Sentences with phrase «between traditional owner»

Confidentiality in mediation with Traditional Owner groups is complex, therefore confidentiality protocols should be negotiated between Traditional Owner groups upfront.

Native title agreements can clarify the nature of the partnership between the traditional owner group and government and define the way in which government carry out their role.

The above issues are directed to building relationships between traditional owner groups and other stakeholders so as to advance the traditional owners in achieving their economic and social development goals.

Capacities and skills that could be utilised in native title agreements differ between traditional owner groups, but may include: the ability to use and manage their natural environment sustainably, cohesive cultural and social relationships, a traditional decision making structure, a unique relationship to the land of their ancestors, and values that are shared by the members of the group.

Accordingly, the perception of synergy between a traditional owner group's economic development and that of the region is decreased in the metropolitan area.

Native title varies in form between traditional owner groups, because its content is given by the particular traditional laws and customs of each group, 126 and because the history of settlement across Australia (effecting extinguishment of native title rights) differs from region to region.

This means that the native title process takes place largely within a legal framework, with legal tests establishing the threshold for the commencement of negotiations between a traditional owner group and the government, and legal definitions of rights determining the outcomes that may be achieved.

The issue of the relationship between traditional owner groups and the rest of the community was raised in the consultations and discussed briefly in chapter 2.

It also establishes a good foundation for engagement between the traditional owner group and the government.

The complexity of existing or new relationships between traditional owners effects the way the group is able to make decisions.

[136] Those negotiations are now taking place between the Traditional Owners of all the Aboriginal land on the coastline, the government and the fishing industry.

Integrating local and regional planning can also provide a number of ways to approach divisions between groups within a community, including divisions between traditional owners and those with historical links to the same land.

The South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council (SWALSC) is employing a regional approach to manage native title claims in its NTRB area and facilitate engagement between traditional owners and other parties.

Agreements provide the framework by which a partnership approach between traditional owners, government and industry can be constructed.

Formalising the links between traditional owners and the communities that they live in through local and regional structures will provide a framework to consider the issues that arise for traditional owners, both as members of the local community and as part of a larger network of traditional owners in the region.

It provides a mechanism for divisions between different interest groups within the community, including between traditional owners and other Indigenous residents with an historical association with the land, to be discussed and resolved.

Striking the balance between traditional owners existing decision making processes and other governance mechanisms is challenging and difficult to prescribe.

The framework sets the core principles of what agreements between traditional owners and the Victorian Government would cover.

There is a further issue concerning potential conflict of interests between traditional owners or native title holders and resident Indigenous peoples whose ties are from elsewhere.

For example, the Bill does not acknowledge that there may be distinctions between the traditional owners and the community that live on the land and receive the benefit of public housing.

In the native title context, this will improve relationships between traditional owners and governments, and facilitate positive relationships between traditional owners and external parties to native title negotiations.

The Argyle Diamond Mine Participation Agreement (the Argyle Agreement) is a registered Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) between Traditional Owners of the East Kimberley region of Western Australia, the Kimberley Land Council and Argyle Diamond Mine (Argyle Diamonds).

In 2001, Argyle Diamonds and the traditional owners came to the table to renegotiate and renew the relationship between the traditional owners and the mining company.

A relationship that also needs to be considered in redirecting the native title system to the economic and social development of traditional owner groups is the effect this might have on the relationship between traditional owners and other members of their communities.

The principles in this document concern the relationship between Traditional Owners and custodians, on the one hand, and Developers on the other, and are based on the human rights of self determination and development, equality and non-discrimination, and protection & maintenance of culture.

In the native title context, this will not only improve relationships between traditional owners and governments, it will also facilitate positive relationships between traditional owners and external parties to native title negotiations.

Important partnerships may also develop between traditional owners and industry groups, particularly where native title negotiations arise from an industry or resource development project.

Respondents commented that the distinction between traditional owners and other community members may lead to inequities within Indigenous communities.

Not exact matches

In addition to spotlighting the correlation between start of withdrawals and age 70.5 onset of RMDs, the EBRI researchers found that approximately one - fourth of traditional IRA owners aged 71 and older withdrew more than the amount required under RMD rules.

Until Amazon and publishers find a way to allow e-book owners to «lend» their e-books, short of lending their entire kindle, there will continue to be fundamental differences in the ownership rights between e-books and traditional books.

Inexpertly applied, traditional training methods can cause serious harm to the relationship between man and dog, as the dog becomes fearful of his owner

They were a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.

We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.

This systemic approach is reflected in the principles in the Discussion Paper (at Annexure 1), which require that agreements build relationships between key stakeholders and integrate activities at various levels to achieve the development goals of traditional owners.

Integrating the structures that represent native title holders into broader community and regional structures would enable greater co-ordination between the economic and social benefits accruing to the various groups within the community, including the traditional owner groups.

When considering the importance of relationship building to the economic and social development of traditional owners, one should also consider relationships that exist between parties separate from the traditional owner group.

An example of this is in the recent agreement in South Australia between various exploration companies, the Yandruwandha / Yawarrawarrka Traditional Land Owners (Aboriginal Corporation), and the State government which established a process for agreed land access and usage.

Despite this, the changing and transforming nature of the relationship between Indigenous Australia and the broader Australian context provides greater opportunity for traditional owners to assess, design and modify governing structures to respond to their changing needs and values but most importantly to provide effective governance.

Such an approach presents an opportunity to not only resolve native title claims but to provide for a more comprehensive type of agreement that addresses the co-existing relationship between native title holders and other tenure holders; as well as building a foundation to respond to the social and economic goals of traditional owners.

The principles seek to orient native title agreement making to the broader needs and goals of the traditional owner community, and encourage ongoing engagement between the parties beyond the agreement.

The Wadeye agreement recognises and respects traditional owner rights and; aims to work towards respect, peace and unity between families and clans.

[14] Victorian Traditional Owner Land Justice Group, Towards a Framework Agreement between The State of Victoria and the Victorian Traditional Owner Land Justice Group, Discussion Paper, 26 August 2006, p 5.

The Cape York Agreement establishes the basis for a long term relationship between the parties that is not only equitable and based on the informed consent of the traditional owners of the region, but is conducive to long term development projects on the land concerned.

For the past year, between the Full Federal Court and the High Court decisions, the Northern Land Council, which represents the Traditional Owners in the case, has been issuing free permits to commercial fishermen to use the inter-tidal zone.

The development of a hierarchy of local and regional structures under the new arrangements provides an opportunity for the interests of traditional owners to be represented and integrated into a reinvigorated engagement between communities and government.

Far from native title agreements being a vehicle for a partnership between government and the traditional owner group to attempt to break the cycle of Indigenous disadvantage, they often represent nothing more than a settlement of a legal claim by adversaries.

Such leveraging can not only deliver economic benefits to traditional owners, it can also build relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

The relationship between legal standards and traditional owners» economic development arose in all consultations.

Such a nexus between cultural responsibilities and a perceived alienated modern metropolitan lifestyle eludes many who have romantic notions of what a traditional owner's lifestyle should be and what cultural responsibilities might be.

Since the recognition of native title in 1992, a degree of tension has emerged between groups whose rights are based in the land rights system and traditional owners who might benefit from a native title claim.