Following Kierkegaard's existential thesis that truth is «subjectivity,» Barth translated the eschatological symbols of
biblical faith into symbols reflecting a crisis in human Existenz.
Not exact matches
But the task of preserving even our moral floor is complicated by the determination of many that «we» should have free and full access to the remissive power of Christian forgiveness without any of the interdictory authority of
biblical faith — even if this means that this power can only be «pried from God's clutches» by corrupting it, on at least some important occasions,
into nihlistic nonjudgmentalism.
Sarah Bessey clearly, passionately and faithfully explains why her Christian
faith means she has to be a feminist, and offers a profoundly moving call to action for us all to grow
into full
Biblical personhood.»
Because the Bible is the most effective force in history for lifting women to higher levels of respect, dignity, and freedom, we join an historic succession of women whose Christian
faith is forged from
biblical truth and whose lives are shaped
into Christ's image on the anvil of obedience.
Again, both attempt to translate the
biblical form of eschatological
faith into a modern form of existential intensity.
It is because the
biblical teaching about the kingdom of God promises joy, contentment, and significance to those who live under the rule and reign of God that the invitation to enter
into the kingdom by
faith in Jesus Christ has such persuasive power.
To take that
into account means taking seriously some specifically theological themes not identical to, but derived from,
biblical faith.
When one takes the
biblical faith and the incarnation seriously
into account, the result is a theology of liberation.
The projection of an opposition between reason and
faith» wherein the former claims objectivity and the latter demands assent to a set of propositions that can not be proven»
into the
biblical context anachronistically imposes Enlightenment categories where they would not have been intelligible.
It is therefore at its best more inclusively
Biblical rather than evangelical only; it is directed indeed to sinful men who need to be reconciled to God but also to men who need in all things to grow up
into mature manhood in the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ and who are to interpret to others the meaning of Christian
faith.
In conclusion, then, we may say that
biblical inspiration is the effect of God's promise on individuals writing within the context of a community of
faith brought
into existence and sustained by a vision of promise emanating from the Spirit of hope.
At the same time, it opens the way for theologians more decisively guided by the distinctive character of
biblical faith and of Christian symbols and images to appropriate the achievements of process thinkers
into their own understanding.
If we put the
biblical definition of
faith into Hebrews 11:1, and say, «Trust is firm confidence in things hoped for,» the sentence makes perfect sense.
The alleged subordination of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected
biblical texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel is collapsed
into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of
faith, so that the notion of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
According to
biblical faith, this contradiction does not of necessity betray man
into sin.
It is difficult to translate the
biblical view that
faith brings together the eternal love of God and the human longing to be loved
into the language of human development.
Is there an eschatology which can take
into account both the
biblical record and the deepest insights of our
faith?
Biblical scholars have recently turned to the social sciences for clearer insights
into the social forces that molded
faith communities in Scripture, all in an effort to sharpen the reading and interpretation of the Bible.
On the other hand, such activities require the perspective of
Biblical faith which seeks the Kingdom of God on earth without falling
into the illusion that we are going to bring this Kingdom
into being by our own actions or that we can expect to participate in it within our own time.
If Christianity continues to tell you that WHEN you get your act together — God will finally open his arms, the representatives of this
faith are not understanding the premier principal of God — through Christ he loves you NOW — but when his love begins to radiate
into your personal life - your very personal life - you will make choices reflecting that reality — all other things, people, dogmas,
Biblical interpretations — all of that through the long centuries of man — will be a drop in His eternal ocean and in that first eternal moment — won't matter - your needs now matter — Christ addresses need — with Himself — demands — with parabolic events — and refusal — with the end result of free will — even the will to reject Him — when He would have done anything for you to not be rejected.
Biblical inspiration is the effect of God's promise on individuals writing within the context of a community of
faith brought
into existence and sustained by a vision of promise emanating from the Spirit of hope.
If we can respectfully acknowledge that a majority of todays» generation of believers are taught
into the
faith by their parents, we reluctantly must conclude that the theology base of * a lot * of these believers is not upon careful reflection and personal choice upon the fervent divulgence of the Scriptures, but rather a hodge - podge compilation of «feel good» thoughts that have no
biblical or moral grounding other than vague references.
What guides the recent interest in «
biblical storytelling» is the conviction that since Biblical literature existed as oral traditions which were then put into script, it was intended to be spoken in the faith comm
biblical storytelling» is the conviction that since
Biblical literature existed as oral traditions which were then put into script, it was intended to be spoken in the faith comm
Biblical literature existed as oral traditions which were then put
into script, it was intended to be spoken in the
faith communities.
I do not believe the vision expressed in Habits of the Heart is utopian; it is too locked
into biblical and republican
faith and has appeared too frequently and survives too promisingly to be forgotten.
Furthermore, modern
biblical scholarship has fully demonstrated the chasm which exists between the
faith of the historic Church and its
biblical ground, a chasm created by the entrance of the Church
into history.
The notion of scarcity has been introduced
into biblical faith.
Nevertheless, the substance of
biblical faith allows us to say, at the very least, the following: without a trust in the promise of a meaningful and unimaginably fulfilling future, the move
into history would be intolerable.
The
biblical faith came
into contact with Greek thought, and this cross-fertilization led to a new perspective on the world.
A
faith - based family comedy for folks who don't mind having a familiar
Biblical scripture overhauled
into a contemporary allegory about saving the environment.
A
Biblical thread runs through this album, weaving
faith and emotive frankness
into this tapestry of senses, addressing the relationship between past and future.
Kimberly has served in various ministries and held leadership positions through her church and integrates
biblical principles
into her practice with
faith - based clients.