Not exact matches
Then again, I'm not a
Biblical scholar on
human sexuality.
Some feel it reflects a negative valuation of
human sexuality based on the dualism of Hellenistic thought, which saw salvation as a freeing of the soul from the body, rather than the
biblical tradition which affirms the goodness of the whole creation.
The
biblical God, who is the creator of
human sexuality, neither engages in sexual acts nor has a spouse.
On the contrary, there are standards of right and wrong within Christian tradition concerning
human sexuality, based in
human nature and
biblical revelation, which are acceptable to homosexual and heterosexual alike, and which can form the moral basis of public policy.
But Christianity contains more positive attitudes as well, including
biblical affirmations of the
human body — evident in the creation story, the concept of the incarnation and the Roman Catholic notion of the unitive purposes of
sexuality.
5)
Human sexuality in
Biblical texts is also portrayed in terms of qualities of relationship such as faithfulness, love, obligation, and justice.
Of course, for
Biblical authors also
human sexuality is one of the areas of life that should be in the service of God, and, to be sure, our failure to respond to this call is sinful.
What strikes me, though, is how much Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI have tried to move the discussion not so much away from natural law as toward a deeper, more
biblical understanding of
human sexuality.
John Piper, co-founder of The Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, called the Nashville Statement a «Christian manifesto» on
human sexuality.
And
biblical writers held a much more complicated view of
human sexuality than contemporary debates have acknowledged.