Sentences with phrase «bible as»

Your bible as a Bar student is the Civil Procedure Rules, also known as the White Book.

Putting aside whether one believes in the infallibility of the bible as a religious document or not, is seems to me that the theology on which the Left Behind series is based is flawed.

Electives in English, for example, include such courses as science fiction, the bible as literature and Shakespeare.

I would love a copy of this ovulation bible as Struggling to know when ovulate with irregular periods.

We read books and her bible as well as say our prayers.

Here's the difference between you and I. I view the bible as the word of God (I know rather archaic huh) and as such it is my starting point for determining my moral absolutes.

A coming together for inrichment, to fallow after the bible as one church body.

I'm talking about the bible as a whole.

Either obey every line of the bible as God's word, or else admit that some lines can be ignored, and then the entire book is of dubious value.

I believe the bible as much as I do in Grimms Fairy Tales.

If you tried (and a few have) to use any of the stories mention in the bible as a test of scientific theory or used in court for defense the angel Satan made me do it, or God said so, who are you to say «He's lying»

I'm all for asking the Holy Spirit to teach us but I think that this too is abused and used as an excuse not to * study * the bible as well as read what scholars and theologians have to teach us about it.

Then in seminary, I read The Silence of Jesus by James Beech and my whole belief in the bible as the inerrant word of God crumbled forever.

The bible as true and accurate fails the test at all levels of credibility.

He was God's golden boy and he's described in the bible as a «man after God's own heart.»

In fact, the obsession (read: idolatry) over the bible as the * only * guide and as a rigid rulebook has corresponded with notably less grace, compassion, forgiveness and justice within Christianity.

«actaully» stretched the truth as mormons «believe the book of mormon as the word of god, and also believe the bible as far as it is translated correctly.»

Your inane arguement that belief in the bible as the holy word of a god is not «religious» is abusrd, ignorant and patronizing.

I too study with a plain bible as I want to ruminate on what the word says, and what the Spirit is trying to say unfettered by someone else's opinions.

In a religion class or a class looking at the bible as literature - fine, butnot in a science class.

I personally have a problem with the «Golden Vellum» worship of the bible as it is played out in many evangelical churches, but the authority of God which the scriptures reveal remains respected.

The bible as a whole is based on what he said!

stop using bible as an excuse for every ridiculous thing.

But, if — a more likely «if» — we view the bible as the «living, breathing Word of God», then the idea that it (i.e. God) was entirely context - bound and it (i.e. God) settled for things we now view as horrendous and evil and it (i.e. God) accepted and condone injustice because it (i.e. God) was extremely limited in what it could achieve, then we have a massive theological problem.

He is a little scared of getting beaten by a girl and is using the bible as an excuse.

I am not sure how the use of the bible as a personal source of inspiration has anything to do with progressive - ness.

David, I know most thinking Christians use the bible as the basis for their faith.

In my old fundy circles they often refer to the bible as the «Living, Breathing, Word of God».

It takes some heavy * reinterpretation * to say that the bible opposes slavery — can be done, but it's not the straight - forward literal approach fundies would advocate — it isn't compatible with a view of the bible as divine or infallible.

So how exactly is using the bible as inspiration not inclusive?

The Nag Hammadi Scriptures represent evidence the bible as we know it was created from various Christian scriptures floating around the Roman Empire during the first 3 centuries AD.

Creationist «well, what about the origin of the universe, the fact that the universe obeys laws, the origins of life on this earth, the fact that the largest «gaps» in the fossil record correspond exactly with the organisms identified in the bible as being created by God, namely fish, birds, land animals and humans»

So I for one, know religion and the bible as spam, regardless of my outlook on a deity.

Why bother using a redacted version of the Hebrew bible as your Old Testament, to prove that Jesus was who he said he was.

I am not interested in whether the bible as a whole has changed because for the most part it hasn't.

As long as you embrace these nutcases whose goal it is to throw out scientific research and knowledge altogether in favor of the BIBLE as a science textbook, the less likely you will EVER see the inside of the Oval Office again.

At fifteen years old though my power was strong and my spells were successful and clairvoyant abilities growing, I became convinced that Jesus was still holding me back and performed a satanic ritual specifically designed to blasphemy the holy spirit (using the bible as an instruction manual) by calling Jesus and his power demonic, calling the holy spirit a filthy demonic entity and swearing I wanted God out of my life forever.

They have come to this conclusion because they see the bible as linear, every verse is as authoritative and truthful as any other verse.

The bible as true and accurate fails the test of credibility at all levels.

Accepting the bible as inerrant requires me to believe in a God who chose genocide more than once, a god who in anger slaughtered a first born child for the sin of the father, a god who became weary of the cries for mercy and decided to slaughter thousands more of his «chosen» people simply to prove he could.

Well, it comes from a 2000 year old book, contradicted by other 2000 year old books, no updates, can be interpreted in so many different ways depending on how the reader perceives his world (and how science has progressed... I'm sure if you were alive before galileo told you the earth did not revolve around the sun and had only the bible as your reference you would come to the same conclusion as the Vatican who said the sun revolved around the earth....

I think that many people can relate to the idea of certain people choosing to take the bible as a means to not have to have think any longer.

life is about right and worg thats wart i know about the bible you have to have fath in this turth or you will never understeand how the bible has the guid line for how thay can be peace in the world if you will really spead a lot of time reading the bible than look up on google or in some other books to many for me to name im taking about none chritin books at that and comeper them you will find that there is a lot of stuff that proves the bible as being right i wise i kone how to say it better to but i cant sorry but wan you pray just ast if there is a god make your self real to me other wise i have to hard a time beliveing somepen i cant see or hear and he will make his safe real and than you just sheek him to show you ware to go from there

You're only comeback to that was that you know Abe Lincoln was written as fiction because the author says so but refuse to understand that if we had the authors of the bible alive and could talk with us you'd probably find the same thing (obviously also as.sumption, but hey, if you think the authors wrote the bible as purely historical text, prove it).

And, if you believe God wrote the bible as the moral source for all humanity, you then have to answer the question of why he doesn't make the bible available to each human that he creates.

I am Jewish and have not thought of the bible as truth since early childhood when I could reason my way out of thinking that.

You say that Jesus has extrabiblical confirmation (even though I was talking about the supernatural aspects of the bible as a whole), and I asked you to provide those names.

this is really for all, there are christians that believe in replacement theology but the ones that read the bible as GOD's unerring truth read in the book of rom.

He said she rejected the bible as inerrant truth, which she would agree with.

Luther taught that we must read the bible as a book that conveys Christ to us.