Sentences with phrase «between socialism»

This is not a war between socialism and freedom it is a war between totalitarians (from the [fake] left AND from the [fake] right -LCB- control both sides of the argument -RCB--RRB- and the honest citizens of the world.

The original work is a growing video production based on the nineteenth century debate between socialism and capitalism featuring Karl Marx and Adam Smith as the main characters in a puppet show directed at children.

Tim Donnelly routinely frames the governor's race as «an epic showdown between socialism and freedom.»

But our choice is not between socialism and pristine capitalism.

This development, he urged, should be welcomed rather than resisted by the churches, since there is a natural affinity between socialism and the Christian ethic.

The hypocrisy of the «morale majority» supporting the militaristic and trickle down policies of Reagan and the Bushes was never lost on me and the natural alliance between Socialism and true Christianity should come as no surprise.

This election has come down to a fight between Socialism and Capitalism.

There have been all sorts of calls for a «third way» between socialism and capitalism, calls which promise to help the poor, but by and large they have worsened conditions for the poor.

Not exact matches

The books also deal with the chasm between rich and poor and the idea of socialism as a solution to capitalism's ills.

But it is of critical importance to the choice between capitalism and socialism, and it is directly relevant to what he has to say about sin.

In Centesimus Annus and elsewhere, it is clear that the Catholic Church does not propose an alternative form of political economy, and the idea of a «third way» somehow located between capitalism and socialism is explicitly rejected.

There were, as any historian can tell you, the very closest links between 20th - century socialism in Britain and Christianity, especially Nonconformity.

It is beyond the scope of this review to pursue the connections between Heidegger's philosophy of Being and his ardent if brief flirtation with National Socialism.

We remember the old question, «What is the difference between capitalism and socialism?»

However, there are vast differences within each of these two categories between economic systems that are nominally grouped together, greater differences than there are between some systems that we place on opposite sides of the capitalism / socialism dividing line.

If one looks at the world it is clear that the big differences are not between these two, but between these as a group on the one hand and despotic elite capitalism grouped with despotic full socialism on the other hand.

To repeat: a cursory look at the nations of the world makes it clear that the important differences in social responsibility and freedom are between the democratic types (of both capitalist and socialist economic system) and the despotic types, not between capitalism and socialism as such.

The similarities between democratic / free enterprise / responsible capitalism and democratic / partial socialism are so strong that it is hard to say where socialistic capitalism ends and capitalistic socialism begins.

There is, for this reason, a legitimate connection between the nation and socialism which supports rather than obstructs the international character of socialism as a force for world unity and peace.

(Ibid., p. 139 f.) The decision between the centralistic socialism of political power and the spontaneous socialism of genuine social change is, for this reason, the most important decision of the next generation.

Nevertheless, in spite of the great advances made by workers and in spite of having seen that socialism can not offer them a worker's utopia or even an alternative to working for someone else, we must take note that there are still a couple of very troubling aspects to the division between owners and workers.

Both types of socialism can point to accomplishments which include (1) a vast improvement in education and health care for the general populace, to the point where the education and medical care of the poor is in some cases better than that available to them even in advanced capitalist countries; and (2) a reduction in the disparity between the poor and the rich, through supplying goods and services to the poor and also through elimination or heavy taxation of the rich.

Many of those less friendly to the market than the Pope seem to be under the impression that when he talks about a framework circumscribing the market, he means some kind of mixed system halfway between the efficiency of the market and the «ideal» of socialism — that elusive «third way» that former Czech President Vaclav Klaus has said is the surest path to the Third World.

In the Manuscripts Marx draws an important distinction between atheism and socialism.

In the United States the distinction between democratic socialism and Russian Communism was successfully obscured, so that the former was associated with all the evils of the latter.

I think the primary difference between Coots as being representative of Christians and Pol Pot representing atheists is that Coots, like many Christians, claimed to believe in a specific creed whereas there is no atheist creed, Pol Pot pushed a radical form of agrarian socialism on his people.

