Sentences with phrase «biased opinions over»

They propagate their limited knowledge and biased opinions over the Internet, and significantly influence the media and government.

Not exact matches

You can see CNN's hypocritical bias in the fact that they've been pasting this «News» all over their page for a week, when it was a widely - held opinion among scholars, decades ago.

If we lay aside our opinions, biases, views, mindsets... etc and honestly and objectively look at what the Bible says and teaches then we can only conclude that women are not to be pastors, preachers, or teachers over men.

Over there, with no bias, you can give your opinion and and publish your own polls so americans can vote.

I've seen a lot of Celtic «stuff» over the years with many many players — but still just one person's opinion who has an old school BB bias of points in the paint and defense, defense defense.

In the end, it is fact that will win over uneducated and biased opinion.

we will have over 80comments regarding which console to choose even if the article isn't biased a lot of the people here do nt even read articles and actually just want to spout of their opinion for no other reason than the sake of doing so myself included:)

C / decade and the simulated ensemble mean over the models, calculated from the grid boxes of the models where observations exist (which is flawed in my opinion, since excluding of mostly the high latitudes from the model data may emphasize a warm bias in lower latitudes in the models making them appear warmer than they are, but a possible cold bias of the global observations data set is not excluded in this way) had a trend of 0.3 deg.

It was ever so good to see the ever petulant one from the CM staff soundly put in his place, although having butted heads with with Readfern over some of his more outlandish scribblings over the years, my opinion could be considered somewhat biased.

Though I agree with you entirely that an obiously biased economist should have thier opinion taken with a giant grain of salt, I think it is unreasonable to ask that people hand over their critical judgetment of issues to the community of «respected scientists».

In my opinion it is much better to get a smooth fit with lots of error but zero bias, then to obtain an accurate fit by over fitting the data with too many unknown and unmeasured parameters.

Such a dispute over a common story immediately highlights the most serious problem with the Court's opinion: we all see what we want to see; behavioral biases like attribution and availability lead to individualized view of events.

The same biased expert witnesses are hired over and over again to give the same bad opinions, but their bias at trial can't be cross-examined.

From my vantage point, the answer is no, but that's just the opinion of a traffic attorney that's been fighting traffic tickets for over 17 years, so maybe I'm biased.