Sentences with phrase «bias by doing some research»

Work through this possible bias by doing some research.

Not exact matches

Do some research instead of going by what people tell you and biased media say.

Research suggests that a great many people assess evidence not as scientists are trained to do, but rather in an emotion - biased manner that is strongly influenced by the beliefs of their cultural cohort.

But by now she has picked up the implication of my questions: Do her social concerns taint her research results; is she biased?

Doctors» unconscious biases favor whites but do not affect high blood pressure treatment for their minority patients, according to a University of Colorado Boulder study, even though a previous study by the same research group found that doctors» biases are reflected in lower ratings by African - American patients.

Please do your own research on the mold in nuts / butters, esp peanuts / butter and that would need to start with spending a lot of time on the Internet (our best research tool), self - training in critical thinking by doing it, vetting various sites and authors in a variety of ways and over time, testing ideas within your own life and framework, and getting to the bottom of your own cognitive biases which prevent you from questioning authority in the first place.

Today's nutrition looks at all of the suggested causes, and does its best to pick the «most likely cause»... mostly by siding with personal biases and picking and choosing which research it wants to believe.

By comparing the educational outcomes of students who scored just above the admissions threshold (and thus were very likely to attend) and just below the admissions threshold (who mostly did not attend), Dougherty is able to account for the selection bias that has plagued prior CTE research.

But recent research by a Harvard professor using Los Angeles school data did not find that such assignments created a bias in value - added scores.

Flowers: «Long story, short: the CFR research has withstood criticism from Rothstein (a brilliant economist, whom CFR greatly respects), and their findings were backed up by other economists in the field (yes, some of them do have a «pro-VAM» bias, but such is social science).»

Amrein - Beardsley: Long story, short: the CFR research has [not] withstood criticism from Rothstein (a brilliant economist, whom CFR [and many others] greatly respect, and their findings were backed up by other economists [i.e., two to be exact] in the field (yes, some of them [only Chetty's buddy Kane] do have a «pro-VAM» bias, but such is social science).

Therefore it will be extremely bias towards everything that the iPad can do (and likely exaggerate) and like many internet authors, the author did little to no research on anything not made by Apple relying on complains of new users to tear apart non-Apple products.

MJ — I've made this comment before here, but I am skeptical of the Dalbar study — nobody seems to know any of the details of the research they did and since they seem to be sponsored by some sort of financial advisor group then the numbers are quite biased in my opinion.

ACE thinks that some of HLL's early studies were not conducted as well as they could have been, and that there were problems in some of the write - ups of those studies.262 For example, HLL conducted five studies with the same participant pool, which might have caused the results of some of those studies to be influenced by earlier experimental manipulations.263 Some studies also did not include appropriate control groups, and many studies did not control for desirability bias.264 We think these early studies helped influence animal advocates to see research into animal advocacy methods as possible and desirable, but that their utility is otherwise limited by some of their design flaws.

That would be an indication that the results obtained by any selected way of detrending may be biased, but doing exploratory research using simple detrending may be of interest even in such a case.

Climate change skeptics claimed the IPCC 2007 report — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global warming.

One approach would be to review how research papers are treated here at RC by both post authors and by the commenters, perhaps with an eye to comments that do not address anything scientific and thus arguably reflect bias such as calling people «ignorant food tubes» and such.

I don't think «industry» funding is the right answer as that would set up more biased research leading to a p — ssing contest between scientists controlled by their funders.

A group of former editors of the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) has launched today an open - source, peer - reviewed medical journal that hopes to avoid what they say are editorial biases in traditional journals having to do with the important role research played by drug and medical appliance companies.

To counteract our unavoidable bias, we do quite a bit of research by perusing online forums, reading other reviews (PCMag, CNET, etc), conducting Twitter polls and more.