference
between data and evidence, and drawing conclusions from evidence.
But the link
between scientific evidence and economic and social gains is not necessarily respected or
understood, he said.
He or she must be able to build and cross bridges
between different disciplines,
understand their
scientific languages, and develop a broad view on science in general.
That presents a challenge for scientists who are competing with that gap in
understanding between the public, the
scientific community, and lawmakers.
It would read and
understand scientific literature, connecting the dots
between studies and suggesting hypotheses that could lead to significant breakthroughs.
«It would be really nice if there were more discussion
between people that
understand science and the
scientific method and those that don't,» said Dennis Gallagher, another marcher who described himself as a private citizen scientist.
«Pharmacometric analysis is key to
understanding the relationship
between exposure and response, and this critical knowledge will help companies avoid late - stage failures,» says Jill fielder - Kelly, vice president of pharmacometric services and chief
scientific officer of Buffalo, New York — based Cognigen Corporation, a contract research organization (CRO).
For most of history the development of
scientific understanding was steady but slow, a function of the physical distance
between scientists, restricted educational opportunity, lack of resources and political interference.
NASA's Schmidt suggested that further public engagement to fill the gaps in
understanding between soundbites and
scientific literature would be useful, but that there are no guarantees.
The report shall assess the current
scientific and technical
understanding of the interplay
between the various technologies and emissions of air pollutants, identify hurdles to strategies that could cost - effectively reduce emissions of multiple pollutants, and make appropriate recommendations.
«He has written extensively and spoken widely to policy, business and
scientific audiences on the need for basing policy on strong science and
scientific assessment, and about the need to
understand the linkages
between science, the environment, economics and policy on major global environmental issues.
Just as the mesh
between new age
scientific research and traditional
understanding of the human body proves its effectiveness, so do the results!
Levine does not simply mean that one should not tell the child, «You have disorder X.» His comment in A Mind at a Time, «I have seen no convincing
scientific evidence that [Asperger's syndrome] exists as a discrete disorder of some kind like a strep throat» indicates a belief that a diagnostic category must have a clear boundary of symptoms and that the relationship
between the cognitive, neural, behavioral, and genetic factors must be
understood before the category is useful.
To this end, the Center has developed a three - stage knowledge transfer process: (1) Knowledge Synthesis — a critical analysis of cutting - edge science and program evaluation research to identify core concepts and evidence - based findings that are broadly accepted by the
scientific community; (2) Knowledge Translation — the identification of gaps in
understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate
scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3) Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person presentations.
This partnership
between FWI and HCDC illustrates how the challenge of science translation can be addressed within a mutually respectful, ongoing, collaborative process in which scientists, communications researchers, and other key stakeholders can become co-producers of a broadly
understood yet sophisticated
scientific message.
I recently wrote about how Thomas Kuhn's
understanding of
scientific revolutions, namely the shift from one paradigm to another, helps elucidate the differences
between the technocratic trend and this counter-programming.
We want pupils to be able to explore the links
between the science of yesterday and the technology of today and recognise how their lives are grounded on a bedrock of
scientific investigation and
understanding.
Various course activities will continue to explore the following: 1) the relationship
between content - specific lesson planning, enactment, and reflection; 2) what it means to teach three - dimensional science content that is aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards and reflects what the profession currently
understands about the learning of
scientific concepts; 3) rethinking procedural laboratory and textbook activities; and 4) methodologies to foster and maintain a positive
scientific classroom climate that incorporates all aspects of science proficiency.
Whether you agree or not (and far be it from us to dispute one of the best brains in
scientific history), you should
understand the common financial tools that use compound interest, such as annual percentage rate (APR) and annual percentage yield (APY)-- and, more specifically, the difference
between them.
BIO * 235, Microbiology (4 credits / 6 contact hours) $ $ Laboratory Course Fee Gen Ed Competencies:
Scientific Knowledge &
Understanding,
Scientific Reasoning This is an introduction to general microbiology.The course is designed to meet the needs of pre-allied health students as well as biology or science majors.Topics include the structure, physiology, and molecular biology of microorganisms as well as the interactions
between microbes and their hosts, including their role in the environment.Students also learn how microbes are studied and how they can cause disease and yet are essential to human well - being.
The Puppy Up Foundation's
scientific objectives are: Broadening our
understanding of the links
between human and companion animal cancer, creating a cross institutional collaborative platform, developing new approaches to research, and funding translational cancer studies that benefit both pets and people.
Linda's unique combination of
scientific training and hands - on experience with dogs and wolfdogs creates a bridge
between the worlds of research, dog trainers and pet parents as demonstrated in her presentation at the Pet 2015 Professional Guild (PPG) inaugural summit:
Understanding Research: Making the case for force - free training.
A
scientific conference promotes
understanding between cat supporters and wildlife advocates, and addresses the challenges of resolving conflicts involving cats, wildlife, and people.
Biologist and author Rupert Sheldrake believes that the strong connection
between humans and animals lies beyond our present
scientific understanding.
The Foundation's
scientific objectives are: Broadening our
understanding of the links
between human and companion animal cancer, creating a cross institutional collaborative platform, developing new approaches to research, and funding translational cancer studies that benefit both pets and people.
Focused on an interdisciplinary
understanding of art, we endeavor to creatively address
scientific issues as well as to blur the borders
between art, design objects, and display formats.
In a recent press release, The National Science Foundation said, «From
understanding climate change to predicting infectious disease outbreaks to engineering solutions to address disability,
scientific research is increasingly crossing the boundaries
between disciplines.»
Again a wide gap has developed
between what is
understood about global warming by the relevant
scientific community and what is known by policymakers and the public.
In my view, any healthy and valid discussion of economics should include, somewhere in the early stages, an
understanding of the vast difference
between these two titles, especially in light of
scientific understanding that has come about after Smith died over two hundred years ago.
«There's a real misalignment
between public
understanding of climate change and the
scientific reality of climate change, and meteorologists are part of that,» Olson said.