What your comments do indicate however is your extreme
bias against those skeptics such as myself who accept AGW as provisionally true and your rather arrogant general attitude which begins to reveal an emotional attachment to this issue, calling into question your own objectivity.
Not exact matches
I find it rather rich that you are defending funding, but hold it
against skeptics as being «
biased» such as getting an honorarium from the Heartland Institute.
I find the comment «
skeptics get sacked, rarely get grants and find it harder to get published» both true and telling; it explains some of the
bias against them by the establishment and the media.
I hope
skeptics despite all the vile attacks
against them in populist and
biased channels contain their schadenfreude and try to maintain a dignity that has been rare among agw proponents.