Sentences with phrase «between social groups»

The resulting prince increases and unemployment could lead to protests, the election of officials with extreme anti-American policies, and conflict between social groups along with the increase of crime and corruption.

Although I'm sure it varies between social groups, «what're you playing at the moment?»

The content - impoverished skill and vocabulary exercises conducted by the schools continue to leave large reading gaps between social groups.

There is every scientific reason to predict that an intensive focus on oral language development during the classroom reading period in early grades will not only raise reading achievement for all students, it will also help narrow the gap between social groups.

Alongside that, there's a focus on equity of outcomes — on the reduction of inequalities in outcomes between social groups.

Bridging leadership entails skills in managing bridging social capital, which is building productive links between social groups.

The main result, however, was to find a double dissociation between social groups and both animate and inanimate objects.

This also means that the actual need for birth centers differs between social groups.

Here we seek to develop a wider area of shared concerns, to draw upon a greater diversity of personal capacities, and to promote a freer interaction between social groups.

Not exact matches

Success stories like Harrison's are few and far between for social entrepreneurs, defined as «someone who targets an unfortunate but stable equilibrium that causes the neglect, marginalization, or suffering of a segment of humanity; who brings to bear on this situation his or her inspiration, direct action, creativity, courage, and fortitude; and who aims for and ultimately affects the establishment of a new stable equilibrium that secures permanent benefit for the targeted group and society at large,» by Roger L. Martin and Sally Osberg in a 2007 Stanford University report titled «Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition.&social entrepreneurs, defined as «someone who targets an unfortunate but stable equilibrium that causes the neglect, marginalization, or suffering of a segment of humanity; who brings to bear on this situation his or her inspiration, direct action, creativity, courage, and fortitude; and who aims for and ultimately affects the establishment of a new stable equilibrium that secures permanent benefit for the targeted group and society at large,» by Roger L. Martin and Sally Osberg in a 2007 Stanford University report titled «Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition.&Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition.»

The market implicitly does determine the answer to these questions, like the trade - off between the present and the future, or the different values it places on the needs of different social groups.

Before, social media was mainly used as one of the communication ways between family, friends or any groups.

It seeks to understand the social influences on buyers as well as understand social networking relationships between individual buyers, social buyer groups, and sellers.

Create groups of social networks, collaborate, and manage roles and permission levels between team members.

Even so committed an anti-Communist (and non-Marxist) as Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. took class conflict as self - evident, and in The Vital Center (1949) and elsewhere he depicted the central theme of American politics as the struggle for power between the business community and all other social groups.

If such a thing existed, «righteous» or «unrighteous,» then the corrext labeling process would explore the morality of the actions between differing social groups.

Having seen an Arab chieftain's son, who had attended the American University in Beirut, make his decision between the old nomadic life of his clan, still living in tents, and the new town life which his education made possible, one vividly understands that, choosing the former, he inevitably chose submergence in the social solidarity of his group as against emergence into the individualism of a commercial community.

Of course, «too much» and «too little» are relative concepts since socioeconomic norms vary widely from culture to culture and between the diverse social groupings within each culture.

The most dramatic difference between the older and younger groups is in social class.

There is plenty to say about how that break heralded sexual and expressive individualism, but in light of the LAST DAYS interest in the tensions between «group social life» and «ferocious pairing off,» we should also compare the dominance of couple - centered dances from the waltz -LRB-?)

Today, as in the eighth century before Christ, we find greed, exploitation, callous indifference to human need, and vast amounts of conflict and strife between nations and social groups.

The «communal tensions» between the groups were «of major importance in the life of the nation,» Herberg added, suggesting that they began non-divisive discussions about the limits of American democracy and allowed all 96 percent of Americans who identified as Protestant, Catholic, or Jew to have some social, political, and cultural recognition in America.

In dealing with the relation between groups in America we may distinguish between three dimensions along which dominance can be measured: the cultural, the political, and the social.

