Sentences with phrase «between synoptic»

The association between the synoptic forcing of dust events and the role of the Bodélé LLJ has been verified here by running a regional model for all large - scale dust events (established from plumes deflating from the Bodélé in MODIS imagery)(32) from January to March between 2002 and 2005 by using the Fifth Generation National Center for Atmospheric Research / Penn State Regional Mesoscale Meteorological Model, Version 5 (MM5) previously set up for the Bodélé domain (31).

Direct observations of soil moisture are not assimilated; analyses are constrained instead by the mismatches between synoptic temperature and humidity observations and corresponding background forecasts, in snow - free regions when meteorological conditions are appropriate.

Two difficulties in particular stand in the way of the acceptance of the tradition, the slowness and difficulty with which it became established, and the difference between the Synoptic and the Johannine portraits of Jesus.

and it has two of the hallmarks of the differences between the synoptic tradition and Judaism and the early Church respectively, which we have argued are derived from the teaching of Jesus: a use of Kingdom of God in reference to the eschatological activity of God (S. Aalen, ««Reign» and «House»...», NTS 8, 229ff.

It can be seen from the above that there are real differences between the synoptic tradition on the one hand and the remainder of the New Testament on the other, as far as the usage of Kingdom of God is concerned.

Pursuing our criterion of dissimilarity, we must seek to determine whether these elements of difference between the synoptic tradition and Judaism are also differences between the synoptic tradition and the remainder of the New Testament.

I think the difference between the synoptics and John, and the differences within the synoptics (Luke has more stuff I think.)

Faithlessinfatima asked: «James... are you familiar with the differences between the synoptics and the gospel of John?»

what's yr opinion on the differences between the synoptics and John if the following quote accurately describes the problem....

Not exact matches

The evidence indicates that the written sources of our Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are not later than c. AD 60; some of them have even been traced back to notes taken of our Lord's teaching while His words were actually being uttered... We have then in the Synoptic Gospels, the latest of which was complete between 40 - 50 years after the death of Christ, material which took shape at a still earlier time, some of it even before His death, and which, besides being for the most part 1st hand evidence, was transmitted along independent and trustworthy lines.»

Critical scholarship in the 19th century distinguished between the «biographical» approach of the synoptics and the «theological» approach of John, and began to disregard John as a historical source.

It should be read with careful attention to the author's methodology and, particularly, to the relationship between this book and his History of the Synoptic Tradition.

Some scholars have perceived commonalities in the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) that with this corroboration between the three would suggest greater authenticity.

When we add the obvious point that the term itself is very frequently to be found in the synoptic tradition and comparatively infrequently outside it, then it becomes clear that we are fully entitled to claim that the real and significant differences between the use within the synoptic tradition and outside it call for an explanation.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

Furthermore, there are contradictions in the New Testament synoptic gospels and between the epistles and acts.

Augustine was one of the first to discuss the likely relationship between the three synoptic gospels... I am all for questioning, but I find it interesting that this was not questioned as such until this time.

The Synoptic Jesus» focus on the urgency of human readiness to receive God's promised basileia on earth is a subject of much scholarly debate regarding the tension between the signs of its arrival — the blind see, the crippled walk, as proleptic manifestations of Jesus» mediation of God's rule here and now — and the promise of a fullness of that reign yet to be consummated.

In the article, Harrison discusses such «difficulties» in the text as problems with chronologies, differences in numbers, non-parallel accounts in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4).

My point is that a close reading suggests a multiplicity of ideas and beliefs that we are priviliged to witness while it's under construction, the Jerusalem controversy being one good example.Furthermore, the fact that we're able to understand that each of the synoptics significantly differ from each other and we can observe contrast and similiarity between them and John's gospel, as well as Paul's letters suggests a process that speaks loudly of how religious narrative develops in communities that seek the meaning of the «core events».

How much time had elapsed between the temptation and the return to Galilee, and what Jesus had been doing in the meantime, the Synoptic Gospels do not say.

This may be granted at once, but then the point has to be made that the literary relationships between the texts of the synoptic gospels are more complex than any theory of direct relationship imagines.

