The relatively healthy success rate among men applying for contact might logically be attributed to realistic advice being given to fathers by legal practitioners about their prospects in the face of
a biased judiciary.
Not exact matches
Black incarceration rates are the result of the
bias of the police and
judiciary.
«The allegation of
bias is a serious issue and it is capable of destroying public confidence in the
judiciary.
The
judiciary is responsible for ensuring that impartiality is not compromised by these
biased assumptions... Regrettably, that did not occur in this case.»
It is crucial that the
judiciary both be independent and appear to be independent so that there is public confidence that judicial decisions are made without
bias.
[1] A judge who manifests
bias or prejudice in a proceeding impairs the fairness of the proceeding and brings the
judiciary into disrepute.
Imagine my interest and surprise when the first panel of the morning, comprised exclusively of women in leadership roles in academia, government, legal services, and the
judiciary, [1] quickly turned to issues of implicit
bias among judges and stereotype threat in classrooms.
Complainants should be able to rely on a system free from myths and stereotypes, and on a
judiciary whose impartiality is not compromised by these
biased assumptions.
If a judicial candidate, before becoming judge, actively campaigns on partisan issues in violation of the Judicial Conduct Code, and if a candidate for judicial office pledges to be
biased in favor of the prosecution by promising to be «tough on crime», then the respect for the
judiciary will suffer.