One who understands the essence of man in terms of the dialogical relation between men must walk a narrow ridge between the individualistic psychology which places all reality within the isolated individual and the social psychology which places all reality in the organic group and in the interaction of social forces.

In distinction to it he now set the sphere of the «social» in which many individual existences are bound into a group with common experiences and reactions but without any personal relation necessarily existing between one person and another within the group.

Feminism challenges the legitimacy of sex roles Along with other social movements, feminism is rooted in the critique that a society so constructed that certain people and groups profit from inequalities — between men and women, rich and poor, black and white, etc. — is a society in which money is more highly valued than love, justice, and human life itself.

This will provide space for the nuanced discussions between what sociologist Robert Nisbet called the «laissez - faire of social groups.»

Niebuhr said that the thesis of his book was that a «sharp distinction must be drawn between the moral and social behavior of individuals and of social groups, national, racial, and economic; and that this distinction justifies and necessitates political policies which a purely individualistic ethic must always find embarrassing.

One of the «four factors which decisively govern the fate of social groups» according to his analysis, is «the iron compulsion of nature that the bodily necessities of food, clothing and shelter be provided».20 Whitehead continues: «The rigid limits which are thereby set to modes of social existence can only be mitigated by the growth of an understanding by which the interplay between man and the rest of nature can be adjusted.»

Out of the quest of social groups for an understanding of the connection between specific beliefs and actions, and the reactions of the universe, as well as the meaning of human salvation, religion grows and develops.

It argues that a sharp distinction must be drawn between «the moral and social behavior of individuals and of social groups, national, racial, and economic; and that this distinction justifies and necessitates political policies which a purely individualistic ethic must always find embarrassing.

Too often women friends of mine have told me of incidents in Gestalt groups where they have made connections between their problems and the social system and been told to quit blaming outsiders for their problems.

Prince Charles has warned that social media is being used to encourage and spread fears between different religious groups.

It's about power, control, money, politics, inequality between the races and genders, who's in and who's out (of the Kingdom, of the social group, and more) and many other things that don't pass the «smell test.»

By social ethic I do not mean something opposed to a personal ethic, but one which is concerned with the issues between groups and nations where the decisions taken alter the lives of multitudes of people and the direction of history.

Belonging in a group always involves a tension between our personal identity, our own sense of self, and our social identity which reflects the claims of our family or community through prescribed roles and behaviors.

This myth proposes that actual genetic differences exist between ethnic groups or social classes, differences distinctive enough that society is justified in allowing «more naturally capable» groups to be responsible for making the decisions that affect everyone.

And as for the general character of thought — patterns peculiar to such groups, a collective or social imagination, or what Castoriadis calls a «social instituting imaginary,» may be needed to explain the differences between cultures and their peculiar destinies (RI 149).

In general, the negative relationship between religious values and social compassion was strongest for the Protestant groups, especially the Baptists.

• The rejection of social and economic privileges which discriminate between different groups of people, which prevents the emergence of a class system.

The joint political and social ventures of the liberationist and socialist groups established an enduring link between the two.

When social - change goals involve building bridges between estranged groups, confrontation methods are useful.

Social change often involves conflicts and communication problems between various groups, each with its own identity, values, commitments, goals, and power dynamics.

In practice social - scientific approaches necessarily emphasize the historical and social distance between first - century Jesus group members and Christians of today.

Today a common model is economic or social — the quality of life as measured by social and political norms is what is most likely to lead to expressions of violent disagreement between people and groups.

Neither is its primary function to be found in the arena of political decision making or the struggle for power between competing social groups.

Striking differences between the social background of the two groups were found.

Other developmental outcomes (such as motor development and social - emotional behavior) also failed to differ between the two groups.

It began in 2005, as a joint project between the NHS and NCT, which secured local health authority funding to set up a breastfeeding support group in an area of social deprivation with low breastfeeding rates.

Given the republican interest in social cohesion, and given its necessity for genuine democracy, it is similarly disappointing that republicans have thus far largely overlooked cultural relations between the have - nots and the majority group.