Sentences with phrase «between sea ice area»

What is the difference between sea ice area and extent?

For more on sea ice extent, see Frequently Asked Questions About Arctic Sea Ice: «What is the difference between sea ice area and extent?»

While climate models also simulate the observed linear relationship between sea ice area and CO2 emissions, they usually have a much lower sensitivity of the ice cover than has been observed.

Not exact matches

To do so, the authors examine the link between carbon - dioxide emissions and the area of Arctic summer sea ice, and find that both are linearly related.

A cloud front can be seen in the lower left, and dark areas indicate regions of open water between sea ice formations.

In the San Francisco Bay area, sea level rise alone could inundate an area of between 50 and 410 square kilometres by 2100, depending both on how much action is taken to limit further global warming and how fast the polar ice sheets melt.

Satellite data show that the annual minimum for Arctic sea ice area fell 7 percent per decade between 1980 and 2000 — but since 2000 it has fallen 14 percent per decade.

In the area surveyed, which lies to the north of the Fram Strait between Greenland and Svalbard, the sea - ice thickness was ca. 1.7 metres, roughly 50 centimetres more than was recorded in 2016.

On its own, sea level rise could inundate between 50 and 410 square kilometres of this area by 2100, depending on how much is done to limit further global warming and how fast the polar ice sheets melt.

Judah Cohen, a climate forecaster at Atmospheric and Environmental Research in Massachusetts, who issues seasonal snowfall forecasts several months in advance for his company's clients, said the relationship between sea ice loss and the Arctic Oscillation is a key area for future research to focus on.

Historically, a new low sea ice extent (area) is set every five years, with small recoveries in - between.

This means that all the energy going into the melting of sea ice, ice sheets and glaciers plus the warming of land and atmosphere is the tiny gap between the blue area and the red line.

On the other hand, during those periods between widespread glaciation, the water had melted from the ice sheets and polar areas, flowed, back into the oceans and sea level was as high or higher than now.

A period for which the SCL index is NOT «well defined», and an area many times larger than the Greenland Sea, behaving in a fashion for which we have no recent precedent according to literature — see, for instance the review article from Polyak et al, 2010 — «could» be natural since a possible relationship between sea ice and solar cycle length has been demonstrated, sort Sea, behaving in a fashion for which we have no recent precedent according to literature — see, for instance the review article from Polyak et al, 2010 — «could» be natural since a possible relationship between sea ice and solar cycle length has been demonstrated, sort sea ice and solar cycle length has been demonstrated, sort of.

Historically, a new low sea ice extent (area) is set every five years, with small recoveries in - between.

If all of the currently attainable carbon resources [estimated to be between 8500 and 13.600 GtC (4)-RSB- were burned, the Antarctic Ice Sheet would lose most of its mass, raising global sea level by more than 50 m. For the 125 GtC as well as the 500, 800, 2500, and 5000 GtC scenarios, the ice - covered area is depicted in white (ice - free bedrock in browIce Sheet would lose most of its mass, raising global sea level by more than 50 m. For the 125 GtC as well as the 500, 800, 2500, and 5000 GtC scenarios, the ice - covered area is depicted in white (ice - free bedrock in browice - covered area is depicted in white (ice - free bedrock in browice - free bedrock in brown).

The yellow outline is the median minimum sea ice extent for 1979 — 2000; that is, areas that were at least 15 percent ice - covered in at least half the years between 1979 and 2000.

Newly grown sea ice (greyish areas) forming between old floes, which survived the previous summer melt.

This means that all the energy going into the melting of sea ice, ice sheets and glaciers plus the warming of land and atmosphere is the tiny gap between the blue area and the red line.

They found find that the Arctic sea - ice minimum can be accurately forecasted from melt - pond area in spring with a strong correlation between the spring pond fraction and September sea - ice extent.

That is, I expect to go from a sea ice area of 2 or 3 million km ^ 2 to almost nothing in one melt season as a result of a storm driven by the temperature differential between the sea ice and the surrounding environment.

As a layman (which probably 99 % of us are on the topic of sea ice) and trying to learn something — it appears that people who are posting are sometimes not distinguishing between (1) surface area and (2) volume (surface area plus depth of old ice).

A large sector of what was remotely sensed to be multi-year sea ice at 7 to 9 + tenths ice cover, consisting primarily of multy - year ice floes, was in fact a surface of heavily decayed ice composed of some small multi-year floes (1 tenth) interspersed in a cover dominated by heavily decayed first - year floes (1 tenths) and overlain by new sea ice in areas of negative freeboard and in open water between floes.

Science: satellite data showing Arctic sea ice between 1979 and The white area shows a moving average of Arctic sea ice between 2003 and The darker blue surrounding the white area is the moving average for the sea ice between 1979 and Between 1979 and 2005, average Arctic sea ice dropped 20 % — a loss in area about the size of the U.S. state ofbetween 1979 and The white area shows a moving average of Arctic sea ice between 2003 and The darker blue surrounding the white area is the moving average for the sea ice between 1979 and Between 1979 and 2005, average Arctic sea ice dropped 20 % — a loss in area about the size of the U.S. state ofbetween 2003 and The darker blue surrounding the white area is the moving average for the sea ice between 1979 and Between 1979 and 2005, average Arctic sea ice dropped 20 % — a loss in area about the size of the U.S. state ofbetween 1979 and Between 1979 and 2005, average Arctic sea ice dropped 20 % — a loss in area about the size of the U.S. state ofBetween 1979 and 2005, average Arctic sea ice dropped 20 % — a loss in area about the size of the U.S. state of Texas.

It emphasises that there is a strong internal relationship between the formation, stability and extent of sea ‐ ice and the structure of the upper layer of the Arctic ocean: it is the relative area and depth of low - salinity arctic water above the halocline that are paramount to ice formation and its summer survival.

Judah Cohen, a climate forecaster at Atmospheric and Environmental Research in Massachusetts, who issues seasonal snowfall forecasts several months in advance for his company's clients, said the relationship between sea ice loss and the Arctic Oscillation is a key area for future research to focus on.

In the Arctic, the sea - ice area ranges between 9 and 12 x 106 km2 (as opposed to 4 and 19 x 106 km2 around Antarctica).

Based on the understanding of both the physical processes that control key climate feedbacks (see Section 8.6.3), and also the origin of inter-model differences in the simulation of feedbacks (see Section 8.6.2), the following climate characteristics appear to be particularly important: (i) for the water vapour and lapse rate feedbacks, the response of upper - tropospheric RH and lapse rate to interannual or decadal changes in climate; (ii) for cloud feedbacks, the response of boundary - layer clouds and anvil clouds to a change in surface or atmospheric conditions and the change in cloud radiative properties associated with a change in extratropical synoptic weather systems; (iii) for snow albedo feedbacks, the relationship between surface air temperature and snow melt over northern land areas during spring and (iv) for sea ice feedbacks, the simulation of sea ice thickness.

This chart, from Gagné et al, shows the area - averaged annual mean sea ice concentration anomaly between 1950 and 2005.

The area covered by sea ice in the Arctic has shrunk to its lowest level this week since satellite measurements began nearly 30 years ago, opening up the Northwest Passage — a long - sought short cut between Europe and Asia that has been historically impassable.

Anderson (Norwegian Space Center); 4.1; Statistical Prediction is based on the relationship between melting and freezing in the Arctic by comparing winter maximum sea ice area with the summer minimum sea ice area.