Sentences with phrase «bible which»

We didn't get a chance to see many of the items, but we can tell you there's a bible which will clear the screen of all NPCs, eliminating the possibility of them pushing you off the puzzle or blocking your path to success.

As someone with complete faith in Christianity, christian singles over 50 have spent more than half of their lives living by the bible which can make christian senior dating in today's digital and progressive age a bit difficult without having to go against the teachings of Christianity... Read More»

As someone with complete faith in Christianity, christian singles over 50 have spent more than half of their lives living by the bible which can make christian senior dating in today's digital and progressive age a bit difficult without having to go against the teachings of Christianity.

I pray for my children, my guests, the staff, I pray for wisdom in each and I ask for God's wisdom through the day and I read the bible which gives me food for my mind and guidance for the day.

@ Human — i could quote plenty of things from the bible which will make the hairs stand on your back.

So, saying Jesus is the son of god, is based on the simple premise that because the bible which was not written by Jesus himself, which wasn't even written by a disciple of Jesus or disciples, which wasn't started until several generations after Jesus's says he was the son of god, that makes it true?

Do you think all the books of the bible which were not politicaly correct, in the bishops view at Nicea had more to say were not included.

That is not the whole of the Word of God, it is a reference to one particular part of the bible which may or may not be properly applied.

We're not trying to get theists to accept them... we're trying to get you to acknowledge the baseless claims that are rampant in the bible which undermine the existence of any deity.

Contrast that with the myths in the bible which have been largely unchanged since Judaism borrowed them from neighboring tribes.

(ENTIRE BOOK) There is a way of reading the bible which opens the door to vital faith without shutting the door to critical thought.

(according to the bible which I can not use).

Your bible which teaches you to perform baptism for the dead, also shows that your anthropomorphic God is a blood thirsty man.

ops sorry i meant Amniculi... blah blah blah about Poe's Law,, its hypocrisy!!!!!! talk trash about Christianity should be able to do the same about Islam, not encourging it just saying do nt be scare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! do it will its not a felony yet, cause soon you wont be able too... Let me be clear, I meant express your opinions, comments about any religion as you do about Christianity, plus Im not religious, i just believe in jesus christ son of god and the word of the bible which is difference religion is made by people...

Maybe opening your minds to the real world and reading other material instead of the bible which has been rewritten over and over again by who knows will give you a better idea of our world and universe.

Kind of off topic the following question: Do you know if the greek words used in the bible which are translated as «to believe» have another or broader meaning?

I am not sure that I think it is the bible which blocks understanding and insight.

I gather that this strikes you as a very dissatisfying portrayal, and it should for two reasons: One, you are reading a portion of the bible which describes a portion of His attributes which can be remedied by simply reading the WHOLE bible to see what it has to say regarding His longsuffering, kindness, and love; that, I dare say without which, you would not even be able to sit here and slander Him with the irreverance conveyed in your words.

Which leads us to the stories in the bible which include:

You show me a contemporary passage in the bible which states what you say and I will eat my shirt.

It is also funny how their bible which is suppose to be the word of god, was actually put together by a council adding in what fit best to keep the empire united best they could.

There is also another scripture in the bible which supports this in the book of Joel.

You boo who every explanation anyone gives you and run back to the Dawkins bible which you know was contrived with intentional bias.

btw muslims belive in jesus moses and muhammad as prophets and belive in their original teachings not the ones placed in the bible which have been altered by pagan romans.

The museum also has the two English «source» Bibles which show the cutout holes of the scripture Jefferson included in his version.

Not exact matches

When I was young, there was an amazing publication called The Whole Earth Catalog, which was one of the bibles of my generation.

Graham's philosophy of «value investing» — which shields investors from substantial error and teaches them to develop long - term strategies — has made The Intelligent Investor the stock market bible ever since its original publication in 1949.»

The modern - day bible for this way of thinking is a 2014 book by Belgian organizational behaviour consultant Frederic Laloux called Reinventing Organizations, which posits that reporting structures (and, indeed, job descriptions) have no purpose in the workplace of the future.

By the way evidently you believe in the bible so do you disagree with «be fruitful and multiply (not to be confused with be fruits and don't multiply in this election for a couple of states) and Psalm 127 which says children are a blessing.

And given God existing billions of years, which includes over all human history, that God interacting with others and them not being in the bible, they're the same, liars, lunatics, or dreaming... just so you can reject God and feel good about that choice.

... which bible are these ppl reading?

This is just one example of many in the bible, where god's words go beyond man's understanding of the times in which they lived.

So the bible, which tells the story of your god, also says you are a fool for not believing what it says?

The bible describes magic which does not exist.

But when evaluating the claims of the bible, one must use circular logic... which isn't logical at all.

In each case, he gave the supposedly correct bible «prediction» followed by what he claimed science thought was the case and finally what we now know, which supposedly coincided with what the bible «predicted.»

The bible is God's rule book on how you are to love him, you can't just pick and choose which ones you want to follow.

Believing something for which there is no evidence, especially something as extremely far - fetched as the bible, is delusional.

@ His Panic: so... are you claiming the fear of Pr.1 is the SAME as that of 1 Jn.4: 18 (which would make the bible self - contradictory)?

You pointed to a dispute of how neandertahal DNA didn't get included in human DNA, But that article doesn't change the FACT that neanderthals existed, which proves the bible wrong.

Moral of the story: most religious folks tend pick and choose which parts of the bible to get feisty about.

The ones in english are of course translations that have varying problems of translation, all of which are clearly understood at this point (as the bible is the most studied text on the face of the earth, by orders of magnitude).

which version of the bible?

outside of the bible, or any other religious texts (which, again, are only relevant to those accept the claimed authority) do you see any evidence of heaven, hell, sin, or redemption?

Those were your two sentences, in the second you claim the bible would be a myth, in the first that you think he's as you said, which is wrong.

The bible has the Ten commandments, which the first four are about God, the others are about social «rules» and structure.

the whole phrophies thing, the whole bible is open to interrptation which means i can put almost any area or event in to it's meaning to accommidate my own objective.

Not unlike the bible, your posts seem coherent until someone actually bothers to read them, at which time they crumble under the weight of contradiction and nonsense.

«If we are to believe the Bible» WHICH bible.

Apparently we're not reading the same book, because you labor under the delusion that I have not read the bible, which version are you reading (because there are SO many) so I can see if yours has what I'm searching for.