Correction,
bible described the earth as a sphere suspended by nothing, clergy lied to the people, something they are still doing to this day.
Just as
the bible described.
The bible describes magic which does not exist.
J.W.... because
the bible describes what God created in the beginning.
The bible describes the creation of the universe that is different from the Big Bang;
the bible describes life in a way inconsistent with evolution.
Try a little research, James, into all the reasons a worldwide flood did not occur and animals and plants could not survive in any way possible as
the bible describes --- if you've got an ounce of courage, that is.
For ages men thought that the earth was flat but
the bible describes it as a circle, they thought the universe was standing still but it says it is expending.
I strongly believe that
the bible describes who GOD is first.
The bible describes the amorphous energy field as «without form and void».
Of course this is my opinion, but i'm guessing that those of us that don't believe the way
the bible describes the end of days, won't give it a second thought on Saturday... really.
There might have been ingellegent design in our creation, but it certainly did not come about the way
the bible describes it.
The way that
the bible describes heaven is all.uring, I will grant you that.
Anyone who currently believes that a global flood happened the way
the bible describes is delusional.
The bible describes this in sections like Daniel, Revelation, the gospels, etc...
The historical facts in
the bible describe the interaction of the God of Israel with humanity 3.
Right away we see that
the bible describes one who becomes a cosigner on a loan as «senseless ``!
Not exact matches
As far as I have researched there are no contemporary accounts (AKA outside the
bible) of ANY of the supernatural events
described within the
bible.
Therefore, the god
described by the
bible is fictional.
but I highly doubt that god is the same one
described in the
bible though
If there is a god and he is as
described in the
bible, and we are made in his image then logically Sephen Hawking would have no better chance at finding him then Gary Busey.
To put it simply, the Christian god is
described in the
bible.
Someday, it may well see that the beginning of creation, as
described in the
bible, had a valid premise, and we can not rule anything out.
And when the
bible say's something about the weight of the wind it was bronze age herdsmen who had felt more than a few stiff breezes
describing it, not divine inspiration from God letting those herdsmen know that air has a measurable weight.
It does not change the fact that there is still no evidence to show that ANY of the supernatural events
described in the
bible took place.
Dead sea crossing, moses camp on Mt Sinai, the rock struck from which water flowed, Aarons al; tar to Baal, Noahs, ark, the actual sight of christs crucifiction, Sodom and Gamorrah, all found exactly where, and exactl; y as
described in the
bible!
Sources that are contemporaneous to the events
described in the
bible, verifiable, and independently shown to be reliable?
Evolution shows that mankind was not produced as
described in the
bible, no one has ever seen a talking snake; so how likely is it that the garden story is not a myth?
I urge you all to read the
bible, specifically the book of The Revelation, Chapter 1, Verses 12 - 18, which
describes Jesus Christ, as told by the Apostle Paul.
There are several people in the
bible who are
described as being «blameless before the law».
While there may some evidence that some of the places, characters and events
described in the
bible are accurate, this only applies to natural, not SUPERnatural places, characters and events.
I believe you follow Jesus Christ in that you believe he was some magical human, as
described in the
bible.
So either you you're claiming that the very first
bible created an uproar, or you misspoke on using Latin to
describe the original language.
ALL of what I just
described took place in the first TWO PAGES of Genesis, meaning that MY account of it here is virtually the same as what appears in any
bible.
I gather that this strikes you as a very dissatisfying portrayal, and it should for two reasons: One, you are reading a portion of the
bible which
describes a portion of His attributes which can be remedied by simply reading the WHOLE
bible to see what it has to say regarding His longsuffering, kindness, and love; that, I dare say without which, you would not even be able to sit here and slander Him with the irreverance conveyed in your words.
Then you might understand that Christian god as
described in the
bible is not loving, doesn't give a hoot about human suffering, and in fact does not exist.
the creation
described in the
bible was not intended be scientific; that's a ridiculous notion and argument, to think that was its intentions.
A&A, like I said, the
bible is filled with eye witness accounts where they
described the evidence.
when i sought the lord he heard me and filled me with the Holy Ghost just as it
describes in the
bible as it happened to the apostles..
There isn't enough water in the world to create a flood as
described by the
bible and if there were it creates all kinds of other problems with the biblical myth.
But again, you listed a
bible verse that
describes some of love's characteristics, but it isn't a definition.
You have nothing to worry about, the chances Jesus existed as he is
described in the
bible are pretty low.
There are sources for a description of the Christ beyond the
bible — which never does
describe his physical appearance.
It poignantly
describes a woman captured smuggling
Bibles who sings Jesus songs while tortured.
Because the accepted scientific stand is that there is no such evidence of a worldwide flood as
described in the
bible.
I am persuaded that the God I believe in, is the very one
described in the
bible.
That being said, as a follower of Christ I always try to adhere to my best behavior no matter where I am, alone or in public, and I keep that in the forefront of my mind lest I be judged like the restaurant patrons you have
described in this article despite the fact I don't do any of these things (i.e. t shirt,
bible, leaving pamphlets in lieu of tip, etc...) Will I become a better tipper after reading this?
At no place in the
bible is the term fornication used to
describe sex between unmarried people specifically or in any way meant to encompass all sex out side of marriage.
Yes, we know for a fact that the Christian version of god (ie, the one
described in the
bible) does not exist.
You can have «the God Who is referred to in th
bible» without «the God as
described in the
bible».
So Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, Perry... none of these are going to the heaven
described in the
bible.