Clearly a personal
biased against the player.
Not exact matches
The
bias against young
players was such that the NCAA actually institutionalized it.
These comments have provoked the obvious reaction from Arsenal fans, who have been hysterical in their criticism of their former
player, although this is hardly the first time he has come out with an outrageous comment, or more been overly
biased against Wenger's side.
I'll admit that I'm already
biased against Vargas — I don't think he's that good of a
player and all the «future David Ortiz» comparisons irritated me.
I'm of the opinion that the pundits are generally
biased against Arsenal and even if we had all the
players which have been cited above from the other clubs i.e costa, matic etc etc, they'd still say we aren't good enough!
I'm so tired of people making these damning comments that aren't even based on observation; it's almost funny how
biased some people are
AGAINST their own
players.
And while it's a really stupid deflection to claim Hurdle himself is a racist (caveat: haven't actually read this particular BCB subthread), there has been demonstrated
bias against Latino
players in terms of their «behavior» and «how they play the game.»
Bob Bradley is their new manager and he got mad at AW for not signing his son Mike, claiming European clubs were
biased against American
players... Hope we stick it to them good.
Players like Lewis Terman, William Shockley and Robert Yerkes are part of science's darker history about fixed intelligence and
biases against race and country of origin.1 Yet their legacy lives on today.
So the question is really asking how can hardcore
players get over any
bias they might have
against easy controls.
Playing such a game may
bias the
player against the company or creators and affect the sales of the newer titles.