The Book of Revelation, for example, is at odds with the Synoptic Gospels in having not one resurrection, but two, with a millennial reign of the Messiah on earth between them.

Differences between John and the Synoptic Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke are often called the «synoptic» Synoptic Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke are often called the «synoptic» synoptic» gospels.

Of the two major emphases in the early church with regard to the relation between the risen and exalted Lord and his people, one, far more prominent in the Synoptic record, is the hope of his return in glory to judge the world and inaugurate the new age.

There are considerable differences between John's gospel and the synoptics.

But the similarity between John's account and the accounts of the synoptics stops at this point.

Jesus» resurrection, and upon the message, (a) the expectation of the coming judgment, with Christ as judge, and (b) the promise of salvation of those who repented and trusted in him, taken along with (c) the purely subsidiary and qualifying or evidential reference to Jesus» earthly life and ministry — this very relation between hope, proof, and historic fact is the relation which prevailed in the period of the oral tradition of the sayings and deeds of Jesus, and eventually fashioned the structure of the Synoptic Gospels.

The almost complete absence of parables is hard to account for, and while allowance must be made for the tendency of the fourth evangelist to introduce into the discourses of Jesus the fruit of his own reflections and meditations, there is a striking difference between the style in which Jesus speaks in this gospel and that of the short pithy utterances of Jesus in the synoptic gospels.

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope [LSST], being built atop Cerro Pachón in Chile, is a $ 450 million megaproject that will truly cement the relationship between astronomy and informatics.

Other imaging surveys like the Dark Energy Survey and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope measure dark energy in a different way, by observing how matter that lies between observed galaxies and us distorts that light.

Agreed that the marriage between climatology and synoptic dynamics is important, and is a sorely missing ingredient in attempts to attribute extreme events to AGW.

There has been a recent emphasis in decadal - scale prediction, and also creating a marriage between climate and fields such as synoptic - dynamic meteorology... something relatively new (and a different sort of problem, than say, estimating the boundary condition change in a 2xCO2 world); as Susan Solomon mentioned in her writing, a lot of people have become much more focused on the nature of the «noise» inherent within the climate system, something which also relates to Kevin Trenberth's remarks about tracking Earth's energy budget carefully.

I don't have strong background in this field, although I think this marriage between climatology and synoptic dynamics is at the frontier of atmospheric science research.

Based upon this synoptic linkage, an empirical relationship between the precipitation diurnal amplitude and low - level circulation fields of the CFSv2 is derived.

The 3,000 to 5,000 km wavelength is the typical separation between high - and low - pressure synoptic weather systems in the middle and higher latitudes.

Her current research includes understanding large - scale temperature extreme events in Alaska and Canada, relating ice core data at the McCall Glacier in Alaska to the large - scale synoptic climatology, and understanding linkages between observed changes in the Arctic and weather in the mid-latitudes.

In order to study if an underrepresentation of weak magnetic fields in the Carrington rotation synoptic charts is the explanation for the difference between our model and the observation, full - disk images with higher spatial and temporal resolution should be analyzed in future.

The difference between modeled and observed TSI might be the result of underrepresented weak magnetic fields in the Carrington rotation synoptic charts, an uncertainty in the TSI measurement, or a decline of the global temperature of the photosphere.

Based on the understanding of both the physical processes that control key climate feedbacks (see Section 8.6.3), and also the origin of inter-model differences in the simulation of feedbacks (see Section 8.6.2), the following climate characteristics appear to be particularly important: (i) for the water vapour and lapse rate feedbacks, the response of upper - tropospheric RH and lapse rate to interannual or decadal changes in climate; (ii) for cloud feedbacks, the response of boundary - layer clouds and anvil clouds to a change in surface or atmospheric conditions and the change in cloud radiative properties associated with a change in extratropical synoptic weather systems; (iii) for snow albedo feedbacks, the relationship between surface air temperature and snow melt over northern land areas during spring and (iv) for sea ice feedbacks, the simulation of sea ice thickness.