In addition to sociology, tradition, and
biblical authority there is Luther's teaching on marriage and family life.
Not exact matches
There is no
biblical authority to put anything into law based on
biblical beliefs.
As I have argued in a previous book, Evangelicals at an Impasse:
Biblical Authority in Practice,
there is no set procedure or program for controlling this theological dialogue.
There those in
authority, in churches, who perpatrate expectations, and use pressure of things not
biblical.
its male predominance), or are
there deeper principles implicit in the texture of the
Biblical fabric which make male
authority a cultural, and thus relative, affair?
There is a fascinating story here to be told - but one which would take us too far afield from this discussion - about the intricate interplay between the crises of
biblical authority and Christian belief on the one hand and the rise of the novel and the growth of art history and literary criticism on the other.
The heat generated by this topic is witness to the fact that we are, in Pinnock's words, «close to the heart of the conception of religious
authority in our evangelical confession, which «limits the ground of religious
authority to the Bible.3»
There is a «deep relationship between origin and
authority» that can not be ignored.4 Thus discussion concerning the implications of inspiration is of interest to all evangelicals who seek to be
Biblical Christians.
There is
biblical authority and historical precedent for mass evangelism.
Besides the
biblical and legal grounds for reporting suspected abuse to the civil
authorities,
there are also practical reasons to do so.
If ever
there was a homogeneous version of this tradition in national life; if ever, after legal disestablishment, a faith was re-established in the popular ethos; if ever
there was agreement on
biblical authority, on God, Jesus, heaven and hell and the true, the beautiful and the good, then it was in the high years of what one of my book titles terms the Protestant Righteous Empire.
As far as the color, race or whatever of the Jews in
Biblical times it stands as a mute subject because none of us were
there so
there so no one is a true
authority of such trivial things.
There is one teaching
authority, the pope, who both originates and finalizes such «truth,» without having to listen to or be corrected by other sources of insight such as the sensus fideli (the actual beliefs and practices of the people) and the scholarly reflections of
biblical exegetes and theologians.