He traces the conflict in Germany between Lutheran and Calvinist conceptions of the relationship of theology to society, and shows the problems of each when faced with socialism.

It is a political book about the clashes between capitalism and socialism.

Only a few places still mark the divide between pluralistic societies and those forms of socialism that seek to liberate humanity through a state monopoly of ideology, politics and economics.

Pesch and his Jesuit successors developed the idea of «solidarism,» by which they intended «a mean between individualism and socialism.»

If there is a profound disparity between the present American economic system and basic American values, and if many Americans have so argued, then it is all the more surprising that some version of socialism, as the main alternative to capitalist economic organization in the modern world, has not found favor in the United States.

The general rejection of socialism in America by the by the 1850s, after an earlier flurry of interest, is to be explained far more by the victory of the ideology of individualism than as a choice between alternate ways to order a new industrial economy whose outlines were as yet hardly discernible.

The choice is between market reforms and slightly higher taxes, or democratic socialism and much higher taxes.

(At a meeting in Mavelikara on the 13th Feb 96, where EMS, gave the Bishop M. M. John Lecture on The Significance of Dialogue between Religion, and Secular ideologies for building a New Humanism, as chairman I raised the question whether a future Socialism would not require the following changes in the Marxist ideology so as not to fall into Stalinism.

I have repeatedly expressed my opinion on the relations between the Socialist Movement and the theories of Socialism, these relations are by no means rigid or immutable.

In a celebrated New Yorker article, Heilbroner put it dramatically: «Less than seventy - five years after it officially began, the contest between capitalism and socialism is over; capitalism has won» (January 23, 1989).

Cohn was interested in the possible similarities between these chiliastic movements and the twentieth - century totalitarian movements of communism and German national socialism.

somewhere down the road, government should choose between a) step back at the interventions, or b) follow on and embrace full socialism

How will you reconcile the tension between national collectivism and international socialism not to say actually seeking to dismantle the Nation as an imagined community at all.

The deficit declaration may be dismissed as unwisely late by critics (my own doubts focus on the lack of ambition of shoestring socialism) yet it deflects Tory attacks in an election where 1 % this way or that might be the difference between victory and defeat.

In 1938, Harold Macmillan wrote a book entitled The Middle Way, advocating a compromise between capitalism and socialism, which was a precursor to the contemporary notion of the Third Way.

Seems like most people here make a distinction between the technocratic RBE, and the democratic communism, but doesn't that just make RBE the socialism stage (at least as the version defined by Lenin), before the communism stage of material abundance which naturally leads to a society which doesn't require government or «democracy» as it is known today?

Also, of the other divide in the Labour Party between committee room - based resolutionary socialism and practical, up - to - your - armpits - in - doorsteps activism, Jim is something of an inspiration among the latter.

Recent polling shows that young people between the ages of 18 and 29 have a slightly more positive view of «socialism» than «capitalism.»

«Walter Mosley, author of the Easy Rawlins mysteries, proposes a «shotgun marriage» between capitalism and socialism.»

Her artistic projects have analyzed the remnants of socialism in the former Soviet Union, the politics between Ethiopia and Italy and more abundantly, the consequences of colonialism in the Americas.

Splitting his time between Paris and his native Cluj, Mircea Cantor makes work that centers around themes of cultural history, memory, and displacement, echoing his upbringing in Romania during its tumultuous transition from state socialism to liberal democracy.

It takes as evidence the few available installation photographs, the title and exhibition brochure composed by Szeemann, reports of the carefully curated audience that attended the show's opening reception, the contemporaneous relationship between Western European capitalism and Soviet socialism, and Switzerland's attitude toward immigrant workers.

There has been no clearer comparison between capitalism and socialism than the two Germanys that were created at the end of World War II — socialist / communist East Germany, under Soviet hegemony, and capitalist West Germany, with strong ties to Western Europe and the United States.

Yes, in the USA we do not see any real difference between communism and socialism.