He argues for the «need to go
beyond authorial motivation to theological relation,» i.e., to the Jesus Christ of sacred history who is our ultimate norm in faith and conduct.
To do this, we need to go
beyond authorial motivation to theological relation Moreover, it is neither the faith of Jesus (as in Ebeling) nor the Christ of faith (as in Bultmann and Tillich) but the Jesus Christ of sacred history that is our ultimate norm in faith and conduct.
Not exact matches
Childs has sought to make a claim for the stability of the final form of the text that respects the critical insight into
authorial diversity, yet presses
beyond this toward an appreciation of the normative claims of the text in its received form.