Not exact matches
Crude ORs were calculated in the program, thus avoiding
biases that may have arisen from
adjustments to different confounders done in each
study.
To correct for limitations, Bauchner et al suggested four standards for breast feeding
studies.22 These include avoidance of detection
bias, clear definition of the outcome event, clear definition of breast feeding, and
adjustment for potential confounding variables.
We carefully
studied issues raised by skeptics:
biases from urban heating (we duplicated our results using rural data alone), from data selection (prior groups selected fewer than 20 percent of the available temperature stations; we used virtually 100 percent), from poor station quality (we separately analyzed good stations and poor ones) and from human intervention and data
adjustment (our work is completely automated and hands - off).
We carefully
studied issues raised by skeptics:
biases from urban heating (we duplicated our results using rural data alone), from data selection (prior groups selected fewer than 20 percent of the available temperature stations; we used virtually 100 percent), from poor station quality (we separately analyzed good stations and poor ones) and from human intervention and data
adjustment (our work is completely automated and hands - off).
Before making
adjustments to the data, in any scientific
study, it is necessary to have solid evidence of a
bias, not just hypothesis and speculative reasoning.
While the various
studies have identified possible sources of
bias, the lack of documentary evidence for the changes and the degree of speculation concerning the geographical extent, duration and timing of the changes makes the
adjustments no less ad hoc than the simple
adjustment.
Berkeley Earth also has carefully
studied issues raised by skeptics, such as possible
biases from urban heating, data selection, poor station quality, and data
adjustment.
NOAA released only what was nonresponsive to the inquiry into what role motivated reasoning and political
bias may have played in the
adjustments, questions that are totally reasonable given graphs like this and this even before the Watts
study.
Concerns that may be relevant for this
study included a possible
bias in reporting or interpretation of somatic symptoms and limited sensitivity to detecting mild
adjustment problems.
Some researchers have argued that associations between abuse and
adjustment problems can be explained by reporting
biases because many
studies of the effects of physical maltreatment use samples for which maltreatment is identified by referral to social service agencies.6 Of the community - wide population of maltreated children, those who are referred may represent a
biased, more problematic subgroup.