Your biblical god thing is also an impossibility by definition.
Not exact matches
however, that would put me in a position of forcing the
things of
God into a box constructed by man which is not
biblical.
The
biblical view of
God is an utterly transcendent One, who «is before all
things & holds all
things together» (Col. 1:17).
I wonder what would be revealed if scientists would be permitted to study the remains in the tomb at Machpelah... after all, like all
things Biblical, we only have one reference, and we ONLY have Abraham's word that he saw the face of
God (contrary to John 1:18: No man hath seen
God at any time, AND John 6:46: Not that any man hath seen the Father)... Bet you those bones aren't from a 175 year old man and 127 year old woman...
Missouri Synod theologians had traditionally affirmed the inerrancy of the Bible, and, although such a term can mean many
things, in practice it meant certain rather specific
things: harmonizing of the various
biblical narratives; a somewhat ahistorical reading of the Bible in which there was little room for growth or development of theological understanding; a tendency to hold that
God would not have used within the Bible literary forms such as myth, legend, or saga; an unwillingness to reckon with possible creativity on the part of the evangelists who tell the story of Jesus in the Gospels or to consider what it might mean that they write that story from a post-Easter perspective; a general reluctance to consider that the canons of historical exactitude which we take as givens might have been different for the
biblical authors.
The same
thing followed throughout
Biblical times, man tried earning redemption by own merits and efforts / works but could not keep
God's Covenants & Law, man's efforts were not sufficient.
But a strong,
Biblical understanding of
God's grace, a grace that gives us everything for free, a grace that is not earned, not worked for, and can not be lost or destroyed, a grace that covers over all our sins, this kind of grace leads to one
thing — eternal security.
In terms of how my faith played a part in making that decision,
God is the
God of justice, these
things are evil, and it is
biblical, right, and godly to pursue justice.
On the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood Web Site, Wayne Grudem warns that if Christians accept egalitarianism, «we will begin to have whole churches who no longer «tremble» at the Word of
God (Isaiah 66:2), and who no longer live by «every word that comes from the mouth of
God» (Matthew 4:4), but who pick and choose the
things they like and the
things they don't like in the Bible.»
kermit, We agree on one
thing, I can't comprehend that the
biblical God is love, caring, or real.
Hence, the absence of the Christian understanding of
God in preChristian religion indicates that the vision of
things as finite existents was virtually absent for common sense as well as for philosophy until the impact of
Biblical thought caused it to prevail.
Surely, however, the basic affirmation of Christian theism, founded (once we have got behind the images in which often it was phrased) on the
biblical witness to the faithfulness and consistency of
God and to his unfailing maintenance of the creation in being, is that all
things at all times and in all places are present to
God, that he is always at work in them, that he constantly energizes through them, that he never ceases to move in the creation towards the accomplishment of his holy will and the revelation of his holy purpose.
Throughout the
biblical story,
God shows up on the side of those who are being oppressed, those who are the victims of
things not as they ought to be.
All of these
things were going to happen no matter what, but
God took the blame for all of them by inspiring the
biblical authors to write what they did about Him.
Atheists in the 16th and 17th century used to rail about
Biblical facts that were incorrect, these
things proved there were no
God... One big one was that Israel no longer existed as a Nation on the earth... Well I bet they were rolling over in their graves when miraculously the nation was re-created in 1949!
Prayer changes
things Prayer takes many
Biblical forms Prayer is talking with
God Prayer can be private Prayer can be corporate Prayer can be public Prayer can be political Prayer can be formal Prayer can be casual Prayer can be in public schools Prayer is not curtailed by the words of a man Prayer is never stopped by an unbeliever Prayer changes
things
The only
thing that bugs me about this guy is that there are more people than not who are teetering on the brink of faith in Jesus, and all this guy does is try to knock people away from faith... This is his word against
Gods word, I've been reading these articles they've been posting, and nothing he's said has any
biblical foundation whatsoever...
DH «I am in favour of recovering the
biblical understanding of shaming in the sense that «
God chose the weak
things of the world to shame the strong» 1 cor 1:27... as an encouragement to anyone who is a victim (and therefore considered weak in the eyes of the world) that there is a greater power to call on in order to shame... any person in a position of power in the church that is using their power to oppress rather than serve... Does that help or hinder?»
That possibility seems to be ruled out for the theist, whose view of the relation between
God and creation has been molded by the general
biblical understanding of
things.
It is therefore at its best more inclusively
Biblical rather than evangelical only; it is directed indeed to sinful men who need to be reconciled to
God but also to men who need in all
things to grow up into mature manhood in the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ and who are to interpret to others the meaning of Christian faith.
But when Israel set out to do these
things,
God took the blame for their actions by inspiring the
biblical authors to lay the guilt fully in His hands.
This is to say — not that
biblical scholarship and the correction of errors can be unimportant but rather — that the one indispensable
thing, if the Bible is to be the Word of
God, is a receptive attitude of spirit and responsiveness of will.
I believe that all of the
Biblical Feasts and Festivals were intended to teach us
things about
God, Messiah, ourselves, and living in community.
I listen to pastors condemn the lack of
biblical literacy in the church today and then turn around and say the most outlandish
things about
God or Jesus, and even crazier
things about people of other religions, political persuasion, or sexual orientation.
The world offers a lot of different definitions and interpretations, but for one interested in what
God has to say about it, a
biblical study of the word makes a few
things very clear — and for starters, makes clear what it's not.
If Christianity continues to tell you that WHEN you get your act together —
God will finally open his arms, the representatives of this faith are not understanding the premier principal of
God — through Christ he loves you NOW — but when his love begins to radiate into your personal life - your very personal life - you will make choices reflecting that reality — all other
things, people, dogmas,
Biblical interpretations — all of that through the long centuries of man — will be a drop in His eternal ocean and in that first eternal moment — won't matter - your needs now matter — Christ addresses need — with Himself — demands — with parabolic events — and refusal — with the end result of free will — even the will to reject Him — when He would have done anything for you to not be rejected.
The process - relational model of
God as the most extensive exemplification of primordial creativity, with every worldly occasion in its own process of becoming; the process - relational concept of
God as the principle of order channeling the world's becoming toward ever richer and more harmonious experience (the primordial nature); and the process - relational concept of
God's preservation of every worldly occasion in
God's own everlasting becoming (the consequent nature), with each such occasion evaluated and positioned for its greatest possible contribution to the divine life — these perspectives on divine reality which process - relational thought claims to find exemplified in the very nature of
things are separately and together congruent with and supportive of the
biblical images and events which describe the «already» in inaugurated eschatology.»
But whether the «nature of
things» be grounded in
God, or whether
God be the primordial exemplification of «the nature of
things» with respect to an independent, abstract «category of the ultimate,» it is the case that both the
biblical record and process - relational thought recognize a pervasive movement toward greater richness of experience as a generic feature of reality.
Of course, I'm as guilty as anyone else of assuming I know
God's thoughts about
things, but I've recently found myself a bit more hesitant to call my
biblical interpretations absolute truth.
I think we go outside the
biblical boundaries when suggesting
things like
God revealing Himself to those who have no knowledge of His previous revelations.
Even though
biblical religion has always understood
God as the source of novelty («Behold, I make all
things new»), classical theologies have predominantly associated
God with cosmic order and have failed to consider in any depth the connection between
God and novelty.
I have been saying in my posts on the violence of
God that
God inspired the
biblical writers to say that He told them to do the violent
things they did, even though He did not.
does «
biblical christianity» still require us to stone to death those who work on the sabbath, commit adultery, curse their parents, worship
gods other than yahweh, etc etc or did jesus change his mind about those
things after his «virgin birth»?
Some views say that the Bible is full of errors and exaggerations so that the
things it describes didn't really happen, while other views hold that the violent events might have happened as described but
God did not command them to do it nor did He inspire the
biblical authors to write about these events as they did.
So how can
God inspire
biblical authors to write that He commanded Israel to do
things that He did not actually command them to do?
Boldest: Shari Johnson with «My Lesbian Daughter, The Bible, and Sex» «When I hear terms like «
God's design» and «
Biblical marriage» I have to wonder who decides these
things... We keep a death grip on the scriptures that suit us — and the translation of those scriptures becomes more a matter of tradition, opinion and convenience than the Word of
God.»
If there's one
thing I've learned during my year of
biblical womanhood, it's not to place limits on
God's presence.
A wonderful colleague of mine, a Hebrew Scripture scholar, once told me that he thought the most succinct statement of
biblical Christianity was this: «In all
things God works for the good of those who love him» (Rom.
Yes, I agree with Greg that the
biblical accounts say these
things, but I would say that Greg's explanation of these difficult
biblical events still turns
God into a monster - releasing monster like Zeus.
I had parts of
Gods biblical word supernaturally revealed to me in dreams before I read it, I was dreaming about
things i didn't know about that were from the bible.
«The Bible is not about offering
things like a
biblical view of dating,» he says, «but rather about how
God the Father offered his Son, Jesus Christ, to death to redeem a rebellious world from the slavery and damnation of sin.
45 The «apathetic»
God «fulfills the ideal of one who is physically beyond the reach of external influences and psychologically anaesthetized — like
things that are dead... This apathetic
God became the
God of the Christians, although he was a contradiction to the
biblical God, with his emotions and suffering.»
If you're familiar with the
biblical story of the tower of Babel, you may recall that the attempt of humanity to do such a
thing resulted in their language being garbled by
God.
You can discuss your personal relationship with
God and ask any questions you might have about
things such as
Biblical interpretation, prayer, or anything pertaining to your walk with Christ.